- Aug 4, 2020
- 1,562
- 8,473
Post nut clarity maybe?then it's really not make sense why MC would refuse the superior Nicole
- Thread starter N7
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 3dcg anal sex animated big ass big tits cheating combat creampie dating sim exhibitionism female domination female protagonist footjob graphic violence groping group sex handjob humiliation humor interracial lesbian male protagonist management masturbation milf multiple protagonist oral sex point & click prostitution puzzle romance sandbox sex toys spanking strategy stripping teasing titfuck turn based combat vaginal sex virgin voyeurism
- Jan 16, 2023
- 1,848
- 3,360
I agree with what you're suggesting, but that wouldn't necessarily mean that the other LI aren't carrying any STD's though. Unless you chose the path of celibacy.
Sry, I'm bored.
- Apr 28, 2020
- 1,577
- 9,499
you can, but that would require adding science fiction elements to the story or DPC being japanese
It does mean that. You can have sex with everyone except Nora in a Jill playthrough, so that means everyone is clean. Or at least they didn't pass anything to the MC up until that point.I agree with what you're suggesting, but that wouldn't necessarily mean that the other LI aren't carrying any STD's though. Unless you chose the path of celibacy.
Sry, I'm bored.
Well, most tests aren't conclusive until six months after having relations, so he can still have somthing, but this applies to all paths. This is a stretch, though.
- Jan 16, 2023
- 1,848
- 3,360
I haven't been paying much attention to these threads lately, But thx for telling me that Nora is a Jill cock-block. Good to know, thx lol
*EDIT*
I just aired out my brain-fart, I just realized why You can't do both Nora and Jill. I just remembered that bar scene if you're on Jill's path.. my bad.. Aparently I'm not only bored, but in a state brainlessness lol
- Jan 9, 2021
- 2,008
- 2,867
Either way an STD test only confirms the condition at that time.... You can get infected after that.... It's not like you're immune after taking a test that comes out negative... And sorry to say so... But not all STD's actually need sex to be transmitted...
Some can even walk around freely and are named "Dawe"....
- Jan 16, 2023
- 1,848
- 3,360
- Aug 31, 2020
- 26
- 67
It's a bit like dalli theory that Melanie and Sarah are being sent by M&J and Derek to test the MC's fidelity. Same with Swyper, Derek installed it to MC to check if he is faithful. I think DPC will not change so many events just for one path.
Edit: Or maybe it was that Melanie and Sarah themselves wanted to fuck the MC in order to snitch on him to M&J, comes out similar.
Edit: Or maybe it was that Melanie and Sarah themselves wanted to fuck the MC in order to snitch on him to M&J, comes out similar.
Last edited:
- Jun 2, 2017
- 2,476
- 7,443
Am I the only one who feels like F95 needs a reaction of wtf??? just for Dalli??
- Jun 7, 2019
- 433
- 872
I see the funny possibility that ninja will be Dereck's *son* in future.
- Jan 16, 2023
- 1,848
- 3,360
Yeah... This is not now logic works. The proper logic would be you get an STD variable when you have sex and the STD test reads that variable to tell you if you have it or not. What you're saying makes zero literal logic sense... I always though you bent logic with your theories for fun but I'm questioning everything here. You either are a master troll or have zero reasoning skills. And I'm leaning towards the former, so I'm leaving it here...
- Jan 16, 2023
- 1,848
- 3,360
I think it's just a question of you're both not considering the other's point of view and where you're coming from.
Dali is coming from a position of more of a behind the scenes programing variables already established prior to the test itself.
IE:
$STD_test_positive = "true/false"; already determined by the game itself.
And you Wizard are coming from a position with a view of the real world outlook.
This isn't a jab at either one of you, I just think it's a question of not quite seeing the other's point of view in the proper perspective. nothing more.
But I am considering his viewpoint. I've played D&D and sometimes you can give the players the illusion of choice. No matter what they choose you can make it so the same thing happens eventually. This works because the players don't know this and what could happen if they choose the other option is unknowable, and this is the key part. In a game like this you couldn't do this type of things without making a plothole or just bad writing. I even made a proper programming logic on how this would work properly.I think it's just a question of you're both not considering the other's point of view and where you're coming from.
Dali is coming from a position of more of a behind the scenes programing variables already established prior to the test itself.
IE:
$STD_test_positive = "true/false"; already determined by the game itself.
And you Wizard are coming from a position with a view of the real world outlook.
This isn't a jab at either one of you, I just think it's a question of not quite seeing the other's point of view in the proper perspective. nothing more.
"DPC would have to add that STD variable for every time the MC has sex".
Yeah... That's how it would work. Or at least add one on the relevant parts (or many unused ones so preople checking the code wouldn't get any ideas) Just check if he had sex on one specific moment... How would you manage if the test ended up being positive?
In the end it doesn't matter which one is more efficient or not. That would be another debate. The part I'm discussing is that the MC is clean at the end of episode 8.
Last edited:
- Nov 11, 2022
- 3,127
- 10,366
Is it allowed to talk about reviews here, because the newest one is just too funny.
- Jan 16, 2023
- 1,848
- 3,360
Ultimately, I think this particular debate is somewhat pointless because when the script loads up whether from chapter #1 or later on. Because typically variables are not always set at the start of a script, but usually they are 'sanitized' to prevent variable corruption down the road as the script performs.
So the STD variable could very well be already set from the get go as "false" until you sack Air head Arieth (I don't even know if that's even possible in the game as I just never liked that twat, so even if she was a possible LI, I still wouldn't touch her with a mile long pole).
And if Arieth is accessible then it's not much to add a line at the end of that hypothetical Arieth encounter like
$STD_clean = "False";
And that's the only extra code required to make that happen. and if you wanted to get creative you can even create a condition of getting treated for it
If ($STD_clean = "false" && $STD_treatment ="false")
then ($MC_LOSES_ALL_TEETH_AND_GROW_THIRD_ARM_AND_3_NOSES = "true");
and end up with all sorts of hilarity
Point is, programing-wise this isn't much to add to the code to make happen, where it gets complicated is with the scenes and renders. that's mostly where the heavy game work rests.
So the STD variable could very well be already set from the get go as "false" until you sack Air head Arieth (I don't even know if that's even possible in the game as I just never liked that twat, so even if she was a possible LI, I still wouldn't touch her with a mile long pole).
And if Arieth is accessible then it's not much to add a line at the end of that hypothetical Arieth encounter like
$STD_clean = "False";
And that's the only extra code required to make that happen. and if you wanted to get creative you can even create a condition of getting treated for it
If ($STD_clean = "false" && $STD_treatment ="false")
then ($MC_LOSES_ALL_TEETH_AND_GROW_THIRD_ARM_AND_3_NOSES = "true");
and end up with all sorts of hilarity
Point is, programing-wise this isn't much to add to the code to make happen, where it gets complicated is with the scenes and renders. that's mostly where the heavy game work rests.
- Oct 20, 2019
- 1,769
- 10,142
Nah, it needs a donation button for us to donate every time we get amazed or facepalmed by that brain of his.
Than again, Dalli already has
You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
- Jan 9, 2021
- 2,008
- 2,867
I think he's just being a dick.... But at least he gave 2 stars, he could have given only 1...
- Jan 16, 2023
- 1,848
- 3,360
I had to go check what you were referring.. I'll admit, that is a pretty fucking funny rating rant lol
Not quite certain he's aware he can *BE* a total dick lol
- Nov 11, 2022
- 3,127
- 10,366
But did you know, that "Being a DIK" is "Full of feminist views and agendas"?I think he's just being a dick.... But at least he gave 2 stars, he could have given only 1...