HTML Completed Corpo Life [v0.19] [CorpoLife_dev]

[RebelliousKnightMordred]

Only the DF content why it's not made public
1. public DF content can get me into problem
2. It's not the main story, so you can still play the game without some kind of story blocker
3. Only few sex position that's not available
4. I spent thousands bucks buying the good faceset data
5. I spent days in training the model in the DFLab, and more days in rendering the videos
6. And most importantly, almost all my supporters agreed to this. They want me to make DF scenes, which at first I disagreed because the risk it has, but after some polls, and deep thinking I decided to make DF only for my subscribers (SM and VP gets it first, managers a bit later)
7. I use i9 and 4080 to render DF, it costs me a lot (in purchasing high quality face set + hardware). And I simply want a return on my investment
8. Majority of the contents and all cheats are available for free without any paywall isn't it?

You're gonna have more problems with charging for deepfake content. Whenever money is involved around likenesses and content that isn't your own there's grounds for cases. Like I said, it's fine to do whatever you want but don't expect people to be upset. You say no story content is walled and sure the story can be played but the content involving the character is walled. I just got to the Gal quest right now and one of the lines you put in the game is her saying "you can fuck me" but there's no indication that's locked off for supporters. So will you be able to see the penetration scenes as a free to play user at some point in the future? Or do we have to fork up $16?

 

[RebelliousKnightMordred]

Turns out it's not even just penetration scenes that have been blocked off. I keep getting a clip telling me to subscribe during a blowjob scene. So what you should've stated is that all the Gal content is locked to subscribers right.

 

[Gakko_dev]

You're gonna have more problems with charging for deepfake content. Whenever money is involved around likenesses and content that isn't your own there's grounds for cases. Like I said, it's fine to do whatever you want but don't expect people to be upset. You say no story content is walled and sure the story can be played but the content involving the character is walled. I just got to the Gal quest right now and one of the lines you put in the game is her saying "you can fuck me" but there's no indication that's locked off for supporters. So will you be able to see the penetration scenes as a free to play user at some point in the future? Or do we have to fork up $16?

You don't have to do Gal's storyline to progress the main story.

You have a point, adding paywalled content, doesn't matter whether it's only a small amount, will eventually got people mad. Then going down to the path of paywalling 50% or even more of my game's content sounds like a good idea. People gonna get upset and mad anyway, why stop only at 10-15%/minority of the content? I'm planning to add multiple marriages, and more pregnancy content for Eva, Gal, Reona, and many others.. It's an enermous work of code to be done. I thought I might share it for free, but now I changed my mind... but yeah people are already upset anyway with my DF videos that I made exclusively for my subscribers, so future pregnancy might go paywalled as well.

 

[Gakko_dev]

Turns out it's not even just penetration scenes that have been blocked off. I keep getting a clip telling me to subscribe during a blowjob scene. So what you should've stated is that all the Gal content is locked to subscribers right.

I might stop making Gal content for the future then. It's better that way I think, so people won't notice if such content exist anyway

 

[Gakko_dev]

If a triple A studio did the same thing it would rightfully be called out so why should it be different if the developer is independant?

No AAA games are free. You have to pay for even the base game, and pay additional money for extra content.

In my case, the base game is free, 300++ scenes, all cheats available, only 5 scenes are paywalled. If you think that it's a bad practice, it's your opinion and you're entitled to it. I respect it, but I don't have to listen to it

 

[RebelliousKnightMordred]

I might stop making Gal content for the future then. It's better that way I think, so people won't notice if such content exist anyway

The problem is that it's so blatantly walled off. Argue that AAA games aren't free all you want I've already explained it's not about the price tag or the size of the studio it's the bad practices employed by them and by small devs like you now. If you want to remove the content fine but it seems like you have. I noticed when I first started this update that I couldn't visit Gal and do the repeatable scene that was available before. Then I find out new content with her has been locked behind a paywall, I could've even forgiven this because the phrasing was "new penetration scenes are for vp and senior tiers" or whatever you call them. But then I get to that new content and during the "blowjob" scene to introduce that plot point all I see is a 4 second clip telling me to subscribe and give you money. So all we get to see as public players is some groping and then an advert. Finally once that scene was over Gal just no longer exists in the game. Can't even visit her house. So in reality content has been cut for us.

 

[RebelliousKnightMordred]

You don't have to do Gal's storyline to progress the main story.

You have a point, adding paywalled content, doesn't matter whether it's only a small amount, will eventually got people mad. Then going down to the path of paywalling 50% or even more of my game's content sounds like a good idea. People gonna get upset and mad anyway, why stop only at 10-15%/minority of the content? I'm planning to add multiple marriages, and more pregnancy content for Eva, Gal, Reona, and many others.. It's an enermous work of code to be done. I thought I might share it for free, but now I changed my mind... but yeah people are already upset anyway with my DF videos that I made exclusively for my subscribers, so future pregnancy might go paywalled as well.

If you want to piss and whine about it go ahead bro, I don't care. I'm not mad at you nor do I really care. I'm pointing out bad practices. Like I've said multiple times. You're free to do whatever. You can't please everybody, only a fool tries to accomplish that. The problem isn't content that's exclusive for subscribers, the problem is when that content is "included" in the free version but instead of actually being included what we get is an advert telling us to subscribe and then a character that was once in the game just gone.

 

[taler]

Nobody is disputing that it's fine to charge for games. It's locking the content in the game behind the paywall that people have an issue with. Like I said, be serious. I hate wasting my words going in circles with idiots. I said it's completely fine if that's the path the dev wants to go down but expect pushback. No one had a problem with delayed releases so subscribers had some benefits. The issue comes when they release a public build that has content locked off for subscribers that relates to that update.

All regular game are locked behind a paywall bro, you've just developed an entitlement for free games by being on a PIRACY FORUM. Don't try to take the moral high-ground, we're all stealing here.

 

[Alex964]

When and under what conditions can I buy a mansion?

 

[kokotheworm]

I'm not declining that. Like you said he can do whatever. It's the consumers prerogative to speak out against practices they don't like. If a triple A studio did the same thing it would rightfully be called out so why should it be different if the developer is independant? Bad practice is still bad practice.

A consumers pay for the thing he consume. Fairness goes both way.

 

[Lerd0]

 

[jerome292]

Am I the only one not being able to progress the transformation office? Whatever i do the progression bar is stuck at 0.

 

[RebelliousKnightMordred]

All regular game are locked behind a paywall bro, you've just developed an entitlement for free games by being on a PIRACY FORUM. Don't try to take the moral high-ground, we're all stealing here.

I don't know how many times I'll have to explain or dumb down my statement to make it make sense or if in fact you're not really interested in understanding the statement and instead want to fling your own righteousness around. If I'm trying to take the moral high ground here then what are you doing by trying to argue against me and championing the dev? You're right it is a piracy forum, so do you not understand then why people would be put off when things uploaded to a piracy forum need you to in fact pay for content. This is the last I'll say on the matter though, you're only right about one thing and that there should be no morality when it comes to piracy so I hope you remember that mantra when it comes down to it lil bro.

 

[RebelliousKnightMordred]

A consumers pay for the thing he consume. Fairness goes both way.

A consumer is whoever interacts with the product regardless of how it is obtained. The dev themself uploaded the content so they can't even claim it's being taken from their subscribers and posted for free like I've seen in countless other threads. What it comes down to is that this site originally was only for pirated games, then we had a boom of people becoming devs and making their own games for the sake of appealing to audiences, after that these devs started patreons and so on and so forth until we finally got to the point where games are being released at version 0.0001 and the devs put in links to patreon and hidden content for subscribers. That's not what corpo dev is doing, nor am I accusing them of such. Like I said, they're free to do whatever but they can't complain if they share their product on a site dedicated to piracy and people push back against the notion of payment for content. I even said I wouldn't have cared but my problem is that the content that is supposedly subscriber only is in the game and if you interact with it all you get is an ad.

 

[taler]

I don't know how many times I'll have to explain or dumb down my statement to make it make sense or if in fact you're not really interested in understanding the statement and instead want to fling your own righteousness around. If I'm trying to take the moral high ground here then what are you doing by trying to argue against me and championing the dev? You're right it is a piracy forum, so do you not understand then why people would be put off when things uploaded to a piracy forum need you to in fact pay for content. This is the last I'll say on the matter though, you're only right about one thing and that there should be no morality when it comes to piracy so I hope you remember that mantra when it comes down to it lil bro.

You're the one whining and wasting everyone's time with your inane bs. Just stop, you're annoying.

 

[RebelliousKnightMordred]

You're the one whining and wasting everyone's time with your inane bs. Just stop, you're annoying.

Again, how am I wasting anybody's time. These are my own thoughts on a public forum. It's not my fault you have nothing better to do than wait for a reply from me like a neglected son so you can feel better by arguing. If you're annoyed or find my bs inane then stop reading it and play the game you love so dearly. Or do you need permission?

 

[Haxaur]

Is Gal Scenes Pay Walled?

 

[Gakko_dev]

Is Gal Scenes Pay Walled?

Yes, some acts/positions are paywalled. But you can ignore Gal's story completely

 

[RebelliousKnightMordred]

Yes, some acts/positions are paywalled. But you can ignore Gal's story completely

Please be honest. The part you added for the public version isn't available. You said yourself that penetration was the only scenes not included but when you get to the blowjob we get ads for your patreon and subscribestar. So in reality all we see is some groping.

 

[Haxaur]

Yes, some acts/positions are paywalled. But you can ignore Gal's story completely

Sooooo, the gal vacation scenes on the sexvid folder is redundant?