OP has been updated to 0.9.0c. All reported bugs and issues so far have been fixed.
Thriving: "prosperous and growing":
The city
is thriving, its technological and economic advancements surpassing all previous incarnations of Arcadia, even while it was under the threat of the darkness.
While efforts were made to portray nuance in the city’s status and Queen Aurora’s rule, the dawn of this post-darkness era brings undeniable progress. To call these developments anything less than thriving would seem pessimistic. Particularly in this conversation, where there's a city-wide celebration with fireworks, and a new princess is being crowned, and you're having a conversation with said princess...
I've been working on incorporating more subtext in my writing, but I always worry that some readers might miss the underlying meaning. Here’s one such example: No, the protagonist isn't simply saying that "Luna standing here" is enough. Luna is actively working to heal the nation by stepping into her role as its ruler.
The protagonist is reflecting on the idea that if Luna clings to her current mindset, she’ll never attain the peace she seeks, because Midnight’s actions can never be fully redeemed. However, by declaring her intent and proving it through action, she demonstrates immense strength. If she fully commits to this path, she more than deserves to find peace.
Koster, it sounds like you're not in the right mental state to enjoy the game right now. I appreciate the bug reports a lot, and have fixed them in 0.9.0c. However, your ranting here often comes off as shallow and dismissive, unwilling to explore or challenge deeper themes in the story, and very much considering any attempts at such storytelling to be an inherent flaw. While not the most prudent argument, it's worth pointing out that you're the only person that found issue with the protagonist's speech in this scene. In this instance, your reaction reflects upon you and your own thoughts more than it does my own story. I think challenging the protagonist here is actually a great thing. He's supposed to be a somewhat relatable character, but he isn't gospel, and he isn't always right. However, you seem to think that if the protagonist is wrong, that means the writing is bad.
This scene is establishing that as a main theme of act 2. I can't spoil it now, but disagreeing with the protagonist here is a perfectly normal reaction.
I recommend taking a break and coming back to it later.