Nevart
Newbie
- May 4, 2020
- 29
- 129
- 203
This is from the changelog: By popular demand, you can now combine special world seeds by using them within a longer seed — for example, you can use “velvetroperizzler” to combine both of these seeds, or use them both while generating different NPCs with a seed like “velvetroperizzler2” — though wacky combinations may produce wacky resultsCan you have multiple secret seeds?
It's a time-waste in an already time shredding game for people that are not interested in it. Saying it's just part of the life simulation sounds rather... resigned. Like it couldn't or shouldn't be any different. You are able to block several other fetishes/kinks from coming up at all, so why not this as well? Because it is just that: A needlessly time-consuming task/fetish that keeps you, however briefly (though it adds up), from the things you actually want to do and enjoy. But I guess I should be thankful that we don't have to brush our teeth too, right?I get that not everybody can like every game but some criticism seems strange. The bladder need is an integral part of the life simulation. After some expansions in Sims, you can eliminate that need, but it's still and integral part in that you need a special perk in order to no longer need to pee. Perhaps something similar will be implemented in CoT, but there are not even hints that Anthaum wants to do away with in.
As for there being no hints that Anthaum wants to do anything like that... Well, obviously, if no one speaks up about it...
The circumcision slider was specifically brought up in the context of it being chosen over several other more suitable/enjoyable customization options. There, fixed it for you.In that context, complaining about a circumcision slider being added instead of Anthaum working on "obvious defects" like a need to pee is just strange. One thing is a content issue for which people have different priorities, another is a gameplay element that isn't slated to be changed at all.
As for them both being mentioned in the same post: You're right, they are both completely different elements of the game... which doesn't make it wrong or even strange to mention them both in a post that's mainly about criticism.
In earlier versions of the game it was a real problem, believe it or not. It sometimes took far too long to learn the actual genders of the NPCs you elected to court, resulting in some rather frustrating surprises. So I will admit there is probably some left-over frustration from that time.For me personally, I don't mind not being able to set one gender to zero, but I can see how some players might find that annoying. Yet that too doesn't seem like something the dev has any intention to change. So there's nothing wrong with complaining about it, yet it likely won't do anything. Also, how annoying can that be? Is it really that bad if you can't sex like 5% of the population?
As for right now: It's like an itch you can't scratch. It just doesn't feel right. In other games you better make your zero actually be a zero, or else. But not here, no. You will just have to accept that you will have to ignore 5% percent of the population because...? Not like that is actually possible, because you will inevitably interact with them at some point. It's not about sexing them, it's about just being able to play with who and what you want, and only that. Which should be normal. But if you really need a real reason for the clean zero, then you only need to look to the future. Merely as far as the major update that will allow NPCs to enter and leave relationships, for example. And suddenly those 5% are a great deal more annoying than they already are.
You are resigned about a lot of things, aren't you? Here is a question for you: Would you like some visual aid or not? It would be nice to have right? Forget for a moment about it not being essential to the game and just speak your mind. Maybe about some other things you would like to see too.I don't care about the many hairstyles and clothes styles. And same as Nevart, I have to google some of them to even know what they are. But this is something that's super important for a subset of players that want to play pretty dress up with their characters. And I suspect it's relatively easy content to implement. So I'm just resigned to the fact that this will always be part of the game development, and stick to the clothes and hairstyles that I know.
This I genuinely didn't know, so thank you.As for the specific complaints about not being able to customize NPCs in certain ways, this is what Anthaum wrote in a recent dev diary:
" Another item that did well is expanded NPC customization. If you like customizing NPCs, you've probably noticed there are certain things you just can't change, like their pubic hair, tattoos, piercings, and so on. So I'll be working on adding all the options that don't currently exist for them. Technically this item is in third place, but it's pretty close to second and it's one of the smaller items on the list, so it's very likely I'll make sure it gets done this month. "
So things are moving in the direction you want, Nevart.