- Jan 9, 2021
- 2,008
- 2,867
There is no such thing (or should I say "It's very rare") like extreme straight /gay.
Good old Kinsey proved it long ago.
“Critics are justified in their objections that many of the most interesting and provocative statements in the [Kinsey 1948] book are not based on the data presented therein, and it is not made clear to the reader on what evidence the statements are based. Further, the conclusions drawn from data presented in the book are often stated by KPM [Kinsey, Pomeroy, and Martin] in much too bold and confident a manner. Taken cumulatively, these objections amount to saying that much of the writing in the book falls below the level of good scientific writing.”its interesting and i should probobly read it but i... ummm .
( i have to help my landlady for better RP)
You must be registered to see the links
Two main problems cited were that significant portions of the samples come from prison populations and male prostitutes, and that people who volunteer to be interviewed about
You must be registered to see the links
subject are likely to create a
You must be registered to see the links
. Both undermine the usefulness of the sample in terms of determining the tendencies of the overall population."A random selection of three people would have been better than a group of 300 chosen by Mr. Kinsey."
You must be registered to see the links
Reading it makes clear a theory proven by interviewing 300 persons ,of wich a majority were either in prison or male prostitutes, does not give a realistic presentation....
It's like trying to determine the percentage alcoholics for the entire nation by interviewing only the homeless and people in bars....