- Aug 9, 2017
- 2,859
- 13,502
And again, you are wrong. I gave you those two rules because DPC is using them in this very game. Only n00b dev would change something as important as the way he/she depicts flashbacks.Flashback makes much more sens(at least to me) than adding another,unrelated person,and Tommy`s arm holding,being an effect of unrelated drug use.
Agree with the first point - making sure your audience knows it is a flashback,is a good idea,otherwise you`re risking ending up CONFUSING your audience
Second point is not a rule of thumb,different visual effect can but don`t have to be applied,it usually is used as one of the means of letting the audience know that it is a flashback.
When MC's dad doing a flashback story, we see MC's mum and her father as characters with empty scenes - just white or black background.
But, let's say DPC forgot how to be a professional and he decided to completely change the way he depicts certain things.
So, lialialia202020 is obsessed with the idea that the scene was a flashback of the time Tommy first time took the drug... Should I mention a well-known thing that Tommy was junkie probably since kindergarten - and we know that from Josy? Or should I point you to watch that scene and tell me when he did take a drug? Because we didn't see that.
But, we're going even further with accusing DPC of being complete n00b - after he already changed the way, in the middle of the game, how to show flashbacks. Let's say everything above is true, although, by now, it should be clear it's a completely unlogical mess.
So, DPC forgot how he did flashback before and he is giving us a flashback of Tommy's first time taking drug?! I won't even mention illogical dialogue with Quinn. No - you just accused DPC of not being able to tell the story.
When you're doing flashbacks, they're important for the story, for MC... And here? Who cares about Tommy's first drug use?! That's absolutely unimportant to the story. By that logic, 0.3 could start with the scene when Riona first time swam in the sea.
Or in James Bond movie - after 007 kills some bad guy, we would get a flashback of that guy last holidays when he was skiing in the Alps.
Do you see how nonsensical that is?