Nah, terrible take. The AI was very clearly noticeable and wonky imo. It really didn't "look good". Just because it could have been worse doesn't mean it's okay to do something subpar. I don't want faster updates if it means a decay in quality.
I felt that the AI felt a bit out of place, but with some tweaks and improvements, it could end up working well in the end.
If it actually ends up looking good then I'd have no issue with it. But in this particular update it was very noticeably AI and kinda just not good.
Like any tool, you have to know how and to what extent to use it (personally, I would prefer the classic sketched scene, knowing that it will improve in future releases, since in this case that section will remain as it is).
I didn't say it was better, I said it was decent and that it also could use a little more work. It's just astonishing to me that people are so opposed to single devs using AI in their works when it means it will make their work faster and easier, thus enabling them to achieve regular updates on time and most of all, won't affect any 3rd party's work since they're working on their project solo.
That reminds me those Devs that say "Hey guys, help me reach 4000 Subs and I'm gonna start working full time on this game and Updates will come faster"...that never happens XD. AI isn't gonna make the work faster and easier, it will make the Dev lazy.
