anon12345678p

Newbie
Dec 26, 2021
96
128
ok… that is hilarious…. Next he’s going to put out a new game called catalyst. I'm starting to understand the hate on this guy now.

As far as the AI argument goes… I get both sides. I have seen AI generated stuff that at least looked original to me. At the surface, if the art and story was good I would care less. I think someone who used AI could be creative and original, but they have to have the creative inspirations and AI needs to be used solely as a tool and not the main source of inspiration. Unfortunately, it is getting to a point where AI is now the main source of inspiration. Logistically, I understand how AI is considered plagiarism. AI is created by history. It only knows what has been done before. However, does that mean that AI will never have the ability to create new styles?
Simply put most AI art just looks bad. Especially when it's of porn. I'm fine with AI for backgrounds and landscapes, works perfect for that. But for characters and replicating an art style in a way that looks nice, it can't.
 
Apr 6, 2022
132
138
ok… that is hilarious…. Next he’s going to put out a new game called catalyst. I'm starting to understand the hate on this guy now.

As far as the AI argument goes… I get both sides. I have seen AI generated stuff that at least looked original to me. At the surface, if the art and story was good I would care less. I think someone who used AI could be creative and original, but they have to have the creative inspirations and AI needs to be used solely as a tool and not the main source of inspiration. Unfortunately, it is getting to a point where AI is now the main source of inspiration. Logistically, I understand how AI is considered plagiarism. AI is created by history. It only knows what has been done before. However, does that mean that AI will never have the ability to create new styles?
Considering AI is exactly that; artificial, my opinion is it can only be so "creative" from the prompt received and the art it gets trained on. All of that being human creation. It wouldn't be AI that was "creative" per se, moreso the people it draws from. AI is a conduit for creativity, not a source. Again, only my opinion.
 
3.40 star(s) 53 Votes