Alice won't talk to me, so I can't trigger the event.I believe the whole cycle starts on the weekend so you need to catch him on Monday and Wednesday after they accuse you of stealing the wallet.
Alice won't talk to me, so I can't trigger the event.I believe the whole cycle starts on the weekend so you need to catch him on Monday and Wednesday after they accuse you of stealing the wallet.
No, that's why I am asking how you get to that conclusion:you really think ANY Dev values the opinion of low tier subs MORE than the high ones?
The polls are a "democratic process" I suppose, but no high-tier patron ever voices their opinion and are just happy to pay silently?
Can you enlighten me? Where do you get the data from to make such a statemen? Judging from your previous answer I guess there is no such table.It's kind of funny though, that the people who pay the biggest subscriptions (and consequently choose where the game leads to), are the ones getting punished in the end.
If you are on war path he also needs to accuse you of theft. That happened on Thursday. The "Good Bye Eric" event triggered on next monday, but I think it can trigger on any day of the week". Remember that Alice needs to sleep naked for it to happen.Is there a day he does that on specifically? That hasn't triggered for some reason.
I WAS wondering what happens if Alice is not sleeping naked after one got accused. I guess that's how you get to the alternatve route in the living room.Alice won't talk to me, so I can't trigger the event.
I think this guy answered your question before you even asked. Do you have any data that suggest the opposite?No, that's why I am asking how you get to that conclusion:
Can you enlighten me? Where do you get the data from to make such a statemen? Judging from your previous answer I guess there is no such table.
So how do you know what the silent payers want or the "ones who pay the biggest subscriptions and consequently choose where the game leads to"?
Where do you get your data from?
Patreon poll results are given in a spredsheet of every vote including a $tier column. So, the dev has this info at least.
No I don't but I dont' make such conclusions, so I don't need it. Question is if YOU have access to such.Do you have any data that suggest the opposite?
The results speak for themselves anyway in many games not only this one.. how many games have been derailed by the wishes of high paying patrons and ended up a mess?
ByeBye nemo, focus on click and go until the end of the world, playing the same game with 2 little different images every 6,5 months,ok ... we will have some other things to do... he cant do it man
again, you seem to have trouble understanding basic english.. read my reply again.. slowly, and try to comprehend what i'm saying.. if you still can't, try to translate it to your native tongue.. i can't help you beyond that..No I don't but I dont' make such conclusions, so I don't need it. Question is if YOU have access to such.
If not, then your statement is nothing but a hunch.
Also now you say that the high paying patrons who decide. Previously you said they are the ones who got punished.
Who can't explain or is missing arguments tells others that they don't understand.again, you seem to have trouble understanding basic english.. read my reply again.. slowly, and try to comprehend what i'm saying.. if you still can't, try to translate it to your native tongue.. i can't help you beyond that..
what kind of data are u asking for? U want me to send you the patreon spreadsheets or want me to hack into the Dev's account and give you his bank statement? what kind of proof do u need?Who can't explain or is missing arguments tells others that they don't understand.
Your making assumptions and have no actual data for your statement, I get it. No need to get defensive and insulting.
He asked you the question and you have not answered it at all. Maybe you should read the question again and then actually compose a reply instead of trying to distract.again, you seem to have trouble understanding basic english.. read my reply again.. slowly, and try to comprehend what i'm saying.. if you still can't, try to translate it to your native tongue.. i can't help you beyond that..
No, it was a statement of fact. And you have offered nothing to prove said statement.And again, it's my opinion, you can take it or leave it..
Disproving the first part of the sentence in the second part of the sentence.i haven't insulted you personally, it's obvious you have trouble understanding my replies
If you already did that, why not. If you didn't, that means that you don't have any data, as I assumed.what kind of data are u asking for? U want me to send you the patreon spreadsheets or want me to hack into the Dev's account and give you his bank statement? what kind of proof do u need?
Didn't you just prove my "assumption" is correct? If only high tier patrons get to choose on the one significant poll, how does this disprove my point?Go through the patreon feed for Aleksey, there was only 1 polls this year that was only for $30 Patreons, all others were on cosmetic details (more outfits for Ann while doing yoga, old graphics or new graphics, more horror movies for Lisa) and open for all Patreons. I am excluding the 2 polls for the "Miss <month>" renders since those have nothing to do with the game.
No, your original statement was that the high tiers get punished. That's what was written in your first post I was asking about.And again, what am I to prove exactly? That high tiers have more influence than low ones?
A statement of fact? Really? Did I issue a Government approved document to go along with my official "Statement" as well? I'll be sure to do that next time..No, it was a statement of fact. And you have offered nothing to prove said statement.
You cannot go "In my opinion the earth is flat, you have to respect my opinion!", that's not how any of this works.
Disproving the first part of the sentence in the second part of the sentence.
Yes, they get punished along with the rest by getting underwhelming updates of a game they pay highly for. Is that so difficult to understand?No, your original statement was that the high tiers get punished. That's what was written in your first post I was asking about.
The one poll for $30 Patrons is titled "Preview selection..." from 15/4/2021.Didn't you just prove my "assumption" is correct? If only high tier patrons get to choose on the one significant poll, how does this disprove my point?
And again, what am I to prove exactly? That high tiers have more influence than low ones? Ah yes, what a ridiculous "Logical Fallacy"