4.50 star(s) 2 Votes

Balddog

Member
Mar 3, 2021
386
370
186



Seeing this screenshot with Afrobull's pictures hanging all over the room as product placement, reminds me of the Anime/Manga Inuyashiki. Cause the secondary main character in that show/manga loved Gantz so much that he had Gantz product all over just like this. I find it kinda hilarious. (The creator of Gantz is the same creator for Inuyashiki. Both good series btw.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lich-Lord457

BeholdTheWizzard

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,412
1,178
283
Cute girlfailure turns into a Futa with a cute genie friend?
No, not a futa.
People really need to learn what words mean ffs.


Why “futa” got broadened

  1. Localization shortcuts:
    When western sites and translators first imported hentai in the early 2000s, “futanari” was the only available Japanese tag that vaguely fit “girls with penises.”
    Instead of creating separate tags, everything with a female body and penis was lumped under futa.
    Over time, even works that were actually trans, shemale, or trap were mislabeled.
  2. Algorithmic tagging:
    Western adult sites later auto-imported these early tags. Since “futanari” got the most traffic, it became a catch-all for “female-presenting + penis,” regardless of anatomy or context.
  3. Loss of context:
    The subtle distinctions that Japanese fandom used (e.g., futanari vs. otoko no ko vs. nyotai-ka) didn’t translate well.
    Western users tended to simplify them all under “futa” for convenience.

Why it’s a logical mess

You’re absolutely right that, logically:


  • Trans characters (gender transition theme) ≠ futanari
  • Traps / otoko no ko (feminine boys) ≠ futanari
  • Shemale / dickgirl (Western porn terms) ≠ futanari
  • True futanari (original) = biologically dual-sex (vagina + penis)

So, when “futa” becomes the umbrella for all of these, it erases precision — both for creators and for viewers trying to filter content.
 
Last edited:

Suminohana

Member
Aug 27, 2023
359
339
90
I know for a fact that Bull drew a proper futanari with both sets once. I don't know if it was a request or someone held them at gunpoint for it, but they never did it again.
Because futas with pussies look ugly and frankly a bit anatomically disgusting. It was only a thing outside of Japan for a short period of time when western artists were still copying japanese ones.
 

BeholdTheWizzard

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,412
1,178
283
Because futas with pussies look ugly and frankly a bit anatomically disgusting. It was only a thing outside of Japan for a short period of time when western artists were still copying japanese ones.
A woman with a vagain looks disgusting... but having big hairy balls is attractive to you?
Whever you are smoking fried your brain beyond repair.
 

Buddysvata

Newbie
Jan 21, 2022
70
120
156
Because futas with pussies look ugly and frankly a bit anatomically disgusting. It was only a thing outside of Japan for a short period of time when western artists were still copying japanese ones.
Getting told nonsensical make-believe by randos really is what makes these forums so fun.
 
  • Yay, update!
Reactions: Meaning

Suminohana

Member
Aug 27, 2023
359
339
90
A woman with a vagain looks disgusting... but having big hairy balls is attractive to you?
Whever you are smoking fried your brain beyond repair.
If you want a woman with a vagina just get a regular woman, problem solved
People want futas with cock and balls, not with anatomically absurd pussies and ball-less cocks or something
 

BeholdTheWizzard

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,412
1,178
283
If you want a woman with a vagina just get a regular woman, problem solved
People want futas with cock and balls, not with anatomically absurd pussies and ball-less cocks or something

You knowledge of anatomy and biology is non-existent.
Balls on a futa would just get in the way. Their positioning is inconvenient and they block the view of the pussy, hence why them being intenal makes much more sense.
I have no idea what you mean with "anatomtically absurd pussies", you probably never saw a real pussy to begin with. If you did and actually understand biology, you would know a clitan penis are the same, the only difference is scale and urinal canal. One of the reason clit is so sensitive is because it's basically the tip/glans of an undeveloped micro-penis.

Yes, you want to suck cocks, gurgle balls and find vaginas disgusting - we get it, you're gay. You don't have to hammer it in
 

Suminohana

Member
Aug 27, 2023
359
339
90
You knowledge of anatomy and biology is non-existent.
Balls on a futa would just get in the way. Their positioning is inconvenient and they block the view of the pussy, hence why them being intenal makes much more sense.
>internal balls
It's called eggs
I have no idea what you mean with "anatomtically absurd pussies", you probably never saw a real pussy to begin with.
If there's a pussy and a cock, it's anatomically absurd, hope this helps
If you did and actually understand biology, you would know a clitan penis are the same, the only difference is scale and urinal canal. One of the reason clit is so sensitive is because it's basically the tip/glans of an undeveloped micro-penis.
I don't know how is this relevant to the conversation, unless you're saying you like to see giant clits, which is kinda weird
Yes, you want to suck cocks, gurgle balls and find vaginas disgusting - we get it, you're gay. You don't have to hammer it in
No, I want to see girls with cocks, and if you have a cock, then you must have balls, else you look like an abomination. Your weirdly defensive stance about this makes me believe you're the one having doubts regarding your tastes... just saying. Never seen someone so scared of seeing a pair of balls. It's like you want a token pussy on them just to convince yourself of something. Which is fine, man, I just think it's kinda weird to call someone gay for wanting to see a girl with a cock fucking a woman. Is heterosexual sex gay now? You see, there's a pair of balls on the screen. That makes it gay.
 

BeholdTheWizzard

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,412
1,178
283
If there's a pussy and a cock, it's anatomically absurd, hope this helps
Absurd to you, but you are ignorant and what you base your view on is wrong. You do not understand anatomy, you just use the word without any understanding of the human body, the underlying tissues, musculature, nor the biomechanics involved.

I don't know how is this relevant to the conversation, unless you're saying you like to see giant clits, which is kinda weird
If you do not see how this is relevant given the context of the discussion, then there's no point in discussing anything with you, if even such a simple concept is beyond your understanding.


No, I want to see girls with cocks, and if you have a cock, then you must have balls, else you look like an abomination. Your weirdly defensive stance about this makes me believe you're the one having doubts regarding your tastes... just saying. Never seen someone so scared of seeing a pair of balls. It's like you want a token pussy on them just to convince yourself of something. Which is fine, man, I just think it's kinda weird to call someone gay for wanting to see a girl with a cock fucking a woman. Is heterosexual sex gay now? You see, there's a pair of balls on the screen. That makes it gay.
"girl with cock"... It's not a girl if there is no vagina. And it's tto a futa either if there is no vagina - PER DEFINITION.
What you are fapping to is a shemale/trans/dickgirl.
Pick your poison, it ain't a woman.
The one lying to themselves is you. You are attracted to the masculine, I'm attracted to the feminine. We are not the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeakCode

Futahar

Member
Apr 17, 2023
269
532
203
Absurd to you, but you are ignorant and what you base your view on is wrong. You do not understand anatomy, you just use the word without any understanding of the human body, the underlying tissues, musculature, nor the biomechanics involved.



If you do not see how this is relevant given the context of the discussion, then there's no point in discussing anything with you, if even such a simple concept is beyond your understanding.




"girl with cock"... It's not a girl if there is no vagina. And it's tto a futa either if there is no vagina - PER DEFINITION.
What you are fapping to is a shemale/trans/dickgirl.
Pick your poison, it ain't a woman.
The one lying to themselves is you. You are attracted to the masculine, I'm attracted to the feminine. We are not the same.
Jeues christ dude you and LeakCode would get along with all the futa debates.
 

LeakCode

Member
Nov 30, 2018
476
416
187
Jeues christ dude you and LeakCode would get along with all the futa debates.
I don't know why you brought me in. But females must carry eggs and give birth. That's how female is defined in biology, not just on humans but also plants.

There is no restrictions on whether futas are female or male. Futas just have to have a vagina, and a dick. Because that's how it all started. Futanari just means two form. It started without balls too so by default they should have no balls but hey what can I do about some guys intruding on someone else's space.

As for GIRL futas, yes, not only do they need a vagina, they also must have no testicles, including internal ones. Carrying testicles makes them male because now they play the role of inseminating another one to make babies.

Wanting to see girls with sausage is weird in general, we all are weird by default for being here and waiting for any kind of progress. Welcome to the club.
As for anatomy, having balls covering vagina is actually the incorrect anatomy.

See wikipedia for example. When both scortum and an opening are present, the scrotum would be on the side because scrotum is the analog of labia, which is on the side of the vagina.


But hey, it's all fantasy, they can draw however way they want. We just don't have to like it and people should know the what's reality when they claimthings are "wrong" or "right". There just needs to be a proper filter to filter these things out so my eyes don't bleed.
 
Last edited:
4.50 star(s) 2 Votes