4.80 star(s) 5 Votes

RadtheMan

Member
Aug 5, 2019
218
229
192
The original, strict definition of futa is a woman with a cock and a pussy. As more content has developed over time, the pussy requirement has faded; under this understanding, a futa has always been considered female, presumably from birth, and has needed no interventions to be a woman - she just has a cock instead of a pussy. This differentiates her from a trans woman, even if their anatomy and hormones would be otherwise identical.
 

kostello

Newbie
Aug 3, 2017
49
94
132
because futa is a made-up word, which has cock and vagina (and sometimes balls), and a trans girl would just make her with a cock and balls
If it looks like a woman (feminine body type, wide hips, female face) but she has a cock it's a dickgirl. Dickgirls are classified as futa characters almost everywhere.

If it looks like a man with fake tits and make-up then yeah, it's not futa.

In this case it's a 100% dickgirl (female body+schlong). But who the fuck uses 'dickgirl' anymore? And in my reality dickgirls are more futa than trans. This is a subjective thoughts on a fictional biology, so I may be wrong, I don't care.
 
Last edited:

Richard Perkins

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2017
1,305
778
386
As you wrong and I understand the dilemma, but a transgirl is just a transgirl, not a futa, and should be recognized as one.
 

Fazed

Well-Known Member
Nov 21, 2018
1,982
4,405
490
even if their anatomy and hormones would be otherwise identical.
The hormones wouldnt be identical. If they were there would be no need to transition and hence there would be no "trans". Just saying.
 

dav121

Well-Known Member
Oct 13, 2016
1,443
1,420
445
can you please drop the sissifcation tag? It's clear the character is completely sissified by the 1st scene
 
4.80 star(s) 5 Votes