CREATE YOUR AI CUM SLUT ON CANDY.AI TRY FOR FREE
x
4.80 star(s) 5 Votes
Nov 21, 2023
66
74
The most useless and boring daval project

* Where is the other fat dude (it's been hours to this bullshit and the most likely excuse daval will give that he is sleeping

* It's nothing but sex after sex with each other for hours nonstop and quite boring ( how tf they are able to do this much , it's completely unrealistic)

* Ngl SN has lost all my respect for it (I just hope it ends)
 

crazydaddy420

New Member
Sep 9, 2024
14
12
Your opinion borders on being irrelevant. People often forget that writers don’t work on empty stomachs. First and foremost, they must prioritize the audience that supports them financially. While external opinions may hold some value and no writer wants to alienate potential followers, it is unlikely they will jeopardize their paying audience just to appease someone who has never contributed to their livelihood.

On the topic of redundancy, there is actually a logical framework here. The idea that "if his subscribers don’t think it’s boring, it’s not boring" is rooted in the fact that subscribers are paying for the content. If they found it boring, they simply wouldn’t pay. What you may not consider to be "entertainment of the highest order" can very well be just that for those who choose to pay for his creations. The comparison to Netflix is entirely flawed. Netflix is able to provide such value for its subscription due to the multitude of revenue streams and massive scale it operates on. Meanwhile, a game developer might spend years creating a game that a player can finish in two hours yet charge a similar price. Does that make one inherently worse than the other? Not at all. It simply reflects the different industries, creative processes, and value propositions involved.

Moreover, the idea that all entertainment should deliver the same value for money as Netflix is inherently flawed. Entertainment is subjective—what entertains one person might not entertain another. Therefore, whose opinion holds more "worth"? Clearly, it's the one from the person who financially supports the content. Their subscription is a direct vote of confidence in the entertainment value they receive.

Therefore, the act of subscribing inherently validates that they find the content engaging or worthwhile. In this sense, opinions from non-subscribers who claim it is boring hold less weight, as they are not the ones supporting the creator. It isn’t that non-subscribers’ opinions are dismissed as projection arbitrarily; rather, those opinions don’t reflect the actual value exchange taking place between creator and paying audience, so while not being worthless, they're worthless-adjacent.

As for novelty, while seeking it excessively might lead to a loss of authenticity or consistency, it doesn’t mean subscribers always demand innovation. People subscribe to creators like Daval3D for a mix of familiarity, consistency, quality, and even connection to the creator, not necessarily for constant reinvention. In sum, as one user said before:




In short, the argument that subscribers determine whether content is boring holds merit because their continued support proves they find value in it. Meanwhile, non-subscribers’ opinions lack the same significance in this context because they do not reflect the audience keeping the creator afloat. People have been relying on the same methods for years, whether it’s in writing hentai, making movies (many of which feel like they’ve been rehashed countless times), creating TV shows, or producing pop music that follows the same four chords repeatedly. It’s a formula that persists across industries. If something works, there’s no reason to change it; doing so might only alienate an audience that values the consistency and predictability of the content they came for in the first place.
So many many words but the additional value is null. See, this is why reading comprehension is so necessary in real world. You're complete lack of awarnes of the intention behind my reply makes your word filled reply totally pointless and invalid. When I said, we the people who are not his subscribers are not happy with the way the plot of ID or SN is going. It doesn't mean I want daval to change it for me I want daval to better it for his subscribers who pay top dollar even if I don't get to see it. There's a lot of creator like jab, hentai creators and Y3DF who would use their side characters in 3-4 pages to do some erotic stuff or use the same characters in almost getting caught situation very cleverly. Daval could've done that. It's just that, my opinion, it's not a wishful thinking nor does it translate to oh daval must do that rather to he should've or could've done more on those pages to provide more value, since his subscribers pay so much. And the Netflix comparison was not to compare but to reiterate the commitment his subscribers has shown him for which he should be grateful and use every pixel of every page he renders to provide more eroticism to his subscribers. You, instead of comprehending properly went on a tangent. Is everything alright?
 
Last edited:
May 8, 2024
46
52
So many many words but the additional value is null. See, this is why reading comprehension is so necessary in real world. You're complete lack of awarnes of the intention behind my reply makes your word filled reply totally pointless and invalid. When I said, we the people who are not his subscribers are not happy with the way the plot of ID or SN is going. It doesn't mean I want daval to change it for me I want daval to better it for his subscribers who pay top dollar even if I don't get to see it. There's a lot of creator like jab, hentai creators and Y3DF who would use their side characters in 3-4 pages to do some erotic stuff or use the same characters in almost getting caught situation very cleverly. Daval could've done that. It's just that, my opinion, it's not a wishful thinking nor does it translate to oh daval must do that rather to he should've or could've done more on those pages to provide more value, since his subscribers pay so much. And the Netflix comparison was not to compare but to reiterate the commitment his subscribers has shown him for which he should be grateful and use every pixel of every page he renders to provide more eroticism to his subscribers. You, instead of comprehending properly went on a tangent. Is everything alright?
Everything I’ve written has value; you just refuse to acknowledge it; a pattern I’ve noticed with you.

YOU SAID:

this is why reading comprehension is so necessary
Irony?

YOU SAID:

It doesn't mean I want daval to change it for me
Of everything I’ve written to address this, I’ll leave you with this:

If something works, there’s no reason to change it; doing so might only alienate an audience that values the consistency and predictability of the content they came for in the first place.
Plus, what the other user I quoted had said previously.

YOU SAID:

I want daval to better it for his subscribers who pay top dollar even if I don't get to see it.
Once more, reading comprehension is so necessary:

What you may not consider to be "entertainment of the highest order" can very well be just that for those who choose to pay for his creations.
YOU SAID:

should've or could've done more on those pages to provide more value, since his subscribers pay so much
I SAID:

Therefore, the act of subscribing inherently validates that they find the content engaging or worthwhile.

Take a moment to reflect on your own advice. You're just angry, and it seems like frustration is clouding your perspective and affecting your reading comprehension. Every point you've raised has already been addressed. Stop making it seem like this is about others—it’s blatantly obvious about you. Please stop trying to frame it as something else; that’s not how constructive dialogue or democracy works. You’re essentially telling people they’re having fun wrong, which isn’t helpful. Take a deep breath, step back, and let it go.

Wishing you a happy and peaceful holiday season.
 
4.80 star(s) 5 Votes