- Nov 11, 2021
- 1,357
- 3,061
No thank youLiam fucking Amanda and Alexa is great, but those women need to fuck other guys too
Hopefully, he fell and fractured both his orbital bones, rendering him permanently blind. In his attempt to recover to his feet, he steps on a small stone rupturing his Achilles tendon. Just as he is crawling toward the room where Liam, Amanda, and Alexa are having sex, a "Good Year" blimp flies over the cabins dropping the sum of three million dollars. A flash mob then appears, but the small gnome is too inconspicuous, so the crowd stomps him to death. The crowd leaves, and after Liam has pleasured both his mother and aunt completely, he steps outside and notices the money. He's able to recover $750,000. The End.* Where is the other fat dude (it's been hours to this bullshit and the most likely excuse daval will give that he is sleeping
I think when the fat dude arrive at room Liam , alexa and amanda will surely hide behind the lamp or maybe flower pot , and have sex for hours in front of him , then the fat dude will take out $750,000 from his bag or something that he got before arriving to this hotel and will left the money on the table and leave or maybe sleep on the bedHopefully, he fell and fractured both his orbital bones, rendering him permanently blind. In his attempt to recover to his feet, he steps on a small stone rupturing his Achilles tendon. Just as he is crawling toward the room where Liam, Amanda, and Alexa are having sex, a "Good Year" blimp flies over the cabins dropping the sum of three million dollars. A flash mob then appears, but the small gnome is too inconspicuous, so the crowd stomps him to death. The crowd leaves, and after Liam has pleasured both his mother and aunt completely, he steps outside and notices the money. He's able to recover $750,000. The End.
Ok so give us next another essay of why you think that's not really the issue hereTo whom it may concern, enjoy your Yule, Xmas, Saturnalia, Natalis Sol Invicti/Sol Invictus, Winter Solstice, etc.
On to the subject at hand,
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You didn't have to read (hence my putting the "essay" in spoilers.) And I think it's pretty obvious what I'm suggesting. But if it wasn't made clear, I'm suggesting that your remedies aren't fresh or innovative. They've been executed in various other works as I so carefully listed. The only difference between the redundancy or repetition in that content, and the repetition in the content of Immoral Desires, is that you are either okay with or prefer the redundancy of the former rather than the latter. That's it. And if you've been reading this kind of content long enough, I'm fairly confident in my assumption that you have most likely seen everything there's to see. That is to say, if most of this stuff is repetitive anyway regardless of one's kink, then I have a hard time believing that repetition is reason for one's boredom.Ok so give us next another essay of why you think that's not really the issue here![]()
You are wrong I read that essay because I fucking wanted to so I legit asked you because I'm interested even if is obviousYou didn't have to read (hence my putting the "essay" in spoilers.) And I think it's pretty obvious what I'm suggesting. But if it wasn't made clear, I'm suggesting that your remedies aren't fresh or innovative. They've been executed in various other works as I so carefully listed. The only difference between the redundancy or repetition in that content, and the repetition in the content of Immoral Desires, is that you are either okay with or prefer the redundancy of the former rather than the latter. That's it. And if you've been reading this kind of content long enough, I'm fairly confident in my assumption that you have most likely seen everything there's to see. That is to say, if most of this stuff is repetitive anyway regardless of one's kink, then I have a hard time believing that repetition is reason for one's boredom.
What exactly am I wrong about?You are wrong, I legit asked you because I'm interested even if is obvious![]()
Not "accurate." And I didn't suggest that it was "new." The only thing I've insinuated is that it's less "repeated," which appears to be the measure for your boredom.So are you telling us Daval "remedy" for ID and SN is accurate lol that's not fresh or innovative just look at the examples you pointed out in your first essay Tal3sofDebauchery's Mother's Shame and Mandologica's Breaking Boundaries for example are like that , that category is small yes but still nothing new![]()
I said you are wrong because you thought I was making fun of your essay explaining your pov, that wasn't the case at all.What exactly am I wrong about?
The notion that your remedies are neither innovative nor fresh? I think I've made a convincing case.
That you possibly prefer or tolerate the redundancy seen in multiple pairings as opposed to single pairings? Well, you know yourself better than anyone, so if my statement was too presumptuous, then I retract it.
Or that you've likely seen everything there is to see? Again, if I was too presumptuous, consider it retracted. In that case, try out some of the titles I've mentioned.
Not "accurate." And I didn't suggest that it was "new." The only thing I've insinuated is that it's less "repeated," which appears to be the measure for your boredom.
Okay.I said you are wrong because you thought I was making fun of your essay explaining your pov.
I'm aware of its meaning. Are you under the impression that I'm stating Immoral Desires is innovative? Several posts back, I stated this:The key word you mentioned is innovative: of a product, idea, etc. featuring new methods; advanced and original, so basically new.
Why would I state that and then turn around and argue that it's "new" or "original"? I stated that for content especially of this length, single pairings or virtually single pairings are "rare." And that if repetition is your standard for boredom, then Immoral Desires should be the least boring with respect to that metric.Why is Immoral Desires so popular? Lana has a gorgeous design; Daniel has a decent design with an aggressive and commanding approach; and the mother-son genre invokes subconscious Oedipal fantasies within the predominantly male audience. Do you believe Immoral Desires was the first to broach this subject?
Or he could actually end it and start something new with characters we haven't seen before instead of dragging out these stories even moreI said you are wrong because you thought I was making fun of your essay explaining your pov, that wasn't the case at all.
Oh yeah you were presumptuous af
The key word you mentioned is innovative: of a product, idea, etc. featuring new methods; advanced and original, so basically new.
"But if it wasn't made clear, I'm suggesting that your remedies aren't fresh or innovative".
You are confused I never said my suggestions were new, I said that just watching Lana and Daniel was boring and also how about using the secondary characters way more with their independent sex scenes that's nothing new either I just want variety in the comic adding different interesting plots (nothing new either).
Now you aware that those 2 words are basically synonymsOkay.
I'm aware of its meaning. Are you under the impression that I'm stating Immoral Desires is innovative? Several posts back, I stated this:
Why would I state that and then turn around and argue that it's "new" or "original"? I stated that for content especially of this length, single pairings or virtually single pairings are "rare." And that if repetition is your standard for boredom, then Immoral Desires should be the least boring with respect to that metric.
I think he's going to continue to drag things and wasting characters as usual.Or he could actually end it and start something new with characters we haven't seen before instead of dragging out these stories even more
That's the issue with inventing narratives as one goes along. Now it just seems as though Daval is hard-pressed for "new" ideas, and may be attempting to bide his time until he can "figure it out" or the popularity of Immoral Desires dwindles. I don't think he wants to let go of this series because it has to be, and I'm assuming, a large source of income for him. And with that, I'm suddenly reminded of the line from the 2008 film, "The Dark Knight," i.e., "you either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain." So it makes me wonder, will any of these comics have a "good ending," even if they don't extend as long as the author wants, or will they persist long enough and go the CrazyDad route and pretty much alienate all but one fringe audience? In all honesty, I wouldn't be surprised if it results in the latter.Or he could actually end it and start something new with characters we haven't seen before instead of dragging out these stories even more
So what are you saying?Now you aware that those 2 words are basically synonyms
Now you are assuming things , the difference here is I never said you said ID was something new in the first place.
You know damn well what I referring to , don't tell me you forgot our little chat already.So what are you saying?
And let me propose that we continue this discussion through start a conversation as the moderators are cracking down harder on subjects that derail the thread.