Unity Aunt's House [v0.2.1] [AceStudio]

[1tomadeira]

I dunno if it is possible (or if it is already implemented since I've used the previous safe, if yes sorry), but an option to lock the camera and move the mouse would be nice. Sometimes I've ended being with the camera too much to the left or too much too the right, etc, to be able to select the options, since the camera always moves when you use the mouse. Or, when there are options to select a camera lock, I dunno which option is best.

What I'm trying to say is any tool to be able to realign the mouse position with the "head position" of the MC. And again, if it is already implemented then sorry, but I used a save from last playthrough.

 

[Ligmaballss]

how to open door?

 

[Sukme]

how to open door?

Get close enough, put the faint dot in the middle of the screen on the door(will turn white) , press "E".

 

[HugeBeef]

i dont get it, is the game over once you order the cable on sunday or what am i supposed to do?

 

[BlackenedAngel]

i dont get it, is the game over once you order the cable on sunday or what am i supposed to do?

Yeah, that's as far as you can go for now.

 

[elips]

I keep crashing while grabbing the Cheese Chips at the grocery store

same trouble here

 

[tuuri]

Whats the point in releasing something thats this early stage and low on content
This is basically just a very slow intro sequence

 

[IllumiNaughty]

Whats the point in releasing something thats this early stage and low on content
This is basically just a very slow intro sequence

There are plenty of games here that are "in development" and you should know this considering how long you've been here. So why even say this in the first place?

 

[HumbleBumbleBee]

There are plenty of games here that are "in development" and you should know this considering how long you've been here. So why even say this in the first place?

for some reason f95zone keeps attracting the most of angry, bitter individuals and keeps turning good-natured people into arrogants snobs here. I kinda hope this game thread would get spared from it but winning the jackpot in lottery is more likely than that.

 

[Sukme]

Like the art style...bit buggy. Played 1st version and it froze after Aunt showed you the room then left(couldn't unpack/move). Played 2nd and it froze getting the chips. Loaded new fix still froze, deleted the saves and game and loaded a new game and its back to freezing after Aunt shows you the room.

 

[Rhinochoc]

Hi everyone, amazing update as always! The game is progressing well and makes me want to discover more and more! Quick question: was I the only one stuck at the grocery store? I was able to collect everything except the apple; it was impossible to pick up.

 

[tuuri]

There are plenty of games here that are "in development" and you should know this considering how long you've been here. So why even say this in the first place?

This early access apologist shit is so annoying. Theres is no game here, no content.
Its pre-alpha internal testing shit that completely wastes your time.
The answer is patreon money, obviously.

 

[nightmarepiggy]

I see a promising opening scene. I hope there will be some H content in the next update, as there is none in the current version.

 

[Heavy3]

The game might be in a very early stage of development, but there is effort being put in it. This doesn't look like a cash grab. It's free anyway, so why get mad?

 

[nnjagnga333]

So many completely braindead (or more likely shills from the dev's discord) goons are giving it 5 stars for a nearly contentless demo. Who are you people that do this? Why?

The review system is utterly pointless without some kind of ACTUAL moderation of it. Reviews shouldn't even be open for this.

 

[governor argie]

Game freezes when "Start to unpack/ start with laptop" quest pops up, there's still audio but I can't really move.

 

[punchsparrow]

what's the button to crouch again?

 

[johnsgruf]

So many completely braindead (or more likely shills from the dev's discord) goons are giving it 5 stars for a nearly contentless demo. Who are you people that do this? Why?

The review system is utterly pointless without some kind of ACTUAL moderation of it. Reviews shouldn't even be open for this.

I disagree with you. It is obvious that a 5 star rating for this demo is not comparable to the 5 stars of a complete and structured game. Each review is based to the category.
Probably to avoid wasting time, a "demo" or "alpha" tag should be added so as to improve the distinction.

There are no shills of the programmer. This game (or rather, DEMO) is undoubtedly original. Something innovative and intriguing. The developer deserves the compliments he receving. Those who put 5 stars are hoping that this startup becomes something concrete as soon as possible.
The emotions transmitted by the programmer must be recognized and rewarded, even if it is for a banal prototype.

 

[nnjagnga333]

I disagree with you. It is obvious that a 5 star rating for this demo is not comparable to the 5 stars of a complete and structured game. Each review is based to the category.
Probably to avoid wasting time, a "demo" or "alpha" tag should be added so as to improve the distinction.

There are no shills of the programmer. This game (or rather, DEMO) is undoubtedly original. Something innovative and intriguing. The developer deserves the compliments he receving. Those who put 5 stars are hoping that this startup becomes something concrete as soon as possible.
The emotions transmitted by the programmer must be recognized and rewarded, even if it is for a banal prototype.

The purpose of a review is to inform. 5 stars for literally nothing is a joke - a complete inversion of the purpose, delivering severely wrong information and making people think there is something worth their time here. It is a lie. Any 5 star review for an empty, buggy demo is a lie. This demo is not original at all. It is a generic VN played in first person. Walking simulators are not new.

"those who put 5 stars are hoping" - proving my point. They are basing their review off their own imagination, not reality. They are lying. "The emotions transmitted by the programmer must be recognized" - that's what comments are for. Only actual results deserve high reviews. A review is not to jerk off the developer. A review is to inform consumers.

As for the actual quality of reviews - the number of reviews is much higher than average. The quality of reviews is much lower than typical as well. Multiple extremely generic and short "I like it 5 stars" type bullshit reviews indicate shills.

 

[HumbleBumbleBee]

The purpose of a review is to inform. 5 stars for literally nothing is a joke - a complete inversion of the purpose, delivering severely wrong information and making people think there is something worth their time here. It is a lie. Any 5 star review for an empty, buggy demo is a lie. This demo is not original at all. It is a generic VN played in first person. Walking simulators are not new.

"those who put 5 stars are hoping" - proving my point. They are basing their review off their own imagination, not reality. They are lying. "The emotions transmitted by the programmer must be recognized" - that's what comments are for. Only actual results deserve high reviews. A review is not to jerk off the developer. A review is to inform consumers.

As for the actual quality of reviews - the number of reviews is much higher than average. The quality of reviews is much lower than typical as well. Multiple extremely generic and short "I like it 5 stars" type bullshit reviews indicate shills.

Prove your point and cast your own review into it for the game only. Ignore the meta of how people review. You're just pointing out how flawed direct democracy is even without politics.

Don't forget to start with a disclaimer what version you played as you type out your review