You must be registered to see the links
Got curious and gave this a read and yeah i have to agree with what's been said that it's at best extremely shady, that whole post really should have been summarized down to something like "i don't want to continue making or updating my mods and the discord server has a exhibition channel where minors have posted you can see here" but instead half the post is complaining about changes he wanted to the server not happening.
the BDCC server already had all the actual Discord-compliant barriers in place (including mandatory phone number verification, funny how he "forgot" to mention that)
Also he was a moderator, it's not a perfect solution obviously but if the discord compliant stuff is in place i don't think there's much else you can do. If someone admits they're a minor... ban them and problem solved??? nothing you set up will 100% keep minors out so that's why as a moderator it's your goal to wear epic freaking fedora and more importantly to this ban people who are minors but that post just makes me think he likes the control of being a moderator.
Most of the itch replies on the post are focused on minors getting into the server but wouldn't that more be a problem with bad moderation, making mentioning the server moderation being bad sound more like he's shooting himself in the foot to make a point? This isn't some moral gray area or unclear rule if they're admitting they're underage shove the moderator exclusive blue crayons up your nose and ban them.
Also I have no idea what's up with that last paragraph. What does "things change for the better" in this context mean beyond give me admin and i am trustworthy i promise role since that's the main point of the post. Most of the problems he has would be with other moderators and not the community itself.
