Updated wrong information*. I think there's a difference between the situation you mentioned and the one I was talking about. You were talking information on the wiki being outdated because some things got reworked and the editors haven't had the time to change that entry yet (they at least are aware of that needing an update, there's some kind of control). I was talking about people updating entries with wrong information which is a bigger issue since you need to have someone constantly keeping track of what people are changing on the wiki, checking if what they added is accurate or if something suddenly got deleted.
I don't think it's weird that they want to have a way to supervise what goes in and out of the wiki, and the easiest way to do that is keeping it private. I don't really get why it bothers you so much.
Nope, same thing. It's still wrong information and again, the DR changes were made in update 0.2.30... back in
You must be registered to see the links
So I laugh when you tell me they haven't had time to update it. Not only have they not updated the wiki, they haven't even updated the ingame codex.
I've administrated and fixed several wikis. It's not hard to manage one and no you don't need someone to CONSTANTLY keep track, as there are often also users willing to amend mistakes. It is apparent you have zero experience in this. It's frustrating when you see an easy fix for code/grammatical/misinformation but yet you and 99.9% of their users are inconvenienced to fix it. HENCE, why there are so few editors and why it's very out-of-date, if that wasn't already the most damning piece of evidence against making it private. It's absurd they'd make it private when they obviously have ZERO desire to update it themselves.
To drive this point home, <1% of the wiki is written by the staff. The majority of edits within the last year are made by one user for CoC2, and this is their profile:
And this is just a random user. He is not part of the staff, but he is responsible for most of the recent wiki. Is he the one who administrates it or makes it private? No, so it's senseless that the Fen staff holds and restricts it AT ALL when they'd be better off passing the wiki to someone who actually gives a shit enough to administrate it. Also, no, I doubt they are aware considering the person who put up those "outdated information" tags is...
The fact you're willing to defend it leads me to believe you're blowing the entire Fen team as you typed that. The only reason they made the wiki was for mere ownership. They do not maintain nor update it, much less supervise it at all. You opened your mouth without knowing anything and now are an utter fool. Good day.
