- May 6, 2017
- 1,718
- 5,356
You sound like a pastor speaking from the pulpit to his congregation or to his flock of sheep.For L&P, as a creative person, it turned out to be more acceptable to violate the original plan and disrupt the deadlines than to change the plot and its idea of the whole game, and I understand and support him in this. And you, apparently, are not. That's the difference between me and you. That is why I urge everyone to be lenient with L&P. And you, at any cost, demand that he admit his mistakes. But he does not consider his choice in favor of preserving history intact to be erroneous. Because from his point of view, it is the content of the game, its plot, that is the master plan, and the timing is the criterion that he could not accurately assess at the initial stage without having the necessary experience for this.
What Dr.Fapalot is trying to tell you is that L&P should be open to constructive criticism. And I mean really constructive. That kind of criticism is incredibly important to everyone. And if you think that Dr.Fapalot is not supportive of him in what he is doing, you are also wrong. He has been a legend for a long time!
We need to be able to express our thoughts about the game in the form of criticism or ideas, don't we? I share his ideas/story for the most part, but every now and then we have different opinions. But that's not important. It's about the conversation about it. And if L&P sticks to his story...time will tell if he was right or not.