i agree and disagree since it's a slippery slope. The principle is "they never gave permission for their work to be used" I don't see any difference in people using models of characters they don't own to make porn and make money off that porn/content. A lot of people don't think this way since they hate A.I for the very same thing people have been doing to each other before technology was this advanced and readily available. I'm not gonna disagree that A.I doesn't steal art to create the content but it's the new scapegoat to what was before a human problem.People who made assets for Unreal were paid.
People's art that got used to train AI models were not.
Disliking AI on principal has a good foundational reason.
That said, there are some artists, who train an AI model based on all their own art, and use it to speed up the process with just some light editing required, and imo, that's fine.
So yeah, it's "don't hate the tool" technically, but the reality is that most AI art is made, using models trained on art without credit or compensation of the original artists. Which does have some moral quandaries.
THAT ALSO BEING SAID: People have been using other's art as inspiration since the beginning of art. Art classes often have you recreate famous pieces and learn the styles of different artists so that you can eventually grow into your own style. From a logistical standpoint....that's no different than what AI is doing. As long as you're not using AI to create something and represent it as art from a specific artist or artists, I really see it as no different than someone just learning to create anyway, albeit en-masse.
The En-Masse also becomes a problem though, since the energy requirements to make AI Art are also problematic at the current time, but that's a problem that will resolve as the tech gets better as well.
I feel the same but sadly when A.I is even mentioned or a part of a project it will always devolve into this discussionI am starting to think that maybe AI Art like NTR or discussing other titles should be left at the door in terms of posting about it.
Personally I don't care what a person's individual opinion of AI Art is myself, I just want to see posts about the game not listen to dissertations on Art theft on a Pirate website.
That would be in line with the history of the fallout series.They take the sperm directly from the balls and artificially inseminate the women?
Same here.windows flagged it as a trojan "Trojan:Script/Wacatac.B!ml"
windows flagged it as a trojan "Trojan:Script/Wacatac.B!ml"
I've found 2 anal scenes so far.Yet another game with "booty" in the title, where anal sex is not featured...
View attachment 4149468
This is also a very common false negative because it looks similar to scripts used in a lot of game engines.windows flagged it as a trojan "Trojan:Script/Wacatac.B!ml"
i mean there are tons of other games of other I.Ps on this site too i highly doubt Bethesda caresAll arguments here are moot points as this creator, and likely this site for hosting this game will be sued into Oblivion by Bethesda. It is not like they haven't done that hundreds upon hundreds of times already. The game's creator has to hope the game gets no traction and goes unnoticed or the litigation hammer of Bethesda will swing down.
It's prob the lounge vibrator scene (lewd request) you're missing. you need to select the 'Moist' dialogue option to trigger itGot 13/14 of all scenes, did every objective and pumped her stats to max and still couldn't get the last one.
Is there really only one scene of the overseer's daughter? Also, do the guards and the sexbot get any scenes at all?