I would think being forced by a girl would indicate greater weakness than doing it willinglyMaybe I should create an extra thread but I thought asking here might also make sense.
Can someone recommend me a few games where the MC is not displayed as a weak looser? Obviously, this means that the femdom is likely forced upon him. Karlsson's Gambit is the only game which I've played where it is somewhat like that and the MC also has a dominant path which is the cherry on top for me. Thanks in advance.
Is it worth downloading and playing it?New game (tagged Femdom): "Heir's Tribute Masochistic Transformation Plan":
https://f95zone.to/threads/heirs-tribute-masochistic-transformation-plan-final-unique-m.188226/
Very interesting game.An update of the game "Fear the Dark Shadows" has been released:
https://f95zone.to/threads/fear-the-dark-shadows-v0-3-0-ftdsd.168322/
It got more or less dropped. There was a special side story of one of the girls that had femdom but that's not getting any updates.How's House in the Rift now? I played it ages ago and the relationship with the first girl you meet flirted with femdom but never seemed to quite get there.
I very much enjoyed this game, it's not your standard femdom, it's more of a 'mind break through pleasure', 'turning MC into your puppet' kind of femdom. Good stuff overall if you're into that. If you're not, no sweat.Is it worth downloading and playing it?
Depends on what you mean by "weak loser". Do you mean a protagonist that can act cocky and dominant, at least on some paths, in a femdom game? (kinda like the one in KG) And, if so, are you also into it if the point of the game is that that character will get defeated/tamed/enslaved by female characters by the end of the story?Maybe I should create an extra thread but I thought asking here might also make sense.
Can someone recommend me a few games where the MC is not displayed as a weak looser? Obviously, this means that the femdom is likely forced upon him. Karlsson's Gambit is the only game which I've played where it is somewhat like that and the MC also has a dominant path which is the cherry on top for me. Thanks in advance.
Depends on whether the protagonist had any option to resist in the first place. Some of these games are fantasy/sci-fi or in other genres where women can be stronger than men, and even irl blackmail, if you're a man with an image to preserve and/or a position of power or wealth that you want to hold on to, (or married with a wife you love, or a million other scenarios) is a powerful weapon that can easily force a man to submit or obey a physically weaker woman.I would think being forced by a girl would indicate greater weakness than doing it willingly
If I give a girl power over me willingly, I'm just showing that I enjoy letting her have control, but also that it's my choice and I could retake that power at any time if I want to.
I disagree, if they were stronger, they wouldn't be blackmailed (defang the blackmail by refusing to play that game), and would have the strength to fight out of the circumstances, the fact that they do not is weaknessTL;DR a male character blackmailed or forced by circumstance to submit to a woman can fully resent the experience and try to stay defiant throughout, and I think such a character would at least be conventionally perceived as "stronger" than someone who willingly submits to a woman of their own accord, although I agree this conventional perception can be challenged. (after all, exposing oneself to blackmail can also be perceived as a "weakness",but it gets murkier with scenarios of mind control and other fictional plot devices)
I disagree. Nobody is an omnipotent god - there are circumstances you just physically can't beat, even if you fight against them. To give an extreme example, I could talk about ghetto or concentration camp uprisings that failed and the rebels all died in spite of their valiant resistance, but I'm sure even you can imagine IRL many circumstances you, or even the strongest person you can imagine, won't be able to overcome, and this idea that "strong" people ALWAYS fight out of the circumstances is very socially darwinistic and just plain wrong. IMO It's the kind of thinking that gets people to support silly things like anarcho-capitalism or to hate "welfare queens"... (I'm not saying you're some far right liberatarian, but that almost all of them have this kind of victim-blaming mindset and a lot of their bad ideas stem from it)I disagree, if they were stronger, they wouldn't be blackmailed (defang the blackmail by refusing to play that game), and would have the strength to fight out of the circumstances, the fact that they do not is weakness
That doesn't really make much sense. You can be physically strong and still be blackmailed. If a female character had dirt on an MC or just in a position to get him arrested, lose his reputation, lose his job/position or lose is wife, or it could lead to vigilante justice against him. Depending on the situation, it could be foolish for him to just try to fight that. It wouldn't even be strength, especially if he's trying to fight women weaker than him, it would just be stupidity. If a man was cunning, he could maybe play along until an opportunity arises or would have maybe covered his bases ahead of time, but this has nothing to do with strength.I disagree, if they were stronger, they wouldn't be blackmailed (defang the blackmail by refusing to play that game), and would have the strength to fight out of the circumstances, the fact that they do not is weakness
It isn't just about physical strength, it's also mental strength. Blackmail is not only a weak weapon, as once used it has no more power, it's also illegal, a mentally strong individual would be able to use those facts against the blackmailer, perhaps even turning the tables completely.That doesn't really make much sense. You can be physically strong and still be blackmailed. If a female character had dirt on an MC or just in a position to get him arrested, lose his reputation, lose his job/position or lose is wife, or it could lead to vigilante justice against him. Depending on the situation, it could be foolish for him to just try to fight that. It wouldn't even be strength, especially if he's trying to fight women weaker than him, it would just be stupidity. If a man was cunning, he could maybe play along until an opportunity arises or would have maybe covered his bases ahead of time, but this has nothing to do with strength.
If someone was to make a femdom game, and a brute strength approach by the mc would just result in him getting hospitalized or removed from the story, it wouldn't really make sense to allow for those options unless you want a game that can result in an early loss condition.
Notice how pretty much every regime that had that form of oppression eventually fell, The Confederacy, Segregated South, Nazi Germany, Colonialization in Africa and Asia, the Soviet bloc, the list goes on. They didn't just fall on their own, a significant part of their downfalls were people fighting back against the oppression.I disagree. Nobody is an omnipotent god - there are circumstances you just physically can't beat, even if you fight against them. To give an extreme example, I could talk about ghetto or concentration camp uprisings that failed and the rebels all died in spite of their valiant resistance, but I'm sure even you can imagine IRL many circumstances you, or even the strongest person you can imagine, won't be able to overcome, and this idea that "strong" people ALWAYS fight out of the circumstances is very socially darwinistic and just plain wrong.
What do you mean by "that form of oppression"? What form? This is off topic, but the societies you give as examples are a bit all over the place, and I'd struggle to pin down any common form of opprrssion practiced by all of them... (sure, they were all oppressive in some capacity, but the extent, methods, targeted groups and reasons for the fall of those systems are all extremely different...)It isn't just about physical strength, it's also mental strength. Blackmail is not only a weak weapon, as once used it has no more power, it's also illegal, a mentally strong individual would be able to use those facts against the blackmailer, perhaps even turning the tables completely.
Notice how pretty much every regime that had that form of oppression eventually fell, The Confederacy, Segregated South, Nazi Germany, Colonialization in Africa and Asia, the Soviet bloc, the list goes on. They didn't just fall on their own, a significant part of their downfalls were people fighting back against the oppression.
I was speaking more of brutal oppression in general, each of those situations had some form of that, from the treatment of slaves, to lynchings in segregation south to gulags in the USSR and brutal military crackdowns, to concentration camps, etc.What do you mean by "that form of oppression"? What form? This is off topic, but the societies you give as examples are a bit all over the place, and I'd struggle to pin down any common form of opprrssion practiced by all of them... (sure, they were all oppressive in some capacity, but the extent, methods, targeted groups and reasons for the fall of those systems are all extremely different...)
Also, more to the topic at hand, again, the point I was making there is that individual humans often can't overcome horrible circumstances, no matter if they resist them or not, due to factors outside their control, not because they're mentally "weak".
I was deep in my thoughts here and I remembered playing this game called