No, it's paywalled; but I did see a post from August that they changed artists. :/did you guys see the status report on patreon? the new art looks so bad
Seems like someone doesn't quite understand what they got. The art for the current game has a vibe that sells the freeuse idea. Her not looking like she was supposed to be a figure for a porn game is kinda the point. Being entirely professional/oblivious, but going nuts from being fucked, but never acknowledging the guys fucking her. That's why the sketchy style was so good. The save new style with the sly "yeah, I am a slut hehe"-grin on every face misses the mark.did you guys see the status report on patreon? the new art looks so bad
Yeah, I agree, the more slender but still curvy original art style fit the game better by a lot! The new art seems not only more cartoony but also like it's trying too hard to make her more "dummy thicc" in a generic hentai girl sort of way. Hope they'll decide to try harder to match the original art style, though I get that it can be hard when having to switch artists mid-project.did you guys see the status report on patreon? the new art looks so bad
I think they were referring to the new art. I think I read somewhere that dp got someone to help them with art, which may be the reason. I'm pretty sure they know what the art is meant to entail - the idea of free use - I just don't think they like the quality of it. (obligatory "but idk though")Seems like someone doesn't quite understand what they got. The art for the current game has a vibe that sells the freeuse idea. Her not looking like she was supposed to be a figure for a porn game is kinda the point. Being entirely professional/oblivious, but going nuts from being fucked, but never acknowledging the guys fucking her. That's why the sketchy style was so good. The save new style with the sly "yeah, I am a slut hehe"-grin on every face misses the mark.
That shit is HUGE in a game with so little assets, story and gameplay. If the vibes are off, the whole thing crumbles.
What prompted you to say these things? Do you make a habit of making negative assumptions and explaining your negative assumptions?These levels are going to be paywalled I assume?
(typically) Can't get pirated versions of games if the games developer hosts the thread. Unless they're a cool Dev.
The game has already had paywalled content, which has already turned people off in this forum. As for the second line, The likeliness of a dev posting their work that they get money for on patreon to F95 for free is low, which is why forums made by people who aren't the dev is (to me) perferredWhat prompted you to say these things? Do you make a habit of making negative assumptions and explaining your negative assumptions?
First of all, there's nothing stopping people from dropping a Patreon version themselves. We don't have the Patreon version because no on shared it. Secondly, regardless of how much the dev makes or how much you like the game, the dev doesn't owe you this courtesy. I don't know why people act like it's a crime for the dev to incentivize Patreon subscriptions. You're preemptively lashing out at a dev over content you assume won't be available to you, which you already aren't entitled to in the first place. I don't know why you're active passive aggressive over this. Yes, the dev could share it, but so can you. But you didn't. You're mad because minor content that's meant to be paid for isn't available to you for free.The game has already had paywalled content, which has already turned people off in this forum. As for the second line, The likeliness of a dev posting their work that they get money for on patreon to F95 for free is low, which is why forums made by people who aren't the dev is (to me) perferred
The game has already had paywalled content, which has already turned people off in this forum. As for the second line, The likeliness of a dev posting their work that they get money for on patreon to F95 for free is low, which is why forums made by people who aren't the dev is (to me) perferred
Nothing is stopping anyone correct, and I get why pay walled content is a route. The first time paywalled content was introduced to this game it was barely finished, there was bugs, and only a singular level. People didn't like it for those reasons, the dev posted it as a update to the thread but no one here could access they new content since they posted a public build, not the patron one.First of all, there's nothing stopping people from dropping a Patreon version themselves. We don't have the Patreon version because no on shared it. Secondly, regardless of how much the dev makes or how much you like the game, the dev doesn't owe you this courtesy. I don't know why people act like it's a crime for the dev to incentivize Patreon subscriptions. You're preemptively lashing out at a dev over content you assume won't be available to you, which you already aren't entitled to in the first place. I don't know why you're active passive aggressive over this. Yes, the dev could share it, but so can you. But you didn't. You're mad because minor content that's meant to be paid for isn't available to you for free.
Do you understand how insane that sounds?
So you're acknowledging that anyone can drop the Patreon version, but didn't, but you also think that the thread being hosted by someone else means we'll somehow have the Patreon version?Nothing is stopping anyone correct, and I get why pay walled content is a route.
...
Again, nothing is stopping them sure, what's stopping a restaurant from just giving you food for free? They have no incentive to give us the patreon build as it would be a bad idea. This is why I personally like the host of the thread to not be the dev.
No. What he's saying is, if the thread is hosted by the dev, there's virtually no chance of the Patreon version being linked here (even if it was leaked). And that's legitimate reasoning, which I fully agree with. Exceptions like Something Unlimited only prove the rule.So you're acknowledging that anyone can drop the Patreon version, but didn't, but you also think that the thread being hosted by someone else means we'll somehow have the Patreon version?
And releasing it when the dev isn't in charge of the thread is somehow better on their mental health and motivation? I find that very hard to believe.No. What he's saying is, if the thread is hosted by the dev, there's virtually no chance of the Patreon version being linked here (even if it was leaked). And that's legitimate reasoning, which I fully agree with. Exceptions like Something Unlimited only prove the rule.
On the other hand, if the dev is really hosting the thread, the bugs tend to be fixed much faster and the game is more polished because of a better contact with players. So both solutions have their pros and cons.
I don't like the games with paywalled contents at all, I much prefer the timeline route for Patreon, where the patrons get the same version everyone else does, just earlier. However, just as with the paywalled content, this route may be easily spoiled by someone leaking the Patreon version. And that's something developers tend to get discouraged by. A discouraged developer is the single worst thing that can happen to a game, as this usually means the game is dead.
TL;DR: if you want the game to be complete and good, don't leak the Patreon version, and don't encourage it.
Well, if the dev is not involved (or even present) here, (s)he may not even be aware of the game being leaked, so the leak wouldn't directly affect their health (mental or physical) and/or motivation. It would, however, impact their income, and that may lead to reduced motivation (for sure) and health (eventually).And releasing it when the dev isn't in charge of the thread is somehow better on their mental health and motivation? I find that very hard to believe.