You had it me at girl in the first picture. Lets hope that Lesbian and Group Sex tag pushes through in future updates.
Dev said only one 18+ scene will be forced.not a big fan of forced sex scenes where we cant decide to bang or not to bang though.
just saw his patreon and that statement. so my fault for not going there before playing.Dev said only one 18+ scene will be forced.
I would like to address that. I really do agree sex scenes should be optional, which is why I made it a point that all future ones are.just saw his patreon and that statement. so my fault for not going there before playing.
still dont like the lack of choice but eh, shit happens.
for me its not enough to kill my interest in the game just because i know that if i had the choice i'd likely click yes anyway. plus from what i've seen of the girl i have no problems with her.I would like to address that. I really do agree sex scenes should be optional, which is why I made it a point that all future ones are.
As to why that scene isn't, is that it is integral to the plot. I thought about having an option to just fade to black and skip it, but in the end, I didn't like doing it that way.
I will consider it again for the next update. Thanks for the feedback.
Some people just love to harp on versioning and how everything should follow semantic versioning, which is borderline useless nowadays.soooo
you know how the dev labels his game/release versions ?
I wouldn't say it is kinetic, but for chapters 1-3, there won't be any significant branching. The choices in this VN are mostly for flavour, a little bit of RP, and some scenes will be exclusive to certain choices. I'm committed to making sure these flavour choices will be continuously reflected as the story progress. However, I'm not going to even attempt major branches this early in the story, it's going to hurt development than it is worth IMO.I like what I have seen so far. Is this going to be mostly kinetic, or will there be relevant decisions to be made?
It is by no means useless. Good versioning can allow you to roughly approximate the amount of content a game has. I know that a 0.1 doesn't have much content. I know that 0.6 means there have been a few months of work at least. I know that 0.14 means there's a lot of content but there's no ending. I know that 1.0 is more or less complete or has some completed aspects/storylines. Obviously you don't know how many hours you can put into a game just from that, but you can make a bet based on the versioning as long as it follows a general set of rules.Some people just love to harp on versioning and how everything should follow semantic versioning, which is borderline useless nowadays.
You're misunderstanding what I'm saying. I said. . .
I might as well explain how and why it is the way it is. This is Chapter 1, Part A, iteration 3. I'm doing it this way mostly for myself and people that (I hope) will be following this game. There's a fairly rigid system as to how much content there is for each update. Each release is like an episode of a TV series, I do this because I think this makes each update more worthwhile to play. Chapter 1 Part B for example, will wrap up the immediate plot introduced in Part A, and Chapter 2 will start a new arc. Should the arc requires more parts, then there would be a part c, etc.It is by no means useless. Good versioning can allow you to roughly approximate the amount of content a game has. I know that a 0.1 doesn't have much content. I know that 0.6 means there have been a few months of work at least. I know that 0.14 means there's a lot of content but there's no ending. I know that 1.0 is more or less complete or has some completed aspects/storylines. Obviously you don't know how many hours you can put into a game just from that, but you can make a bet based on the versioning as long as it follows a general set of rules.
In comparison to that, I have absolutely no clue what 1.A.3 means or what comes next, nor can I tell how much work has been put into the game without checking the changelog. I can only assume that this is the 3rd patch of the 1st Alpha, which isn't the most terrible versioning I suppose, but what's the 1 for? If A comes from Alpha, then do we have a second alpha (2.A.0) as well? Is there going to be a 1.B for beta? But wait, the changelog says this is the first version of the game. Why is there a 3 in the version? Shouldn't the first release be 1.A.0?
If everyone makes their own versioning rules then versions become virtually useless to anyone apart from the dev (and perhaps some fans/supporters which I suspect will grow tired if they have to keep in mind a different versioning for every single game they play).