- Jul 7, 2017
- 542
- 2,223
Why would the article include her anyways? Tybalt is in the picture they used and only referenced once to identify him in a "shown above is X, Y and Z" manner. He isn't a part of the story they're writing and neither is Sage. You're acting like it was an article about the family as a whole which makes Sage's absence notable.Where is this "Sage does not want to be associated with her adopted parents" idea coming from? Didn't she explicitly say that she is very grateful to have been adopted by them (and as a result want to share the gift of helping with others)?
It's extremely insulting to a parent that their daughter does not want to be associated with them. That runs full counter to the idea that Sage is grateful for what they did.
Also, reporting doesn't work that way. If Burke can't get the newspaper to remove the allegation regarding suspected scholarship misconduct, there's little chance he can get the paper to remove Sage. Similar for Sage, what she wants doesn't really matter to the paper.
Perhaps DPC omitted her to avoid outing her parents... maybe DPC included Tybalt just to make the "they spelled his name wrong" comments to show the Preps don't really respect him at all. Either way it isn't some gaping plot hole that a local newspaper that small enough to have an entire section devoted to a specific universities news didn't source a photograph of the entire family for an article that had nothing to do with the children in question.