Some of your groupings are questionable.
Fantastic - Furry is quite big and is essentially it's own fetish. People into tentacle rape and grotesque monsters raping women are not the same target audience as people who like cat girls and anthropomorphic dogs.
Corruption - Incest is similarly too large and diverse to group under corruption. Corruption as a tag denotes moral degeneration and "falling" of a character throughout the story. Incest can be part of such a story, but more often than not, it doesn't delve into such themes. Corruption doesn't have anything to do with "having sex with people you should not have sex with."
NTR - People who like NTR probably likes netori as well, but the reverse is not true in the vast majority of cases.
Body builds - Pregnancy, for most people, is not a basic attraction to a pregnant body.
Harem - putting this in "others" is not necessarily wrong, but it's a pretty big tag in itself.
I can't answer most of these because of the fundamental clashes. many of the options pair things I love with things I loathe. you need to design better choices to get meaningful answers. maybe do several polls? we love polls. most of the good polls are too dated.
Agreed.
Another example of how grouping doesn't really work:
Tentacles = Unique and interesting and can be used creatively in many ways. Doesn't even have to be a real "creature" but can still act life-like. Doesn't even have to be sentient or even realistic in terms of biology.
Beast = Not the same as tentacles, since it's pretty specifically designed to be whatever exact animal the audience wants.
These are very different things, as different as (casual non judgy example) how furry is different then beast.
"NTR (cuckold someone or being cuckolded)" grouping those 2 would be like saying fucking in the ass and being fucked in the ass is the same fetish...
Here I'm starting to scratch my head a bit.
The options in a group are alternatives to each other. Sometimes I used the "or" (like in the NTR list, and in other lists), sometimes the commas, but they are alternatives.
I didn't specify this, but frankly it seems pretty clear and obvious.
Said that, I explained in the very first post that the max number of options is 10 and the very reason to make this pool was to include a lot of common fetish left out in the other one, so no, I won't regroup the list differently to give a specific fetish a place all for itself -cutting off some others- because apparently it needs its personal space and some alone time, lol.
Since I can't make only a list of tentacles, catgirls, doggirls, rabbitgirls, succubus, cute yuki-onna, cute alien, and whatever else, they end up all grouped in fantastic. For me that works perfectly fine.
The same way I can't make a list of all (the most common) subfetishes in bdsm, which probably goes up to 20, and then duplicate it between passive and active.
Yet no one voting for bdsm had any problem with the list as it is, and protested because "I like spanking but not to be spanked; I like ponygirls, but not bondage; I like scat, but not enemas!".
And I'm starting to wonder why.
Why BDSMer didn't feel the need to have their own specific fetish by itself, but why other feticists do feel this need.
Hey this can be a very interesting argument of debate! Going to open a topic!
