I wasn't judging. I legitimately asked a question. Like a number of posters I saw, I too don't know but am curious about what "truly interactive sex" means for this game. Overly interactive sex has ruined many a game for my tastes. Not saying it is wrong, just saying I'm not interested. Although I potentially hold out hope that some day someone will create something interesting along these lines that I do like. I posted a question to try to determine whether or not I wanted try this game myself or not.
One person made a bit of a response telling what actually exists. I posted two different styles along the lines of what I took the answer to be suggesting. If it is like one or the other and someone says, "Yes, it is like that one," then I understand the idea. An example that works similarly would tell me much more clearly. (The answer could just as easily be, "No, the interactive sex works nothing like either of those examples.")
As for cutting out parts of the original post that had no relevance to my question... (the unrelated and omitted parts of random third party post follows)
"All in all, not a bad start!"
"But agreed, this shouldn't be labeled as a 1.0 just yet."
I find that posts such as this one that cover multiple topics, i.e. 1. an explanation, 2. discussion of a question, 3. random sidebar, tend to get responses to everything but the actual question. Although seems even when I reduce my post down to only the question doesn't work either. Someone invariably invents new topics to add about my post and still ignores the question.
