No more naive than it is to trust an anonymous service making use of cryptocurrency transactions only, not to mention that their advertisers will continue to fund your project in the first place.It is very naive to think that Valve will really continue to allow adult games in case of controversies (which could cause millionaire losses with lawsuits).
What if the criminal is anonymous ads themselves? It would make a lot more sense as to why they've chosen to maintain their anonymity. How do you know for sure that anonymous ads isn't funding terror organizations? How do you know that anonymous ads isn't financing a human trafficking ring? You don't, because they're completely anonymous and you can't trace them, their spending habits, their legal cases, anything.If someone commits a crime using a knife, should we boycott or criminalize the company that made that knife? If there are criminals using cryptocurrencies to fund criminal activity, it is not cryptocurrencies's fault. Even before this technology began to exist, criminal activities were already (and still are) funded using conventional money.
Furthermore, using an example from Anne's post, tumblr is a service that was forced to remove porn in its entirety if they wanted to continue being hosted on Apple Store, because tumblr couldn't stop users from coming in with **********. That is to say, that tumblr was held responsible for their inability to stop other people from using their service to commit a crime and forced to change that if they wanted to do legitimate business.
Similarly, much of the porn purge push from Paypal, Reddit, and other places in the last year have actually been because the law now holds accountable any service that might be used by people promoting sex work. As a result Reddit purged all subreddits that dealt with anything close to prostitution. A lot of camwhores were purged from many different funding platforms, as well as Paypal. Again, I bring up the possibility that A-Ads is used to promote human trafficking. Why? The law that resulted in the afformentioned purges was ostensibly to stop human trafficking. The problem with it is, by forcing it underground and out of reputable places, all it does is create a more dangerous situation for these girls in the first place. Now they're more likely to be forced into human trafficking, and what if the dark web site that they're being human trafficked on is funded by A-Ads? You don't and can't ever know because you can't research them because they're anonymous.
If it is offline you get no revenue. Considering the fact that just adding analytics got people to freak out when I worked on a unity game in the past, no, there's not going to be a significant enough number of people for this to be a viable option.Again, this is your opinion, not the absolute truth. Even though most users boycott the game because of the ad, there will certainly be people who, if they are interested in the project, are going to play, even if it's offline, without any whining.
Ah, devolving to insults now? Anne's probably older than you, I've spoken with him on many occasions throughout this site, sometimes wherein certain personal info has been shared, and can say for certain he's older than me.If you are too young to be able to use one of the dozens of debit cards that can be loaded using bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies, it may be best to ask for help from an adult.