Bask-0a
Member
- Nov 19, 2020
- 358
- 343
- 199
Good question, I too have been wondering the same thing.How does this compare to Soldiers life? Is it good?
Not that I remember perfectly, but there are a few small side vignettes when you visit other buildings that have a little bit of exhibition/public sex for random NPCs, but the main girls keep their debauchery very private.Good question, I too have been wondering the same thing.
I mean, I was always a fan of Pyorgara's work but looking at the list of tags on this one, it looks like a pretty vanilla game by comparison to Soldier's Life, Corrupting the Priestess (and to a lesser extent News Desk which started out great, like the others but ended on a rather vanilla note which was pretty disappointing after such great beginning/middle sections of the game).
The main question I have is: this seems to be the first of his games which is missing the exhibitionism tag, so does that mean this game really has no exhibitionism at all? (seems a rather lousy/vanilla turn for a dev who usually features exhibitionism heavily in his games) Or have the tags just not been updated since the initial release (which wouldn't be the first time lol)?
As I have not played this game yet and am not sure if I want to invest the hours needed for the grind unless it will be worth it, would really appreciate if anyone who's finished the game can confirm if Breaking the Princess is worth a playthrough for exhibitionism fans or not?
Damn, that's disappointing news, I wonder why Pyorgara decided to go that way with this one?Not that I remember perfectly, but there are a few small side vignettes when you visit other buildings that have a little bit of exhibition/public sex for random NPCs, but the main girls keep their debauchery very private.
I agree that this one seems pretty tame compared to their earlier work.
What?Damn, that's disappointing news, I wonder why Pyorgara decided to go that way with this one?![]()
Surly he must have known that he'd end up alienating half his fan base with such a drastic shift?
Lol I guess he was just looking for a quick/easy pay day but I'm sure he must have lost a lot of patreons in the process too.
Pretty sure the statement speaks for itself but if vanilla content is what you're into that's fine tooWhat?
Yeah, I get what you are saying, now in the context of a game mind you, I am going to say two thingPretty sure the statement speaks for itself but if vanilla content is what you're into that's fine too
And if you read my post properly you'd notice that I said half his fan base, so clearly you belong to the group who are in it for the sex, blowjobs and what have you (which is absolutely fine) but a lot of us couldn't really care less about those tags and would much rather see the protagonist female taking the journey from up tight private prude, to shameless exhibitionist proudly flaunting the goods for all to see (Best example of this in Pyorgara's games was the 'Train Wreck' ending in
'Soldier's life', now that scene was an example of exhibitionism at it's finest, man those were the days)![]()
After the visit, the game changes, and you get a new set of scenes to progress through, being able to assign the two ladies to different buildings every turn.I'd lose access to any sex scenes not unlocked
I'm still in the early game and there's a good amount of exhibitionism with Julianna. Assign to her the theatre and bathhouse and most of the scenes have some componentThe main question I have is: this seems to be the first of his games which is missing the exhibitionism tag, so does that mean this game really has no exhibitionism at all? (seems a rather lousy/vanilla turn for a dev who usually features exhibitionism heavily in his games) Or have the tags just not been updated since the initial release (which wouldn't be the first time lol)?
it's a 50% roll to capture after winning the clashI think the beastmasters aren't working properly. Every time they win a clash, it says the beastmaster had to kill the beast. Not sure what to do to capture any beasts. I've built extra pens but, so far, I have yet to capture anything.
yeah i did 2-3 full buildings and then just used someone's 100% save to view the scenes. the enjoyment from the gameplay was far over at that point having gone up to 4 mines and solving those fights.There's 4x working and 3x punishment for each task in each building, which alternate. It's by far the most tedious part, because, as you found, you can beat the game before doing much of any of it.
So the endgame is just plowing through turns getting 300 deeds per each of these dozens of scenes. I used the gallery unlocker eventually
i'm not sure when this opened up either. but i had a hell of a time buying them since they respect your population cap, which isn't indicated anywhere.Never did figure out how to unlock knights, since you can beat the game before needing them or mine 3/4
Had not seen it is indicated already as version 1, I am a supporter from two games ago, but did not manage to play for a long time, however, if it can help you feel better about it - after he finishes his games, he tends to make a "gold" version where he adds up something, also in terms of graphics, he has been doing it for the two previous games (still doing it for at least one of them), so, my guess is that he will do the same for this.It's too bad because the devs were fucking cooking with all the building scenes. Basically any kind of degradation/corruption you could want... there's stuff in there I've pretty much never seen in another game, like a knifeplay scene.
But the gameplay pacing breaks down and there's no art for any of them, welp lol
Isn't that part of the fun? Hmm, the key is here - Everything is fine as long as there is consent.Yeah, I get what you are saying, now in the context of a game mind you, I am going to say two thing
I have no trouble with exhibitionism, on the contrary. My problem is with "sharing" or making "public" the main cast, now I don't judge or care to have an opinion on the kick of other. Everything is fine as long as there is consent.
I tend to not like when, in order to break or humiliate, the mcs are "given" to subordinate or "ugly bastard" just to have them debased. That's just me, again.
Parading your "conquest" is fine by me, everyone having a go at them is not my thing.
Enjoy the content and show some appreciation for the dev.
Pretty vanilla. It's good, but not better compared to Soldier's life. The 'hardcore' humiliation/exhibitionism part is mostly absent here, only left with vanilla ones. (as per v1.00). I really enjoyed the Soldier's life game, it's unique. Probably only the art does not give the game justice for me, kinda a bit meh. (my opinion). Many assets look 'repeated', not sexy enough or kinda bland (compared to Akabur, similar type game). But the writing and the scenario are top-notch (especially the training development and the endings). Not many developers brave themselves into hardcore humiliation/exhibitionism play. Though, kinda lacking in graphic arts.How does this compare to Soldiers life? Is it good?