That is a very different - and valid - line of argument than what was presented. My point wasn't arguing against that at all. It was arguing against people who think otherwise from you, as shown by what they actually said.
That said, I've basically said what I need to say on that topic, and had already moved on. Anything further will just get more morons making stupid comments about it being "off-topic" (Stupid because they only tagged me because of the length of my post, as shown by how they didn't bother anyone else involved in the topic. Lengthy response or no, it's all off topic if any of it is, so they can all fuck off with their selective nonsense. Especially since it was actually on topic because what was disucssed was how the content of this game is different from others, and was congratulating it for being such!) and others who somehow feel big and bad by giving stupid little messages about "paragraph poems" because they can't just scroll past a post that wasn't talking to them anyway.
I've no time for weak minded imbeciles who are intimidated (hence the unreasonable anger they expressed) by a post that actually backs up it's assertions rather than making tiny tweet length posts. You at least made a valid point, hence my response to you. Congratulations on not being an immature fool, I guess? For making a response that actually has some sense to it rather than filled with low self-esteem as revealed by the need to try and insult a person for speaking "long" like that was some sort of issue? Why these people feel like their remarks actually do anything is something I'll never understand... it's the internet. So what? And they don't even know what or who they're talking to - I'm a military special forces vet. They really think their little "owns" are going to... what? Make me shut up if I'm not finished? Because some little wanna be on the internet thinks he's intimidating, but would never do anything in person because they're a little pussy? Lol, sure. No, I'll finish, when I've finished.
But that's enough about them. Basically, just letting you know I've finished what I had to say, and that what you had to say while valid wasn't what I was arguing against at all. It's one thing to not want the girls involved to love the others more than the MC. It's another to not want them to touch the others, only the MC. Those aren't the same situations at all. The posts I argued against didn't want yuri period, and said nothing about emotions, only about sex.
Tl;Dr: Your point is one that I understand - such emotional issues could cause the harem to break up entirely - so that's a whole different issue. One my argument was not addressing, because that wasn't the argument being made by those I responded to. Now if you have something valid to the arguemnt that was actually presented (yuri in harems being bad and/or not belonging to the genre) then I might have more to say, depending on the argument presented and if it actually requires more than what I already said to counter it. But it doesn't look like that's your actual stance and thus I don't actually expect that. So... have a good day, I guess.
