
happened to my buddy last weekGirl orders toy. Wrong toy arrives, girl uses toys anyways. BAM Genie and a cock. The usual.
It's not the lack of immagination, rather lack of education.Afrobull and calling shemales futanari, because they lack the imagination for two sets of genitals.
It indeed is the usual.
I know for a fact that Bull drew a proper futanari with both sets once. I don't know if it was a request or someone held them at gunpoint for it, but they never did it again.It's not the lack of immagination, rather lack of education.
No, not a futa.Cute girlfailure turns into a Futa with a cute genie friend?
Why “futa” got broadened
- Localization shortcuts:
When western sites and translators first imported hentai in the early 2000s, “futanari” was the only available Japanese tag that vaguely fit “girls with penises.”
Instead of creating separate tags, everything with a female body and penis was lumped under futa.
Over time, even works that were actually trans, shemale, or trap were mislabeled.- Algorithmic tagging:
Western adult sites later auto-imported these early tags. Since “futanari” got the most traffic, it became a catch-all for “female-presenting + penis,” regardless of anatomy or context.- Loss of context:
The subtle distinctions that Japanese fandom used (e.g., futanari vs. otoko no ko vs. nyotai-ka) didn’t translate well.
Western users tended to simplify them all under “futa” for convenience.
Why it’s a logical mess
You’re absolutely right that, logically:
- Trans characters (gender transition theme) ≠ futanari
- Traps / otoko no ko (feminine boys) ≠ futanari
- Shemale / dickgirl (Western porn terms) ≠ futanari
- True futanari (original) = biologically dual-sex (vagina + penis)
So, when “futa” becomes the umbrella for all of these, it erases precision — both for creators and for viewers trying to filter content.
Because futas with pussies look ugly and frankly a bit anatomically disgusting. It was only a thing outside of Japan for a short period of time when western artists were still copying japanese ones.I know for a fact that Bull drew a proper futanari with both sets once. I don't know if it was a request or someone held them at gunpoint for it, but they never did it again.
A woman with a vagain looks disgusting... but having big hairy balls is attractive to you?Because futas with pussies look ugly and frankly a bit anatomically disgusting. It was only a thing outside of Japan for a short period of time when western artists were still copying japanese ones.
Getting told nonsensical make-believe by randos really is what makes these forums so fun.Because futas with pussies look ugly and frankly a bit anatomically disgusting. It was only a thing outside of Japan for a short period of time when western artists were still copying japanese ones.
If you want a woman with a vagina just get a regular woman, problem solvedA woman with a vagain looks disgusting... but having big hairy balls is attractive to you?
Whever you are smoking fried your brain beyond repair.
If you want a woman with a vagina just get a regular woman, problem solved
People want futas with cock and balls, not with anatomically absurd pussies and ball-less cocks or something
>internal ballsYou knowledge of anatomy and biology is non-existent.
Balls on a futa would just get in the way. Their positioning is inconvenient and they block the view of the pussy, hence why them being intenal makes much more sense.
If there's a pussy and a cock, it's anatomically absurd, hope this helpsI have no idea what you mean with "anatomtically absurd pussies", you probably never saw a real pussy to begin with.
I don't know how is this relevant to the conversation, unless you're saying you like to see giant clits, which is kinda weirdIf you did and actually understand biology, you would know a clitan penis are the same, the only difference is scale and urinal canal. One of the reason clit is so sensitive is because it's basically the tip/glans of an undeveloped micro-penis.
No, I want to see girls with cocks, and if you have a cock, then you must have balls, else you look like an abomination. Your weirdly defensive stance about this makes me believe you're the one having doubts regarding your tastes... just saying. Never seen someone so scared of seeing a pair of balls. It's like you want a token pussy on them just to convince yourself of something. Which is fine, man, I just think it's kinda weird to call someone gay for wanting to see a girl with a cock fucking a woman. Is heterosexual sex gay now? You see, there's a pair of balls on the screen. That makes it gay.Yes, you want to suck cocks, gurgle balls and find vaginas disgusting - we get it, you're gay. You don't have to hammer it in
Wanting to see girls with sausage is weird in general, we all are weird by default for being here and waiting for any kind of progress. Welcome to the club.unless you're saying you like to see giant clits, which is kinda weird
Absurd to you, but you are ignorant and what you base your view on is wrong. You do not understand anatomy, you just use the word without any understanding of the human body, the underlying tissues, musculature, nor the biomechanics involved.If there's a pussy and a cock, it's anatomically absurd, hope this helps
If you do not see how this is relevant given the context of the discussion, then there's no point in discussing anything with you, if even such a simple concept is beyond your understanding.I don't know how is this relevant to the conversation, unless you're saying you like to see giant clits, which is kinda weird
"girl with cock"... It's not a girl if there is no vagina. And it's tto a futa either if there is no vagina - PER DEFINITION.No, I want to see girls with cocks, and if you have a cock, then you must have balls, else you look like an abomination. Your weirdly defensive stance about this makes me believe you're the one having doubts regarding your tastes... just saying. Never seen someone so scared of seeing a pair of balls. It's like you want a token pussy on them just to convince yourself of something. Which is fine, man, I just think it's kinda weird to call someone gay for wanting to see a girl with a cock fucking a woman. Is heterosexual sex gay now? You see, there's a pair of balls on the screen. That makes it gay.
Jeues christ dude you and LeakCode would get along with all the futa debates.Absurd to you, but you are ignorant and what you base your view on is wrong. You do not understand anatomy, you just use the word without any understanding of the human body, the underlying tissues, musculature, nor the biomechanics involved.
If you do not see how this is relevant given the context of the discussion, then there's no point in discussing anything with you, if even such a simple concept is beyond your understanding.
"girl with cock"... It's not a girl if there is no vagina. And it's tto a futa either if there is no vagina - PER DEFINITION.
What you are fapping to is a shemale/trans/dickgirl.
Pick your poison, it ain't a woman.
The one lying to themselves is you. You are attracted to the masculine, I'm attracted to the feminine. We are not the same.
I don't know why you brought me in. But females must carry eggs and give birth. That's how female is defined in biology, not just on humans but also plants.Jeues christ dude you and LeakCode would get along with all the futa debates.
As for anatomy, having balls covering vagina is actually the incorrect anatomy.Wanting to see girls with sausage is weird in general, we all are weird by default for being here and waiting for any kind of progress. Welcome to the club.
Whatever makes you comfortable, man.Pick your poison, it ain't a woman.
You are attracted to the masculine, I'm attracted to the feminine