No, the problem was that "the thing I fatfingered once" set off a redirect block by the adblocker, something I have not triggered for a LONG time.
You have opened a link, opening which was blocked by a blocker. Basically just accidentally clicked an ad.
It is, to put it lightly, not a big deal. More like not a deal at all.
You cannot "remove bad buttons from existence entirely" on specific browser/extension combos
Well it is a shit combo then, is it not? Use another one. And Lite version is called Lite for a reason.
One - they could have replied with a "you cannot", you know, the first sentence in the post is a direct no-vagueness question AND they had three months to do so; and two - unwarranted toxicity much?
It doesn't matter how much time you have when the entire thing should be dismissed in the first place.
And don't pretend like a "no-vagueness" question was not gonna be followed by a "why" question. Which you actually did anyways, after even not getting an answer for the initial one, hilarious.
Toxicity - sure, unwarranted - I would argue not.
* You ask a not-so-smart question (again, to put it extremely lightly, which is why everyone ignores it).
* Then you press, reiterate and insist on asking that question for 3 months, so it's not a one-time occurance.
* And finally you insinuate something to be "suspicious", like implying that the staff is trying to scam you.
To me it looks like a three strikes situation.
"make sure the convo has more than one person talking"
Well, you sure as hell got me talking, hope you're satisfied.
No additional conditions on how the talking goes will be accepted though.
The behavior itself is suspicious,
I told you man, it's a conspiracy. Those damn Illuminati want you to goon to AI.
