Can mods/staff decide if my content is allowed or not?

[morphnet]

You literally admit that they can be unfair and its their site/their rules and they can do whatever they want? You just prove my point though, I don't know if you realize or not

Take a deep breath, go for a walk, stop and think and if you still want to reply re-read what I wrote, because you are looking more and more foolish not just with your replies but also the fact you're ignoring more and more points!

It is also for other members who might read this so that they get the correct information and are shown the bigger picture and are not stuck just reading "I can't see it / I can't pay it so now I'm angry, mods and staff unfair"

 

[c3p0]

Missed this here, so make it myself:

 

[Count Morado]

deviant 150+follows 5k+ views, twitter 350+ followers with 60+ posts that each have 300-700 views for almost 3 months, I know creators that gets nuked day1 if their work is against TOS so idk, while its still possible that is true is very hard for me to believe, also rule34 posts need to be approved first by the mods I believe with new acc

150 follows on DeviantArt, 350 followers on Twitter are all plebian/neophyte numbers.

I know people who have gotten nuked in a day and I have known people who have gotten by for years

I've seen Tumblr accounts that have had questionable content since before that site's crack down in 2018 only to get nuked in 2024.

Same as what happens on Patreon.
Same as what happens on here.

That doesn't mean Jack shit.

 

[MyLewdForm]

sorry for double post




Hence my reply....


Are you for some reason under the impression that there is a human watching and reviewing every single post to "Twitter/Deviant/rule34"? Like here those places rely heavily on a reporting system, unlike here twitter has paid staff and a legal team and I don't know about deviant (staff and legal wise) and which rule34 are you even talking about?

It is also their site and "Twitter/Deviant/rule34" can do what they like, going "ooh everyone else is doing it so why not" was not an intelligent or realistic answer when people were 5 and it still isn't.



Every time you make a statement like this you loose more credibility and you didn't have much to start with.....



I don't know, it doesn't seem like you can but that's for you to answer.....

Well seems like you are only on defense and try to counter everything I say, instead of having a real conversation without any bias, and when there's a point u can't defend or where im right, you throw the wild card "Well its their site and they can do whatever they want with it and if you don't like it, leave" , very constructive conversation..

 

[anne O'nymous]

So you think he break or not rule7?

Whatever I would think, if ever I had thought about this, would be totally irrelevant.

Firstly because I'm not part of those who have to think about this.
Secondly because I'm not aware of what those who have to think about this have said about it.
Thirdly because it's a collegial decision, not something that come from a single person.

 

[MyLewdForm]

Whatever I would think, if ever I had thought about this, would be totally irrelevant.

Firstly because I'm not part of those who have to think about this.
Secondly because I'm not aware of what those who have to think about this have said about it.
Thirdly because it's a collegial decision, not something that come from a single person.

lol why everyone so evasive from simple questions lol, is not a decision, I'm just curious where you stand and if you can be honest or not but I think I already got my answer.

 

[morphnet]

Well seems like you are only on defense and try to counter everything I say, instead of having a real conversation without any bias, and when there's a point u can't defend or where im right, you throw the wild card "Well its their site and they can do whatever they want with it and if you don't like it, leave" , very constructive conversation..

Because it's a moot point, there is nothing to discuss, the rules are a fact, OP broke the rules and all you've offered is a very uneducated opinion that is not based in anything resembling common sense, logic or reality.

If you had bothered to bring up a single point based in reality there might have been a discussion, however your stubborn refusal to join the rest of us on planet earth makes it, as I said a moot point....

 

[c3p0]

As I'm already in it here, just some fact:

• You, MyLewdForm, is the only one that drive this thread on, all the other, including me, just react to your posts. The OP, TeenX3D, only wanted to know if his content is allowed or not and was suprised by the difference between the zone and other sites.
• Nobody cares, from a staff perspective about you or any other that are currently active here. You (and we) are only 1/7 994 070 of this board registered users. So your voice and ours would make only 0.00000125 of the total vote in a democratic process. As other already had written, this board is not a democratic place.
• If you want to a word in rule 7 question you would need to be staff. Best approach for that would be to first become moderator. Benefit of that would be that you see behind the curtains.
• And again no one from the staff cares about you (or me), this place have exist 4 years without you and most likely will do so without a problem after your gone (if you go). Our famous resident lesbian can vouche for that, Avaron1974.

 

[anne O'nymous]

Well seems like you are only on defense and try to counter everything I say, [...]

Stating facts and basic concepts that are expected to be common sense, this in answer to obvious lies and purely made up claims, is not defending something else that mind sanity.
And if it's, actually, countering everything you said, it's only because none of what you said so far came close to the reality.

instead of having a real conversation without any bias,

Who is biased exactly?

Is it those who point to facts, while linking to them for any readers to see by themselves?
Or is it the one who lies about the facts he present, taking good care to not actually leave any way to identify clearly the sources he used?

Be noted that lying and voluntarily truncating facts also do not point to a desire to have a "real conversation".

and when there's a point u can't defend or where im right, you throw the wild card "Well its their site and they can do whatever they want with it and if you don't like it, leave" , very constructive conversation..

Talking about points that can't be defended, I'm still waiting for your take on those points:

1. Radiant, as available here, do not have loli content, why did you claimed the opposite?
2. Neko Paradise do not have the "we reviewed this game" notice, why did you presented it as having it?
3. The girl you pretend to be prepubescent in Neko Paradise clearly have starts of, B cup or more, boobs visible in your screenshot, why did you claimed that it was a prepubescent character?
4. One of the character featured in your screenshots is more than probably a MtF transgender, why did you claimed that it was a prepubescent character?
5. What the fact that a game is in a "top list" for years have to do with the fact that no human being can possibly have the time to play all the games and updates?
6. Girls don't magically grow boobs the day they become pubescent, why did you believe the opposite?.

lol why everyone so evasive from simple questions lol, [...]

Well, only you know the answer to this question, since you are the one who's evasive and systematically discard any point that don't fit the narrative he want to push.

 

[MyLewdForm]

Yes still nobody state the obvious and dodge simple questions and only met with "If you don't like it just leave" or doomer stats, but I am the crazy one

 

[Ryahn]

• And again no one from the staff cares about you (or me), this place have exist 4 years without you and most likely will do so without a problem after your gone (if you go). Our famous resident lesbian can vouche for that, Avaron1974.

I care about you tho.....

 

[MyLewdForm]

The girl you pretend to be prepubescent in Neko Paradise clearly have starts of, B cup or more, boobs visible in your screenshot, why did you claimed that it was a prepubescent character?

So does teenx chars, yet you scream he break the rule7, and you guys still avoid Sunset Fairies and other game, and again thats just few examples I came in 5 minutes. You literally contradict urself and yet still nobody say the reason teenx chars break rule7 beside that staff decided that.

 

[Ryahn]

If you think site don't have to lose if they ban their top games, ur very wrong, thats literally ones of their most followed games and threads and a lot of people will be mad if they ban those games, I wont be surprised if they lose 20%+ of active members if they ban only the games I mentioned.

We could care less if the game has 20m views, 20k replies and the creator make 20k/m. We have banned games with high followings before and we will do it again.

Games that have been reviewed and approved by staff, can be reviewed again. This being new characters, content, etc. We have banned games in the past after a content update or not allowing games above or below a certain version. If the creator has too much content that breaks our rules, then the creator is banned all together and nothing is allowed.

Even if a game has been approved by staff, still report it. It could have been approved 1-5 years ago and things could have changed.

 

[MyLewdForm]

teenx chars have boobs > they are not prepubescent > not breaking site rule7 (rule 7 only do exceptions to prepubescent girls if they 2D or unrealistic but that doesn't apply to his chars coz they not prepubescent).

 

[Ryahn]

teenx chars have boobs > they are not prepubescent > not breaking site rule7 (rule 7 only do exceptions to prepubescent girls if they 2D or unrealistic but that doesn't apply to his chars coz they not prepubescent).

I don't know what you are not getting. If we deem it as rule 7 and needs to be reviewed or not allowed, then that is how it is. We don't care what you think about how we enforce it. We don't care if its unfair because how the rule is worded or how we enforce it. This is not a democracy.

 

[anne O'nymous]

yet you scream he break the rule7,

Please, be kind and show the world where I, Morphnet, or anyone other than OP himself, when quoting the answer he received, said that he broke the rule 1.7?

Or be smart enough and admit what anyone can see by himself since the thread is public and the posts do not disappear, therefore that no one did it...

and you guys still avoid [...]

I listed 6 points, I could have listed more. And among them, you quoted only one, yet it wasn't even to address it, but as introduction for one more of your purely made up claim. And we are supposed to be the ones who "avoid"...

 

[MyLewdForm]

We could care less if the game has 20m views, 20k replies and the creator make 20k/m. We have banned games with high followings before and we will do it again.

Games that have been reviewed and approved by staff, can be reviewed again. This being new characters, content, etc. We have banned games in the past after a content update or not allowing games above or below a certain version. If the creator has too much content that breaks our rules, then the creator is banned all together and nothing is allowed.

Even if a game has been approved by staff, still report it. It could have been approved 1-5 years ago and things could have changed.

Well for me is crazy that a game like Sunset Fairies is allowed but not teenx chars and that game always had the focus on lolis and had them from the start, they dont even have their chest developed and theres some chars with 7yo faces...Again I don't want this games to be banned, I just want everyone to be treated fairly, if you allow Sunset Fairies characters, you should allow older chars too? maybe? I dont know thats my only issue, is not the rules themself, is your site your rules, but I dont like when some people "special treatments" and it might be true that you guys dont care about how many views a game has, but you can't blame people when they say that either after you ban teenx chars and leave games like Sunset Fairies alone.

 

[Count Morado]

Yes still nobody state the obvious and dodge simple questions and only met with "If you don't like it just leave" or doomer stats, but I am the crazy one

The obvious is that this is their home, we are their guests, we follow their rules. If they wanted no one to have the letter M in their username, that is their choice. If we don't like it, WE FILE A SUPPORT TICKET, WE DONT BITCH INCESSANTLY IN A PUBLIC FACING THREAD. If they deny our request, we have two choices

1. accept it and stay or
2. don't accept it and leave.

We don't get a vote in the matter. It is not our home. It is not our party. We are the guests and we follow whatever rules are put in place. The end.

You can argue your viewpoint until you're blue in the face, you would still be wrong in doing so because this ain't your home. These ain't your rules.

As I posted in another boohoo rule 7 is bad thread:

First -
The decision to pull a game based on Rule 7 is not usually made by strictly one staff member. It is reviewed by multiple members of the staff and is decided by a majority opinion on the game. So your assertion that it is "power hungry mods" are deciding on their own holds no water. The standards are quite clear, if you take a moment and take a breath. For the vast majority of the decisions, the evidence is obvious. For the small few that may be on the borderline, that's why the staff uses multiple perspectives in their group to make the decision.

Second -
It's their site.
They make the rules.
They enforce the rules as they see fit.

If the content you seek is not on here, request it.
If the content you seek is not allowed on here, search elsewhere.

We visit this site by our choice.
We are able to post, share, download at their discretion.
If they do not like what we do, they can ban us.
If we do not like what they do, we can leave.

This isn't a difficult thing.
Arguing about whether a subjective discernment is "fair" or not, "right" or not, is not going to change this.
Life is not fair.
Sometimes that which a person thinks is right will not exist.

Third -
Arguing about this is like going into someone's home and arguing that the artwork they chose to hang on their walls was subjectively chosen and they made the wrong choices. Because, just like a person's home - this site is private property and the people who own/manage the home make the decisions on how the home is to be kept for the visitors who come in. If visitors do not like the decisions, they are welcome to leave. If visitors do not follow the decisions, they may be escorted out and told never to come back.

Fourth -
If a game is not allowed/removed - one may appeal the decision using a support ticket. If, following the appeal, the staff chooses to keep the game off the site, accept the decision and move on. If they choose to reverse the decision, accept the decision and move on.

In the end -
Arguing and questioning staff decisions in one of the open forums on this site is not going to persuade the staff to your position. It is more likely going to solidify their current decision because you are giving the appearance of trying to pressure them with hoping for greater numbers to take your side of the argument.

I dont like when

Then leave. There is the rest of the Internet, enjoy. So long. Fair well. Adios. Aloha.

Because those are the two choices you got - accept and stay OR leave. There is no in between.

I care about you tho.....

But what about me?

 

[Ryahn]

Well for me is crazy that a game like Sunset Fairies is allowed but not teenx chars and that game always had the focus on lolis and had them from the start, they dont even have their chest developed and theres some chars with 7yo faces...Again I don't want this games to be banned, I just want everyone to be treated fairly, if you allow Sunset Fairies characters, you should allow older chars too? maybe? I dont know thats my only issue, is not the rules themself, is your site your rules, but I dont like when some people "special treatments" and it might be true that you guys dont care about how many views a game has, but you can't blame people when they say that either after you ban teenx chars and leave games like Sunset Fairies alone.

its a recurring theme when we allow certain games and not others, etc. Its put up for a vote by all staff. If its deemed to break the rule, then it breaks the rule. Its why we do the vote and try to be as unbiased as possible. If we tie, we have further discussion and dig deeper into the game, etc and reach out the creator for more details.

 

[Ryahn]

But what about me?

Oh sorry didnt see you there