Wolf RPG Completed Artemis Pearl 2 [v1.2] [Triangle!]

[Tsugumi]

Any idea what the banned content is? That just makes me want to play it more.

While DLSite has no mention of this for some reason, one website has the game sport the "shotacon" tag. So yeah, probably Rule 7, though hell if we ever know for sure since that request thread got locked a whopping 3 years after creation.

 

[shortstak]

the art looks pretty good. this worth checking out? 7GB is a bit much

 

[HoneyLibido]

had a catastrophic failure trying to open the zip file for this game. downloaded it from gofile if that helps.

You're probably trying to use Win11's native explorer, it used to work fine but idk maybe they updated it and got fucked up.

Anyway use 7z or anything else to open the archive and extract it.

 

[athosberger]

i miss some screenshots of actual game play

 

[sanshisan]

While DLSite has no mention of this for some reason, one website has the game sport the "shotacon" tag. So yeah, probably Rule 7, though hell if we ever know for sure since that request thread got locked a whopping 3 years after creation.

Thats so retarded. F95 has a shota tag and that implies shotacon. If not, why label it in the first place? The same logic does also apply for the loli tag. Bottom line, if you don't allow for certain content, don't tag it and just ban it on sight. Its not hard to follow rules, especially if you're working on this fucking place which barely has any.

Recently F95 decided that a bunch of games to be released on here are not fit for this site since they have a "no sexual content" rule. On the other hand, there is a "no sexual content" tag as well. Which lead me to believe that there aren't really any rules here and its just that random <removed>s feel like making up random garbage just so they can make up rules, simply because they want to pretend they have any power. The official rules are just for show anyway and are, to nobodies suprize, useless as they lack consideration, foresight and merit. Because if the staff is incapable of deciding what the rules even mean, then its not even worth mentioning its appliances towards the userbase. The rules alone feel too circlejerky so I just ignore them as I always did. Never got a ban.

So something either changed which made F95 more strict with the rules while still allowing for certain games which the same rules apply to be allowed in or one mod/uploader is bored and just decided to troll. Its schizo, but thats F95 for ya. I'd say, if theres a new rule disallowing loli/shota/non sexual shit, ban every game that had the tag on and every member participating in any of the threads retroactively, which would take less than a day. End of story.

 

[Freakydeaky420]

Main dialogue is TLed with GPT5. However, it was kinda shit stability wise and I think its generally worse than 4.1 so I will be switching back after this game. Dialogue wise, you won't notice a difference from 4.1.
--

You must be registered to see the links

- If you want to contribute/improve the translation, follow the instructions in the

You must be registered to see the links

README.
- If you find an issue PING ME or I am not likely to see it.

How do you get GPT5 to translate a different language accurately?

 

[Qahlz]

Thats so retarded. F95 has a shota tag and that implies shotacon. If not, why label it in the first place? The same logic does also apply for the loli tag. Bottom line, if you don't allow for certain content, don't tag it and just ban it on sight. Its not hard to follow rules, especially if you're working on this fucking place which barely has any.

Because if you go by the tag descriptions, loli or shota doesn't mean pre-pubescent. Loli here is defined as "Girls with undeveloped bodies in sexual situations", which is also often applied to underage, but pubescent, or even some post-pubescent characters.

If you want to read or discuss the difference, there's dozens of threads over in the General Discussions forum that are about this topic.

 

[Shiko200]

I mean game looks good but hows the translation and will it get uncensored?

 

[Shiko200]

Wait a second this is the same dev who made princess project.Holy shit that was a good even and still is after all these years.

 

[Tannin00]

Apparently it contains banned content - the game request was denied with that reasoning last year: Game Requests - Artemis Pearl ~Pirate Princess Rubina and the Phantom Treasure~ 1.10

After a bit of searching, I found the title and even the original story or "part 1," which are two different products.
But what I just want to say is... F95, could you really establish where the rules do and don't apply?

From what I saw in both installments, there are only one or two scenes (in each title) where there are H events with "alleged" shota, and just like I just wrote "shota," no children. And of course, there's no content with the opposite gender, which is easier and more bannable.
In both titles, where there are easily 35 or more scenes and are you telling me that because of one or two scenes that aren't main scenes but optional content, they should be banned from uploading?
Unless "beast" and "strong" are also included on the bannable list because the scenes don't show anything at all in that direction, I don't understand why that installment and part 1 are banned from the page if there is more direct and "strong" content in other titles uploaded to the page.

 

[Rio999]

DLsite reviews says like 95% of the scenes are ugly bastards or grandpas, that true?

 

[Shiko200]

After a bit of searching, I found the title and even the original story or "part 1," which are two different products.
But what I just want to say is... F95, could you really establish where the rules do and don't apply?

From what I saw in both installments, there are only one or two scenes (in each title) where there are H events with "alleged" shota, and just like I just wrote "shota," no children. And of course, there's no content with the opposite gender, which is easier and more bannable.
In both titles, where there are easily 35 or more scenes and are you telling me that because of one or two scenes that aren't main scenes but optional content, they should be banned from uploading?
Unless "beast" and "strong" are also included on the bannable list because the scenes don't show anything at all in that direction, I don't understand why that installment and part 1 are banned from the page if there is more direct and "strong" content in other titles uploaded to the page.

Well many games have been removed over 1 character or scene but at the end of the day rules are rules.

 

[sanshisan]

Because if you go by the tag descriptions, loli or shota doesn't mean pre-pubescent. Loli here is defined as "Girls with undeveloped bodies in sexual situations", which is also often applied to underage, but pubescent, or even some post-pubescent characters.

If you want to read or discuss the difference, there's dozens of threads over in the General Discussions forum that are about this topic.

Exactly, its not loli directly but its a arbitrary description that is still totally loli. Its honestly dumb as fuck because once you do that sort of shit since you can do that with every other descriptor, rendering all possible terms invalid.

Just call them teens or some shit or focus on the body type instead of making up random bullshit. If anything, this implied that f95 needs more tags and better tagging.

Also ewwww yikes general discussions. Thank you but no.

 

[raith]

one thing I will say is that the game has a habit of crashing a lot when doing just about anything. I got a decent rig, so I think the engine used is maybe fucking up due to something regarding the gameplay or animations.

 

[fart1111]

After a bit of searching, I found the title and even the original story or "part 1," which are two different products.
But what I just want to say is... F95, could you really establish where the rules do and don't apply?

From what I saw in both installments, there are only one or two scenes (in each title) where there are H events with "alleged" shota, and just like I just wrote "shota," no children. And of course, there's no content with the opposite gender, which is easier and more bannable.
In both titles, where there are easily 35 or more scenes and are you telling me that because of one or two scenes that aren't main scenes but optional content, they should be banned from uploading?
Unless "beast" and "strong" are also included on the bannable list because the scenes don't show anything at all in that direction, I don't understand why that installment and part 1 are banned from the page if there is more direct and "strong" content in other titles uploaded to the page.

Welcome to F95 moderation. Where some entire shota/loli games can stay up forever, but some games with a single shota/loli scene get removed.

 

[izvraschenec]

Game has some perfomans issues. I had to turn on CPU rendering in config file insted of GPU. Guess my rtx 5070 not enough.

 

[DarkBahamuth]

7gb game and all we get is 6 lousy preview pics that tells us nothing about the gameplay. skip.

Ok, bye!

 

[xmilteach]

thx

 

[9alwa]

You must be registered to see the links

Save here. Bookmark the website as it more often than not have full saves of dl site shortly after releases.

 

[abcadm491]

For some reason I cant break the rock to go to teh second floor in the mines? I can break the others fine

Edit: Did not realize i had to manually start each chapter