3D-Daz Daz3d Art - Show Us Your DazSkill

[44Tom]

Picture A was rendered in 5mins and denoised. You can tell when you zoom in that image A has lost some quality compared to Picture B (it's blurrier and has lost some details). Without zooming in, however, you are correct in that they are almost identical and certainly acceptable for posting here.

I think that Night Hacker has made his point. Picture A was NOT denoised. The title of the picture was "Wanda_at_the_Beach_-_45m.png". So, it took 45 min. to render. Picture B title was "Wanda_at_the_Beach_-5m.png". My assumption was that Picture B WAS denoised, thus took 5 minutes to render, and picture A, NOT denoised and took 45 min. to render.

 

[RobertDeadth]

A morning stretch From the second episode of Tune in to the show

 

[Mybi87]

 

[atheran]

This time, I didn't even bother trying to upload the 4k.
Also, I might want to stay away from DoF blur during render. Takes forever and a half and I'm not convinced it's as good as Nik's collection's filters that are lightning fast while still trying to emulate a proper camera/lens combo.




But I DO need to find a better skin/freckles combination. I really don't like how the skin looks here and the freckles? That's just like someone spray painted them on her.

 

[DocKlunk]

 

[Kevin468]

another version
View attachment 1686857

V3 FINAL VERSION MAYBE

 

[ntrvip]

New picture of Scarlett of our game OnlyFuck2

View attachment 1688856

Delicious meal

 

[Balkazzaar]

View attachment 1689246

May I know what 3d assets were used in this scene?

Pretty please and thank you.

 

[DitaVonTease]

This time, I didn't even bother trying to upload the 4k.
Also, I might want to stay away from DoF blur during render. Takes forever and a half and I'm not convinced it's as good as Nik's collection's filters that are lightning fast while still trying to emulate a proper camera/lens combo.


View attachment 1690135

But I DO need to find a better skin/freckles combination. I really don't like how the skin looks here and the freckles? That's just like someone spray painted them on her.

A really cute character, & nice to see slim natural girls, here. Have you tried

• Ultimate Freckles for Genesis 8 and 3 Females and Males by philw

 

[Deleted member 34473]

 

[rasikamehra051]

Th

I've got a better rig coming next month and plan on expanding my learning curve, there's a lot of assets you'd need, It's quite a long list. What I do is look at Daz3d vendors like Zeddicus for morphs, glute utilities is a must and body diversity allows you to add shape that don't increase or decrease breasts allowing you to mould them to your taste. I love the skins on Vicey3d's figures from renderosity and some of them also have body shapes I like to work with that enhance areas like the glutes etc. with some realistic results. Deviantart has free morphs from people like Magnus1781, TritiumCG and more. Tenen71 has some free full characters including skin and some which include hair. I'm still learning myself, I know what I like and can pull shapes that please my eye, I just can't incorporate scenes and more than one character on this absolutely tin pot laptop.

Thank you my friend for giving me a direction with so many asset reference. I would definitely play around with these assets and morphs and hopefully will come up with my own dream character

Thanks and would love to see more from you !!

 

[rasikamehra051]

View attachment 1689030

I've become your big fan. Just absolutely love your amazing nude arts where you play with age of the characters

 

[rasikamehra051]

View attachment 1689171

Wow! Wow! Wow! Wow!

Just my type of art. Please keep that coming

 

[naughtynafz]

 

[DoctorPervic]

Are you looking at my butt?

 

[Night Hacker]

So, it's the last time I bother you with this ugly hag, final version, 4k, no postwork. I think she's a hot MILF.

View attachment 1689759

Ugly hag? No way. You done a nice job on her. She looks more mature without looking unattractive. Nice work on the hair colour as well.

 

[Night Hacker]

I may be old and half blind, but I'm not seeing a difference.

Tell that to the others in here. I just posted clear evidence backing up what I said, and they still argue against it. Whatever. My advice is aimed at those of us who do not have deep wallets and are stuck with a low end card and FHD 1080P rendering. I just posted the proof and they ignore it.

What else can I say? I posted my own honest tests with an HDRI background (as one of them suggested, my tests uses an HDRI background) and the proof is in them.

I'm not saying everyone should use it, if you have the hardware and t he time to wait, by all means, avoid denoising, you probably get fast renders anyhow, but for the rest of us, denoising is a fast alternative which produces some really nice results, really fast and for me, as seen in my example I posted, I see NO DIFFERENCE. Period.

Also notice I wasn't attacking anyone in MY POSTS, I originally posted in order to help someone who was having slow render times and MY post was attacked by the anti-denoising zealots in here. I didn't attack anyone, I tried to help, but I may not bother to help anyone again in here if this is what I get for my efforts.

 

[Night Hacker]

Are you looking at my butt?

View attachment 1690449

Very nice! I think the lighting in this really helps.

 

[InfamousRebel]

Th


Thank you my friend for giving me a direction with so many asset reference. I would definitely play around with these assets and morphs and hopefully will come up with my own dream character

Thanks and would love to see more from you !!

Happy to help. This laptop is so temperamental that results vary and I bin off so many half rendered images and give it a rest for days. Can't wait to get the new rig.

 

[Fotsirk]

I think that Night Hacker has made his point. Picture A was NOT denoised. The title of the picture was "Wanda_at_the_Beach_-_45m.png". So, it took 45 min. to render. Picture B title was "Wanda_at_the_Beach_-5m.png". My assumption was that Picture B WAS denoised, thus took 5 minutes to render, and picture A, NOT denoised and took 45 min. to render.

Haha fair enough! I didn't even think to look at the picture names. That's odd though, when I zoomed in on Pic A it was blurry. Hmm maybe the denoiser adds sharpening? I don't quite understand how denoising works exactly, so idk if that's standard or not.