- Aug 9, 2016
- 915
- 1,461
Fair enough. For what it's worth, the whole codex entries thing is -as with other entries- a world-building thing, hence the consistency. Zeta is sexually liberated, you have people fucking on the streets and even a temple for this. You can't have those with a sexually repressed society. And with that casual sex worldview, sharing is a byproduct.Both, actually. The first one is not a deal-breaker if the content is truly very "well-separated", which includes how the dialogue is handled. But I would say that it does lessen the experience, because you may be losing a substantial amount of content, or you could also use the "immersion issues" argument (which also has to do with how the dialogue, and the scenarios, are handled).
It is true that some people dislike the game even if this type of content is said to be avoidable, but you're talking to someone who invested hundreds of dollars in a game (not this one) that had tons of (optional) straight-up NTR content (including netotare), just to give you an idea.
And I have seen it happen, more than once (I can't give examples here because of the cross-promotion rule), which is not as far-fetched as you put it, it's that the game may lose the balance between the two types of content, a lot of time this optional content gets bigger and bigger, maybe because of patrons, maybe because the dev feels like it. It may not be premeditated, but it happens.
I mean, if you are refusing to even make this statement that sharing will never be the priority, or that sharing will be reduced to X amount of content per update, this does raise my eyebrows. Plus the dialogue changes for "consistency", and the addition of that journal entry for the same reason... are also off-putting to me, in a game that started looking like a harem when I played for the first time.
We didn't create the lore to justify sharing, we included sharing because it makes sense in that world.
As for me refusing to make such a statement, there are multiple reasons for this.
1. I am not the main creator, and while I do have input in the game, it's his story (whether you presume sharing is a large part in said story or not is besides the point).
2. The way we approach scenes and the kinks included in them is "does it fit the story and the scene? Does it blend well?". If yes, we try to include it. And that goes for any kink, not only sharing in particular.
That means, while we don't intend for sharing to have any pivotal role in the game, I can't outright exclude that some update among the many might have more of it over the course of the game.
Will it happen? No idea. Will it not happen? Equally no idea.
So, I'm not gonna say that it will appear up to X% in any given update and then we have to scrap a scene because "we promised".
Most updates had 0 of it, others more. It's how it is.
3. Personally, I absolutely loathe the notion that every thread has to have a "No NTR" sign on the front page with big neon letters to avoid "but what if the developer decides to do it????!". It doesn't happen for any other kink and I find it silly as fuck. So I won't be doing anything that propagates this.
I know the above doesn't do much to calm your concerns, nor was my intention to do so. I just wanted to provide a honest view on how we approach making this game.
We've made sure that any and all kinks are completely avoidable for people that do not like it, but that's the extent we'll go.
We are not going to make a statement about the MC not going around pissing on everyone's face in the future in case people not in watersports fear it might happen for some reason, and this here is pretty much equivalent.