Others Corruption of Champions II [v0.8.4] [Savin/Salamander Studios]

2.90 star(s) 128 Votes
Discussion Reviews (128)
Z

Zytoxx

Newbie
Jan 8, 2019
62
108
MisterNephilim said:
After playing TiTS this game just feels "wrong". I can't put it into words.

Also not having Lamia tfs is lam(ia)e.
Click to expand...
I'm genuinely kinda curious about the general opinion on CoC2 atm, I've just read some the reviews like one of the recent ones being a long ass rant about the kitsune content :D and stuff which seems to mainly boil down to less choice, power fantasy variety and MC status influencing the story as it should than before? In the very least, the review score seems to have dipped a bit since I last checked ^^

For reference, I played like 2-3 years ago I think when the centaur village + Kitsune village was relatively new, only got to the part where I freed my fox waifu and did some of the early quests until I reached a content block with the kitsune village, but I can't say I recall it being particularly bad or anything when I personally experienced it compared to that long kitsune rant review.

I only remember it being a waste that you didn't have the option to add the daughter to your harem if you eventually wanted to for corruptions sake but other than that I liked it as it was then, so I'm quite curious as to how the game feels now when I've stacked so so many updates for it compared to when I last played.
(I'm doin the same thing with TiTs as I really enjoyed that game when I first tried it a few monthes ago so I'm curious about how CoC2's been.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: armyman654, Kai D Grim, YouShallNotLol and 2 others
GokutheG

GokutheG

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2022
1,563
3,051
MisterNephilim said:
After playing TiTS this game just feels "wrong". I can't put it into words.

Also not having Lamia tfs is lam(ia)e.
Click to expand...
The biggest problem seems that TiTS is more about player freedom to create the character they want vs CoC2's more limited character options and the dev's seeming position that the player's character shouldn't feel important to the story.
Like in TiTS my character is a slime/dragon hybrid and I'm able to adjust her basically anyway I want vs in CoC where I liked the manticore tail because it was interesting but that option was removed due to no one writing many scenes for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: armyman654, MissedThatPart, Kai D Grim and 6 others
C

Cloudrunner

Newbie
May 13, 2020
43
132
As someone who likes straight furry content and doesn't like futas, neither game has enough content for me to justify supporting either of them. Generally, for my own tastes, it's not worth running a male character as there's maybe 1 or 2 female NPCs that aren't futas and also have at bare minimum animal ears, though full furry is preferred. It tends to be more worthwhile to just make a female character, transform her to my liking, and then get myself fucked by whatever weird creatures the game has to offer. And to that end... I find CoC2 has more consistently better monster loss encounters than TiTS. Though again, that comes with a grain of salt since I don't like futas, so that leaves either straight up monsters like tentacle beasts, or dominant male encounters which are few and far between.

At the very least I can usually find something to like after every few CoC2 updates. But with TiTS I usually have to wait out months and months of grotesquely shaped futa monsters before they release any palatable content.
 
MisterNephilim

MisterNephilim

Active Member
Jan 1, 2019
939
2,127
GokutheG said:
The biggest problem seems that TiTS is more about player freedom to create the character they want vs CoC2's more limited character options and the dev's seeming position that the player's character shouldn't feel important to the story.
Like in TiTS my character is a slime/dragon hybrid and I'm able to adjust her basically anyway I want vs in CoC where I liked the manticore tail because it was interesting but that option was removed due to no one writing many scenes for it.
Click to expand...
Yeah this seems to be it, like in TiTS I have an Amazonian naga plant/dryad zaika hybrid and there is a lot of reactivity to my choices, but CoC 2 feels "bare".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kallisto, QuedzaDrake and GokutheG
benisfug

benisfug

Member
Aug 18, 2018
323
929
GokutheG said:
The biggest problem seems that TiTS is more about player freedom to create the character they want vs CoC2's more limited character options and the dev's seeming position that the player's character shouldn't feel important to the story.
Like in TiTS my character is a slime/dragon hybrid and I'm able to adjust her basically anyway I want vs in CoC where I liked the manticore tail because it was interesting but that option was removed due to no one writing many scenes for it.
Click to expand...
The biggest problem is that the CoC2 writers just want to write their own stories about their own ocs but they've decided to shoehorn those things into CoC2 for marketing reasons. So you get to make your own character and roleplay to a degree but then you get to Suxxdix69's 500,000,000 word epic about his ocs who are totally irrelevant to the rest of the game and suddenly your character either becomes a quiet third wheel or turns into Suxxdix69's self insert regardless of how you played up to that point.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking Face
Reactions: nowayman69, MoneyMan181, armyman654 and 25 others
M

muschi26

Engaged Member
Jun 22, 2019
3,160
4,937
M0nte said:
No, at least I hope so. The drawing just seems unfinished.
Click to expand...
I’m really curious, because there are a bunch of things that look weird to me.
  • The rightmost minotaur’s face looks more like a dog snout than a cow’s muzzle. The fingers of his right hand look like they’re splitting into two at the tips.
  • The centre minotaur’s right hand looks like a birdclaw. There’s something off about how his shoulders and pectorals fit together.
  • The leftmost minotaur’s hand is melting into his face.
  • There are weird double-vision effects and transparencies, like the drinking-horn on the table(or at least that’s what I assume it’s supposed to be; it looks almost like a scroll), the head of the background minotaur on the left. On the bottom left of the table, you can see what appears to be a hallway with a door. The top of the image has a fold, as though this were footage from an old VCR cassette.
  • The background marble statues (are they supposed to be more minotaurs? If they’re supposed to be placeholders or pose studies, they’re very detailed) are completely wrong, with their pecs in particular being lopsided and having multiple lobes.
  • The level of detail is confusing. The rightmost minotaur at the table has detailed arm air on his left arm, when his left hand is still just a blob. Surely, if this were just a rushed piece, the artist would’ve spent less time on the background minotaurs in favour of finishing the hands on this guy, right?
  • The table doesn’t even have legs and just fades into existence. The minotaurs aren’t sitting on chairs, and no outline of a chair even exists.
Edit: typos.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thinking Face
Reactions: FictitiouslySane, YouShallNotLol and M0nte
W

Wrynn13

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2018
1,016
3,696
muschi26 said:
I’m really curious, because there are a bunch of things that look weird to me.
  • The rightmost minotaur’s face looks more like a dog snout than a cow’s muzzle. The fingers of his right hand look like they’re splitting into two at the tips.
  • The centre minotaur’s right hand looks like a birdclaw. There’s something off about how his shoulders and pectorals fit together.
  • The leftmost minotaur’s hand is melting into his face.
  • There are weird double-vision effects and transparencies, like the drinking-horn on the table(or at least that’s what I assume it’s supposed to be; it looks almost like a scroll), the head of the background minotaur on the left. On the bottom left of the table, you can see what appears to be a hallway with a door. The top of the image has a fold, as though this were footage from an old VCR cassette.
  • The background marble statues (are they supposed to be more minotaurs? If they’re supposed to be placeholders or pose studies, they’re very detailed) are completely wrong, with their pecs in particular being lopsided and having multiple lobes.
  • The level of detail is confusing. The rightmost minotaur at the table has detailed arm air on hid left arm, when his left hand is still just a blob. Surely, if this were just a rushed piece, the artist would’ve spent less time on the background minotaurs in favour of finish the hands on this guy, right?
  • The table doesn’t even have legs and just fades into existence. The minotaurs aren’t sitting on chairs, and no outline of a chair even exists.
Click to expand...
So it's an allegory for the whole game then? I wonder if that was on purpose.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Runufiv, DragonWood and YouShallNotLol
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
2.90 star(s) 128 Votes