4.30 star(s) 7 Votes

Mekalam

Member
Jun 28, 2024
160
349
149
Uncle Peter and Sarah are blood related. If I remember correctly, Uncle Peter is Sarah's father's older brother. And it's because of this blood relation that I can even tolerate, or admittedly like, Uncle Peter and Sarah's pairing. (As I've said before, I've always liked the Uncle-Niece pairing in incest.) If Uncle Peter was just some random dude, or let's say, Luke's uncle instead, I would've stopped reading MT at the beginning of Chapter 4.
I mean first degre blood related..mother father sister and brother..
 
  • Like
Reactions: SansaStark

Mekalam

Member
Jun 28, 2024
160
349
149
Just say you love creepy old men banging young women or goldigger type of stories more. And almost no one will support your theory that Daniel is more evil than peter. And as I already mentioned Daniel is a teen to just post teenage boy/man while peter is an old creep. Their ages makes their personal choices that much more impactful upon the readers.
If you still don't wanna agree, then I guess my first impression about you is 100% correct. Hahaha.
I like whole story of TO.. from david sarah peter sarah and now aron sarah..so you are wrong
 

Travaruz

Member
Mar 30, 2024
286
915
179
I like whole story of TO.. from david sarah peter sarah and now aron sarah..so you are wrong
Agreed TO is quite enjoyable with its unpredictability unlike other monotone stories, heavy agree that Daniel is quite evil himself just like Pete he is really rapey and forces and manipulates his way to get what he wants, the age factor the other guy brought up is also pretty irrelevant, guess his mindset is that it’s more acceptable to be young rapist rather than an old one.
 
Last edited:

_OBLIVION_

Engaged Member
Oct 3, 2021
2,069
6,191
636
Agreed TO is quite enjoyable with it’s unpredictability unlike other monotone stories, heavy agree that Daniel is quite evil himself just like Pete he is really rapey and forces and manipulates his way to get what he wants, the age factor the other guy brought up is also pretty irrelevant, guess his mindset is that it’s more acceptable to be young rapist rather than an old one.
Is hilarious to me how many white knights Daniel has , they can't fathom even the slightest criticism.

The age gap is so true and relevant to them too old Uncle Peter bad but young Daniel good wtf that's so hypocritical, it looks like they don't pay attention even in the sex scenes :KEK: :LUL::FacePalm:
 
Last edited:

8TB

Member
Dec 24, 2023
444
2,954
320
I mean first degre blood related..mother father sister and brother..
I don't dispute this. But think of this way: if Sarah's father and Uncle Peter are first-degree blood related, then that means that the same dominant genes Sarah inherited from her father are also in Uncle Peter since the siblings are both male. She may not be as related to her uncle as she is to a sibling, but they're not that far off. She's more related to her uncle Peter than she is to her cousins, the daughters who Uncle Peter mentioned. And she's, if only slightly, more related to her uncle, Peter, than she is to David because David inherited his dominant genes from his own father, who as far as we know, isn't related to Sarah. (I think that's part of the reason I like Sarah and David's pairing the least of the three.)

But help me understand Mekalam, because I've seen this more than once, and perhaps my perception is different because I spent most of my childhood and adolescence in the states. Does incest outside of the immediate family make it "less" incestuous? I know cousin incest is more acceptable and less taboo than other forms of incest because it present a viable means to reproduce. Maybe it's me, because I grew up around my cousins, aunts, and uncles, that I tend to see members both of my immediate and extended family as... family.

With all that in my mind, I would agree that Daniel's actions thus far have probably been more egregious than Peter's. Uncle Peter, for as much of an A-hole he is, doesn't resort to narcotics or induced inebriation to get his way. And if we're really being honest, I don't think Uncle Peter force Sarah into sex. It was Sarah who assumed that Uncle Peter's knowledge of her affair with David meant that he would tell Luke. But if I remember the dialog correctly, Uncle Peter never once threatens to tell Luke. He played around with the idea of exposing her affair in Chapter 5, but it was more so his manipulating her to expose herself... which is pretty crappy thing to do.

It's a dilemma: Daniel is more charismatic and likeable, but his actions are probably more egregious; and Uncle Peter is so unlikable, but his actions are less egregious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MEFANBOY

8TB

Member
Dec 24, 2023
444
2,954
320
Agreed TO is quite enjoyable with it’s unpredictability unlike other monotone stories, heavy agree that Daniel is quite evil himself just like Pete he is really rapey and forces and manipulates his way to get what he wants, the age factor the other guy brought up is also pretty irrelevant, guess his mindset is that it’s more acceptable to be young rapist rather than an old one.
Neither Daniel nor Peter raped anyone. And why is it that when expressing your favor for one of the comics, it has to be at the expense of another? Immoral Desires is my favorite, but I don't qualify that with statements such as "unlike other stories where the women have sex with all the men in their house, or women who almost get raped, or motorboat and play footsie with a stranger's penis, or feature in pinups getting gangbanged by a number of black men and loan-sharks." It's clear that each of these three comics have a thematic identity: Immoral Desires is a comic featuring a virtually monogamous incestuous pairing, V.I.P. Madness: Together features an incest free for all, although it's more like Sarah's harem, and Satisfying Needs for the most part features Liam's incestuous harem with some "extracurricular" activities.

And I don't mean this just for you, Travaruz, but all those who've incessantly complained about Immoral Desires in some revisionist delusion that these complaints are going to somehow make Immoral Desires less popular, or the least featured comic on Daval's site. Or do you guys just resent that a character with Lana's insanely attractive design isn't used in the fetishes you'd like to see play out? And therefore you're going to constantly trash the theme you believe is keeping Lana from being the "goddess" acting out your preferred perversions? Not everyone is going to have a positive opinion, that much I understand. But when the same complaints get repeated over and over, then none of you are really in position to argue "monotony" without contradiction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moan Buster

Dami28

Member
Mar 28, 2025
252
955
112
I agree neither Daniel nor Peter raped anyone, Daniel never raped Lanna, rough sex yes, insensitive manipulator, too but I have doubts if Daniel is really in love with Lanna or just Lust although he express he is in love with her. But on the other hand he is a teenager so his love towards her might be logically immature (although there is a thin line between strong love and obsession). What I see evil is his attitude towards his father, althouth he is seen by Daniel as an obstacle he drugged him twice without any remorse because of his sexual urges of course he won't kill his father, but It is unrealistic Daniel pretends avoid Alex from having sex with Lana for ever, at some point It woudl result in more aggressive behavior of Daniel towards his father, or Alex discover what is happening under his roof. At the end is an incest comic but how Daniel's Character is showed, he could do ti ha ha. That's evil. What I would like to see It's at least some more action of Rose, Sharon, Sophia or Martha, and I am not implying orgies that change the nature of the comic which is the relationship of Lana and Daniel.
Wath makes me noise is that It is not very credible that nobody (even Alex) do not see something changed in the dynamic of relationship between Lana and Daniel. How many chapters of sneaky sex between them fooling the others does have Daval in mind?. To be clear It is an opinion in this forum, I am no criticizing the suscribers or who likes how it is written i respect all opinions.
 
Last edited:

Travaruz

Member
Mar 30, 2024
286
915
179
Neither Daniel nor Peter raped anyone. And why is it that when expressing your favor for one of the comics, it has to be at the expense of another? Immoral Desires is my favorite, but I don't qualify that with statements such as "unlike other stories where the women have sex with all the men in their house, or women who almost get raped, or motorboat and play footsie with a stranger's penis, or feature in pinups getting gangbanged by a number of black men and loan-sharks." It's clear that each of these three comics have a thematic identity: Immoral Desires is a comic featuring a virtually monogamous incestuous pairing, V.I.P. Madness: Together features an incest free for all, although it's more like Sarah's harem, and Satisfying Needs for the most part features Liam's incestuous harem with some "extracurricular" activities.

And I don't mean this just for you, Travaruz, but all those who've incessantly complained about Immoral Desires in some revisionist delusion that these complaints are going to somehow make Immoral Desires less popular, or the least featured comic on Daval's site. Or do you guys just resent that a character with Lana's insanely attractive design isn't used in the fetishes you'd like to see play out? And therefore you're going to constantly trash the theme you believe is keeping Lana from being the "goddess" acting out your preferred perversions? Not everyone is going to have a positive opinion, that much I understand. But when the same complaints get repeated over and over, then none of you are really in position to argue "monotony" without contradiction.
Don’t get me wrong ID is good and has its charm however there are times where the story just feels like it’s kinda stuck or the same thing happens each chapter which is Daniel tries Lana to confess her feelings while having risky sex so they don’t get caught. Compare that to TO where it’s aunt with nephew then gets taken advantage of Uncle while Aaron is sleep raping Alice, Aaron then sees Sarah sleep raping David and his disgust turns into sexual urge, Alice gets raped by random woman on toilet and ultimately catches the two of them and now we have Aaron fucking Sarah and hopefully sometime soon Alice with David. And no i don’t resent that Lana isn’t “shared“ because she is insanely attractive, as a matter of a fact i prefer Sarah cuz she looks more feminine. Also both Daniel and Pete are rapists, both women kept saying no and didn’t ultimately wanted it, they even begged them to stop but they didn’t and the women had to accept it. It’s not an issue since it’s just comics but yeah that’s rape, dude.
 

MrD812

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2021
1,710
2,670
330
Almost every male character if you really think about it
Have not vested enough interest to see them all.
Barn size butts, titanic tits, what i call little boys (shota), rude asinine mindset composition, can only tolerate so much.
Least for my self as well of some others, gets redundant just trying to get through the storyline.
 

Moan Buster

Newbie
Apr 26, 2025
83
441
72
Neither Daniel nor Peter raped anyone. And why is it that when expressing your favor for one of the comics, it has to be at the expense of another? Immoral Desires is my favorite, but I don't qualify that with statements such as "unlike other stories where the women have sex with all the men in their house, or women who almost get raped, or motorboat and play footsie with a stranger's penis, or feature in pinups getting gangbanged by a number of black men and loan-sharks." It's clear that each of these three comics have a thematic identity: Immoral Desires is a comic featuring a virtually monogamous incestuous pairing, V.I.P. Madness: Together features an incest free for all, although it's more like Sarah's harem, and Satisfying Needs for the most part features Liam's incestuous harem with some "extracurricular" activities.

And I don't mean this just for you, Travaruz, but all those who've incessantly complained about Immoral Desires in some revisionist delusion that these complaints are going to somehow make Immoral Desires less popular, or the least featured comic on Daval's site. Or do you guys just resent that a character with Lana's insanely attractive design isn't used in the fetishes you'd like to see play out? And therefore you're going to constantly trash the theme you believe is keeping Lana from being the "goddess" acting out your preferred perversions? Not everyone is going to have a positive opinion, that much I understand. But when the same complaints get repeated over and over, then none of you are really in position to argue "monotony" without contradiction.
Agree. I think it's useless to argue with people the main job is live in the forums entire day.
 

Mekalam

Member
Jun 28, 2024
160
349
149
Does incest outside of the immediate family make it "less" incestuous? I know cousin incest is more acceptable and less taboo than other forms of incest because it present a viable means to reproduce. Maybe it's me, because I grew up around my cousins, aunts, and uncles, that I tend to see members both of my immediate and extended family as... family.
In my country marriage between cousins absolute not incest..even the religious consider it even good fortune and says god recommend to do this..but you know cause medical problem for babies..
 

Borel

Member
Jan 7, 2022
218
193
53
Just checked Daval3D out and am disappointed. The art is good but the stories are typical incel shit: Beautiful highly-sexed, weak-willed, accessible and sex-starved mom gets corrupted and turned into an orgasm addict, by cunning manipulative son, who uses her as a sex toy wherever, whenever and however he pleases from that point on. In real life I really love and respect girls and women and so hate the misogyny and abusiveness inherent in Daval3d's work. Jesus! This site is already swimming with sick incel shit like this. You can keep it. Surely someone, somewhere, must be trying something new? I haven't given up looking yet but I know what I'm looking for isn't here that's for sure.
 
Last edited:

MEFANBOY

Newbie
Jul 12, 2024
80
241
111
Just checked Daval3D out and am disappointed. The art is good but the stories are typical incel shit: Beautiful highly-sexed, weak-willed, accessible and sex-starved mom gets corrupted and turned into an orgasm addict, by cunning manipulative son, who uses her as a sex toy wherever, whenever and however he pleases from that point on. In real life I really love and respect girls and women and so hate the misogyny and abusiveness inherent in Daval3d's work. Jesus! This site is already swimming with sick incel shit like this. You can keep it. Surely someone, somewhere, must be trying something new? I haven't given up looking yet but I know what I'm looking for isn't here that's for sure.
It's still better than all the shit crazydad or pigking does.
 

Luka__mindo

Member
Apr 20, 2020
343
1,218
267
Haha! I don't think there's much to worry about. Taking one's coffee "black" is an actual expression; I would assume the "blacker" part is a result of the language barrier, and Daniel simply means no "additives" like cream or milk.



Because ultimately, Daniel isn't coercing Lana. His drugging Alex is nothing new, as he notes himself when recalling the events of Chapter 6. Daniel's aggressive, but he loves Lana. Uncle Peter, on the other hand, is a consequence of poor writing. When first introduced, he's presented as a doting, flattering, yet slightly mischievous and manipulative uncle. However, since Daval proceeded with his inclusion despite the protests of his subscribers, he mutated Uncle Peter's personality to that which would assure the fan base that there'd be no possible extended relationship between Sarah and her uncle. In other words, Daval turned Uncle Peter from someone who was constantly complimenting Sarah (something Sarah even notes had been going on since she lived with him in her youth) to someone who berates her and coerces her into sex--although, whether Uncle Peter "coerces" Sarah is up for debate. And if I remember correctly, in Chapter 6 of MT, Uncle Peter tells Aaron something to the effect of "all women are bitches..." in the hopes of having Aaron not dwell on what he witnessed, but instead seize opportunities to have sex with them when they arise. (And thus imply that Uncle Peter thinks of his own niece as nothing more than a bitch.) And now, even in his own comic, Peter is still an A-hole, of the highest order, the reasons for which are entirely unnecessary.

Uncle Peter's unlikable because Daval made him that way, and it's easier to target him because his appearance suggests creepy, ugly, old pervert. Daniel on the other hand has a decent appearance for a young male his age, and comes off more as "brazen" than "A-hole."
actually it is way simpler Daniel is young person who has sexual desire for elder but as well sexy and beautiful woman , on the other hand we have old and ugly person who wants to have sex with younger and more beautiful woman and that is main reason why me and probably others cant stand Peter , but are okay with Daniels behaviour. I have seen video experiments where people were offered to practice Rescue breath on young and old person both male and females refused to do it with older person but did it without many thoughts with younger and more attractive person even thought they bot where strangers.
 
  • Heart
Reactions: MEFANBOY
4.30 star(s) 7 Votes