With over 5000 pages someone must have said it already but what if the reason the second picture appears to be in B&W is that it's faded due to age and that it's actually of Jill's mum and sister?
Probably to signify that it's an older picture, the symbolism of nostalgia, and all that.
From a more realistic slant, it could be the polaroid camera has a black and white setting.
But let's be honest.
I think the picture with Jill is Bella. Compare the eyebrows. I can also be mistaken. But the eyebrows are damn similar.
And on the picture Jill is at least 4 or 5 years old.
The one holding up the little girl on their shoulders is most definitely not Bella. Her entire facial structure is different to Bella's. Also, I'd say young Jill looks to be about 8 or 9 here.
So if it really is Jill's sister, then it doesn't fit with the age difference of Jill and MC either. On the picture Jill is at least 4 years old and Jill and MC are not so far apart.
It does fit. Jill and the MC are only 2 years apart and, as I said, Jill looks more like she's about 8 or 9 in that picture. Her sister here looks to be about 16-18 and the age gap between them is entirely possible. I knew a girl way back when I was in school whose parents had their 4th daughter when she was 12.
Jill's parents could be much older than the MC's, or at least his Mom who was only about 18 or 20 when she had him and Neil was closer to 30. Jill's 21 now and if her sister was at least 8 years older than her, then her parents could be at least 47, and that's perfectly feasible.
No but it being an old photo of Jill's mum and sister, possibly taken by Jill herself using her mum's Polaroid (the same one Jill has during the picnic) does fit.
That's another possibility, in which case the young girl being not much older than Jill would fit quite well. However, the young girl looks like the Jill model with the
You must be registered to see the links
morph applied to it, so I'd still say it's her and her sister.