- Feb 25, 2024
- 1,419
- 2,960
- 349
E2 Survey closes in 48 Hours!
Provide anonymous feedback and rate the E2 girls here:
You must be registered to see the links
I answered exactly like you.I forgot, I was going to ask about this earlier. For those who filled out the survey, what did you answer regarding threesomes (and moresomes)? It's one where I would happily have picked more than one answer, but I personally prefer a "Bare Witness" style setup, where everyone is into each other, at least for the duration of the sexy times (outside of sexy times is cool too—I also answered that having girl/girl only is fine too, because I'm not threatened by lesbians). Having the "extra" girls just queueing up waiting their turn just seems weird to me. That's not a three/foursome, that's just having sex in someone else's presence, and then swapping out the partner at various points!
I don't like lesbian sex, so I'll never choose an option where I have to watch it. I'm generally not interested in threesomes or group sex since they usually include lesbian sex.I forgot, I was going to ask about this earlier. For those who filled out the survey, what did you answer regarding threesomes (and moresomes)? It's one where I would happily have picked more than one answer, but I personally prefer a "Bare Witness" style setup, where everyone is into each other, at least for the duration of the sexy times (outside of sexy times is cool too—I also answered that having girl/girl only is fine too, because I'm not threatened by lesbians). Having the "extra" girls just queueing up waiting their turn just seems weird to me. That's not a three/foursome, that's just having sex in someone else's presence, and then swapping out the partner at various points!
You can never have too many bisexualsI forgot, I was going to ask about this earlier. For those who filled out the survey, what did you answer regarding threesomes (and moresomes)? It's one where I would happily have picked more than one answer, but I personally prefer a "Bare Witness" style setup, where everyone is into each other, at least for the duration of the sexy times (outside of sexy times is cool too—I also answered that having girl/girl only is fine too, because I'm not threatened by lesbians). Having the "extra" girls just queueing up waiting their turn just seems weird to me. That's not a three/foursome, that's just having sex in someone else's presence, and then swapping out the partner at various points!
There is also the option of making it switchable, like in this game:The reason why it might not be possible is just because there's a lot on the character pages so space is a little tight but I'll consider this thanks
This game is set in London, I think, I don't know what unit of measurement they use in the UKHaving only metric measurements might not be true to the american setting of the game, but it would at least be user friendly.
You would say that!
This game is set in London, I think, I don't know what unit of measurement they use in the UK.
Both imperial and metric for different things. Plus some imperial measurements like stones that no one else uses!This game is set in London, I think, I don't know what unit of measurement they use in the UK.
Yes, there is enough space in all bios.And did it look quite readable when it appears in the girls' bios?
I chose the same. I find harems who only show interest in the MC a bit boring. Having everyone involved with everyone makes it feel like an actual relationship between the characters, and not just power fantasy.I forgot, I was going to ask about this earlier. For those who filled out the survey, what did you answer regarding threesomes (and moresomes)? It's one where I would happily have picked more than one answer, but I personally prefer a "Bare Witness" style setup, where everyone is into each other, at least for the duration of the sexy times (outside of sexy times is cool too—I also answered that having girl/girl only is fine too, because I'm not threatened by lesbians). Having the "extra" girls just queueing up waiting their turn just seems weird to me. That's not a three/foursome, that's just having sex in someone else's presence, and then swapping out the partner at various points!
This is spot on (I meant the first paragraph, but actually the bit about Lydia is probably spot on as well!)I chose the same. I find harems who only show interest in the MC a bit boring. Having everyone involved with everyone makes it feel like an actual relationship between the characters, and not just power fantasy.
Also, can you imagine Lydia not it getting on with the other girls in an orgy? That girl is equal opportunity thirsty. It would require rewriting her character.
I agree, to some extent. Having them run off and have fun without the MC *occasionally* is sometimes fun, but mostly only when it's when the MC is busy with someone else in the harem. i.e. "Ooh, that looks fun, I think I'll join!", or "The (MC) seems busy, but I'm horny as hell... who else is home?".I chose the same. I find harems who only show interest in the MC a bit boring. Having everyone involved with everyone makes it feel like an actual relationship between the characters, and not just power fantasy.
Also, can you imagine Lydia not it getting on with the other girls in an orgy? That girl is equal opportunity thirsty. It would require rewriting her character.
I agree, to some extent. Having them run off and have fun without the MC *occasionally* is sometimes fun, but mostly only when it's when the MC is busy with someone else in the harem. i.e. "Ooh, that looks fun, I think I'll join!", or "The (MC) seems busy, but I'm horny as hell... who else is home?".
At the risk of mentioning another game here, I'll just drop that Sisterly Lust had that same vibe - the MC got together with the girls both solo, and in groups, and frequently one of the harem girls would simply join right in, which made it that much hotter. And they sometimes got with each other when the MC was busy elsewhere. Basically an "all you can eat buffet, but just for those in the harem, never forgetting to involve the MC where possible".
I like where Elmwood U. is going so far, just trying to stay patient for more content, and would love to see it mirror this kind of setting and have the girls be open to almost anything, knowing they're in a harem.
Boo this man (or woman or enby) boo!I really hope its not going to go full Harem
Its been a while since Ive played, but I am fairly sure Nina only jokes about sending the selfie. I may be wrong though...My theories on how the girls will group into polycules based on my gut:
Anyway, yeah, that's my theories that no one asked for.
- Katie, Taylor, Violet (Katie gets love points if you suggest you'll need to date them all)
- Lydia, Chelsea, Ella (I feel like this one is a no brainer)
- Jordan, Chloe (Same here)
- The Twins
- The Twins, Saki, Molly
- Naomi, Riley (Naomi is really hyped about Riley, so I can see that leading to something)
- Nina, Novotna (Nina is a bad girl with an apparant appreciation of choking, and Veronika looks like she'd domme in the bedroom. Nina also sends her the cum selfie, which I think may be a clue)
- Katie, Taylor, Violet, Lydia, Chelsea, Ella. These six, plus at least one more will be the big harem route, I think. Paris, and the couple are both strong contenders, but I'm not writing off Serina yet. Her and Taylor are only step sisters after all. It could be all of them, but 7 is already a lot, so 10 seems unlikely.
There's an achievement for having a Harem of 6+, so at least 7 is reachable.Its been a while since Ive played, but I am fairly sure Nina only jokes about sending the selfie. I may be wrong though...
But yeah, some these are the sort of the groups I can see too. I cant see us going full blown 18 girl Harem, but 5 or 6 maybe. I still think the feminists are going to be solo runs though, like once youre with Katie, the rest are blocked off etc, though id be happy to be wrong