Febui
Active Member
- May 6, 2022
- 604
- 762
I'm sure it will never be greatly optimized, but the optimization is improving in the next update so it shouldn't run worse than it already does, even with the additional features.
Unity Dungeon: Keep Her [v0.18 Alpha] [keepherdev]
- Thread starter keepherdev
- Start date
How do we get the game to run instead of starting to a empty corner of a stone wall and several overlapping menus that do nothing?
why every time my character cums he says he hates the girl he is having sex with?
Febui
Active Member
- May 6, 2022
- 604
- 762
Anyone know if:
1) There is a way to prevent Servants from getting stuck? Seems to happen on occasion when moving stockpiles or baths.
2) If there is a hard cap on the amount of Traits a single character can have? Sword Master, Fertile, etc.
3) If there will be buildings to "farm" Petals for Alchemy or Crystals for Exp?
1) There is a way to prevent Servants from getting stuck? Seems to happen on occasion when moving stockpiles or baths.
2) If there is a hard cap on the amount of Traits a single character can have? Sword Master, Fertile, etc.
3) If there will be buildings to "farm" Petals for Alchemy or Crystals for Exp?
LDV
Member
- Jan 23, 2018
- 235
- 263
the same thing is happening to me
i lurked the post and it seems we have to cap the game to 60
i had it at 240 and then tried 30 just in case LMAO, 60 is the spot
Last edited:
keepherdev
Newbie
- Sep 8, 2022
- 53
- 455
Hey everyone!
Featuring the new Dungeon Court, a customizable player area you can visit in third-person and play around with your characters in! All room assets have been reworked, alongside new rooms, clothing, items, genes and a lot more!
You must be registered to see the links
Featuring the new Dungeon Court, a customizable player area you can visit in third-person and play around with your characters in! All room assets have been reworked, alongside new rooms, clothing, items, genes and a lot more!
MilesKiyaAnny
Well-Known Member
- Jan 18, 2019
- 1,650
- 502
losergf
New Member
- Mar 6, 2022
- 3
- 24
Okay, I do like the idea here.
Unlike Raid Her, this game is pretty playable. (Raid Her is a cool idea, but it is realistically not playable atm, due to problematic controls and, more importantly, god awful interfacing and control (Let me the fuck out of the dungeon, and also make it so that the 'escape' interface is possible to use without instantly being recaptured))
Few notes tho:
First, not a single part of the game implies that you need to click on the enemy for attack skills. This led me to assume I had broken something.
Second, the 'acts' system is... confusing.
You can't do any acts (including things that one would assume would be forced, like 'rough' skills or 'bind') in a huge number of situations, but it is unclear why. For example, let's take 'bind', something that really feels like something I should be able to do with an uncooperative subject.
Maybe it is impossible to do so because the subject doesn't like me enough. I originally assumed it was either like or it was 'mind', but it's definitely not mind, as I can reduce that to 0 and still be blocked.
So... I like the idea behind a lot of this. But we run into the issue that we're willing to beat and enslave people, but not 'force' sexual acts, including literally restraining an individual, but we are allowed to put them on sexual display, etc.
If you want this to be a fetish game, let us do at least the expected acts (like rough acts and bind / dance etc.) to someone, at least at low mind.
If you want this to be a super mainstream non-fetish game, make it clear that we cannot 'be bad'.
Unlike Raid Her, this game is pretty playable. (Raid Her is a cool idea, but it is realistically not playable atm, due to problematic controls and, more importantly, god awful interfacing and control (Let me the fuck out of the dungeon, and also make it so that the 'escape' interface is possible to use without instantly being recaptured))
Few notes tho:
First, not a single part of the game implies that you need to click on the enemy for attack skills. This led me to assume I had broken something.
Second, the 'acts' system is... confusing.
You can't do any acts (including things that one would assume would be forced, like 'rough' skills or 'bind') in a huge number of situations, but it is unclear why. For example, let's take 'bind', something that really feels like something I should be able to do with an uncooperative subject.
Maybe it is impossible to do so because the subject doesn't like me enough. I originally assumed it was either like or it was 'mind', but it's definitely not mind, as I can reduce that to 0 and still be blocked.
So... I like the idea behind a lot of this. But we run into the issue that we're willing to beat and enslave people, but not 'force' sexual acts, including literally restraining an individual, but we are allowed to put them on sexual display, etc.
If you want this to be a fetish game, let us do at least the expected acts (like rough acts and bind / dance etc.) to someone, at least at low mind.
If you want this to be a super mainstream non-fetish game, make it clear that we cannot 'be bad'.
Scud74
Member
- Oct 12, 2017
- 451
- 489
keepherdev you're doing an excellent job my friend. Making two games sharing resources and assets is a great a idea to make it more financial viable for you/your team or include more people into the proyect to help you with the workload. Animations are still a little crude and combat is basic so far without proper balance which is expected to be like that for a 0.1/0.2 version, but everything else is getting really good (sound, FXs, ambience, artstyle, the core gameplay ideas, etc) and runs pretty well almost in any kind of hardware with a GPU. Just keep working like this, slow but steady, and in a few years when you release it be sure to cover a lot of sales platforms (Steam, DLsite, etc.)
Last edited:
losergf
New Member
- Mar 6, 2022
- 3
- 24
MyNameIsPalpaterare
Member
- Apr 12, 2018
- 280
- 81
Now, don't get me wrong, I understand the importance of consent, but putting it in a game where you literally take sex slaves makes no sense. Like if I captured someone and want to have sex with them, take their armor for myself, give them any item, why can they tell me no when they are in legit handcuffs and a cage? Shit is just weird and kinda goes against some of the premise of the game
Febui
Active Member
- May 6, 2022
- 604
- 762
I can't tell if it's just a disclaimer to not be banned from some sites and payment processors of it is actively a parody of the concept.
At any and all times, press one button for "I consent." It has to be a deliberate gag right? Like the dev is trying to say "You have an issue with fictional characters being assaulted? I'll just make a button that says it's all roleplay, shut up, nerds."
Right up there with "All the children are actually midgets and the animals are just people in costumes" from I think maybe LonaRPG? To its credit, that did work to get it passed Rule 7.
It was announced on discord that the public release would happen this week but didn't give a specific day. A few days at most now.