And so ? There's more than 6 000 games available here, just don't play games that have fetish you can't stand, they exist and there's enough of them to entertain you for the least decade.While i would like an ideal situation where the ability to "have the option" or "avoidable" fetishes can be implemented perfectly, in practice it's usually the opposite..
This thread is about the consequences of your choices, and it apply for NTR as well as pregnancy.[...] and then try to trap player in every decision with ntr if they picked just one wrong move, boom! and they can still claim that it's avoidable.
People who want the NTR content just try to make the right choices, in order to have the content they want to see. Presenting this as a "bad versus perfection" way to play is plain stupidity. In both case the player try to achieve the perfect play, from his point of view, and their isn't a good, nor a bad, point of view.Game-design wise this create bad experiences because for the ones who love the fetish they keep trying to be bad at that game and for the one who try to avoid it they become stressfully perfectionist..
It would be, but the reason why NTR is avoidable in those game isn't a decision made by the authors. It was imposed by a bunch of idiots who fail to understand that if a game have NTR content, it will have... NTR content. And like the idiots they are, once they see the first NTR scene, they complain like the little brats they are, saying that it's totally inadmissible that a game with NTR show NTR scenes.wouldn't it be better to just cater to a more focused target audience?
You know, the world is vast, and there's countries where both the parents and children are educated. Being on birth control at 15 isn't something strange in those countries. In most of them doctors even have the right to prescribe birth control pills to any girl asking for it, even on the back of the parents, and there's places where you can have them for free if you're minor.I always facepalm if you cum into your little sister and she tells you "its fine, I'm on birth control" ...no you are fucking not! You are like 15!
It's to be expected though. Most fetishes aren't based around the emotional devastation associated with NTR. Getting cucked IRL is no small thing and for people who get into stories, it's going to have an effect. Trying to explain to people who aren't into NTR why a person likes NTR is an impossibility, they simply can't understand the fetish. Attacking them for that is counterproductive and pointless. Just ignore them. Personally, I'm storyboarding an NTR (netori) game currently and I'm looking forward to the reactions.It would be, but the reason why NTR is avoidable in those game isn't a decision made by the authors. It was imposed by a bunch of idiots who fail to understand that if a game have NTR content, it will have... NTR content. And like the idiots they are, once they see the first NTR scene, they complain like the little brats they are, saying that it's totally inadmissible that a game with NTR show NTR scenes.
Be noted that, like Adabelitoo said, this kind of behavior happen almost only with NTR. We rarely see people complaining that they see water sport every single time they open the door of the toilets.
Feet are how we walk around. Without feet we wouldn't be mobile enough to provide for ourselves. Is it even a fetish?Incest aside, procreation is how we survive as a race. It's kind of a natural and basic thing. Is it even a fetish?
The human race wouldn't last very long trying to procreate with our feet.Feet are how we walk around. Without feet we wouldn't be mobile enough to provide for ourselves. Is it even a fetish?
What? You haven't heard of the podiatry baby boom of '64? tsk.The human race wouldn't last very long trying to procreate with our feet.
that's like the number one thing girls used to lie about when we were all teens, that it's okay they're on pills or something. so many times it later turned out that a girl had lied about the pill in the heat of the moment, and never told the guy unless they got pregnant and didn't want abortion. boys or girls, teens aren't reliable when it comes to prophylactics. the only way to make sure is to take care of it at your own end. (well, as 'sure' as possible to be sure.)I always facepalm if you cum into your little sister and she tells you "its fine, I'm on birth control" ...no you are fucking not! You are like 15!
How can it be expected that someone disliking a fetish, whatever which one, will play a game that explicitly state that it will contain this fetish ?It's to be expected though.
There's a difference between understanding a fetish, and to tolerate it.Most fetishes aren't based around the emotional devastation associated with NTR. Getting cucked IRL is no small thing and for people who get into stories, it's going to have an effect. Trying to explain to people who aren't into NTR why a person likes NTR is an impossibility, they simply can't understand the fetish.
The chance a "one off" baby from such, would have defects, probably quite similar to you would have the same...
Real problems comes from generations of turning the gene pool into still water...
Its a joke, but you're both wrong. There is a shit ton of psychological effects on the kid not to mention the high risk of defects even on first generation of inbreds.You can't be that retarded. Incest-Children from the first few generations are 100% normal. You have to practice incest over multiple generations to see any problems come up.
And Yes, Pregnancy should be an option in every Game. I always facepalm if you cum into your little sister and she tells you "its fine, I'm on birth control" ...no you are fucking not! You are like 15!
You're acting like a foot fetish and NTR are comparable fetishes. They aren't. A person likes feet or they don't. That's the end of it. And yeah, pregnancy is further up the emotional chart, and depending on how it happens, can also be pretty emotionally devastating, but pregnancy is still a normal part of everyday life. Getting cucked on the other hand. That's visceral.There's a difference between understanding a fetish, and to tolerate it.
Few fetishes can be understood by people who don't like them. What make people like pain or humiliation, are turned on when they see feet or serve as toilet, and so on ? It's a mystery for people who don't have this fetish, and sometimes even for people who have it. Yet, people are tolerant, they don't share this liking but understand that some can.
Just look at this thread. There's people who said that they dislike pregnancy, one even expressed some disgust, yet the only person who complained did it by forcing the fetish he hate into a discussion where it don't have its place.
So, sorry, but it's not a question of understanding, it's a question of personal behavior. And saying this isn't an attack, it's just stating an obvious fact.
You say that NTR and foot fetish aren't comparable but it seems like you don't understand what NTR is about to know if they are comparable or not.You're acting like a foot fetish and NTR are comparable fetishes. They aren't. A person likes feet or they don't. That's the end of it. And yeah, pregnancy is further up the emotional chart, and depending on how it happens, can also be pretty emotionally devastating, but pregnancy is still a normal part of everyday life. Getting cucked on the other hand. That's visceral.
It's emotionally devastating in every sense of the word. At no point is seeing a loved one nailed by someone else not devastating. For some people, that's the fetish. For others, it's an abomination. Expecting people to have level reactions on either side is fairly simple-minded, to be honest. How you perceive it is moot.
There's a huge intrinsic difference in how people view and react to fiction. The reaction to this particular fetish is evidence of that. The inability of people who truly enjoy NTR to even comprehend this is very telling.So quoting your own sentence: A person likes feet or they don't. That's the end of it. A person likes those situations or they don't. That's the end of it. Honestly I don't get what people like from footjobs so I won't say if they are comparable or not, but according the logic I quote from you then yes, they seem comparable after all.
if that were true, why wouldn't the mc being the 'bad boy' be the far superior version of this? it would have what you think as ntr + it would be massively magnified by YOU winning instead of some random other guy?The main reason why some people can enjoy NTR is watching the girl fall for the bad guy even against all common sense just because the girl got so slutty that she needs and loves the bad guy more than what she needs oxygen.
No, the reaction to this fetish is at the opposite the evidence that some people can't make the difference between fiction and reality. They are reacting with anger because a fictional character for who they have fictional feelings is fictionally fucked by someone other than the fictional character that they are witnessing at a first or third person point of view.There's a huge intrinsic difference in how people view and react to fiction. The reaction to this particular fetish is evidence of that.
An interesting comment that would have had more impact if it was said to people who enjoy NTR. I can't say for sure for Adabelitoo , but personally I dislike it and don't play, nor even test, games where it's not avoidable.The inability of people who truly enjoy NTR to even comprehend this is very telling.
Sorry but my inability to comprehend something must be playing a part here because I truly don't understand what you mean and the relationship with my quote. My intention was to point out that you were saying that two things weren't comparable when it really doesn't seems like you understand one of those things you were talking about.There's a huge intrinsic difference in how people view and react to fiction. The reaction to this particular fetish is evidence of that. The inability of people who truly enjoy NTR to even comprehend this is very telling.
There are a lot of cases where the MC is the bad boy and that's called NTR anyway even if it isn't the case. There are a lot of cases where the MC is the good boy and makes all the girls his mindless bitches even if the girl already have a boyfriend/husband and nobody call that NTR, they call it harem.if that were true, why wouldn't the mc being the 'bad boy' be the far superior version of this? it would have what you think as ntr + it would be massively magnified by YOU winning instead of some random other guy?
Well, it would be "healthier" for those who don't like/understand NTR if they identifiy as the bad guy (or the non-mc character as I think you're refering to) but here is the big trick which also applies to the other quote: you aren't identifying yourself with anyone.there's no such thing as preferably identifying with a non-mc character. it can of course happen by ACCIDENT if the npc character is better written than mc, but if it does, it means the writer failed and should change that stronger npc into mc.
This has always been an interesting take on why people should or shouldn't react to a story a certain way. I understand that some people will read a book, watch a movie, go to a play, or experience a plot based game and have no emotional attachment throughout the plot. I understand that. But, what is interesting, is the people who apparently cannot understand that is not the norm. A simple google search will reveal that most bibliophiles are addicted to books because they are escapes for them, books allow them to escape into other worlds and be other people for a while. A plot based game isn't really that different.No, the reaction to this fetish is at the opposite the evidence that some people can't make the difference between fiction and reality. They are reacting with anger because a fictional character for who they have fictional feelings is fictionally fucked by someone other than the fictional character that they are witnessing at a first or third person point of view.
You tried to use my logic to state that yes, footjobs and NTR are comparable. I stated that, no, on every existing level of measurement, they are not for people who don't like NTR. I'm not sure what you are failing to see.Sorry but my inability to comprehend something must be playing a part here because I truly don't understand what you mean and the relationship with my quote. My intention was to point out that you were saying that two things weren't comparable when it really doesn't seems like you understand one of those things you were talking about.