- Apr 26, 2020
- 15,679
- 36,604
I see that one of the latest 1 star reviews is by a TRUE alpha who apparently has decided that all of us who likes this VN are completely deranged!
I am definitely derangedI see that one of the latest 1 star reviews is by a TRUE alpha who apparently has decided that all of us who likes this VN are completely deranged!
Yeah, same here actually.......but I'm fairly certain he meant it as something negativeI am definitely deranged
Well, we are deranged and we know it. He is deranged and try looks like he isnt. What is worse?Yeah, same here actually.......but I'm fairly certain he meant it as something negative
For me either way is true.Yeah, same here actually.......but I'm fairly certain he meant it as something negative
I'm even certified. By 3 doctors. And got retired because of it.Yeah, same here actually.......but I'm fairly certain he meant it as something negative
Because, the sky is blue?... ..or the water wet ? or just because saying somthing negative is far easier than saying somethin positive ? ....or just becauseIf it doesn't have the Tag for that then Why complain about that
Zelda ist die Streberin welche MC in teil 1 gegen ein paar "Bullies" verteidigt, und mit welcher er und Tante Liz, später einen flotten 3er haben, (in teil 2) / Zelda is the nerdy girl which MC, in part 1, defends against some Bullies, and later on has a 3some together with aunt Liz (in part 2)what's the deal with this Zelda? I don't remember seeing it before
...that he is trying to look smart?...Well, we are deranged and we know it. He is deranged and try looks like he isnt. What is worse?
dankeZelda ist die Streberin welche MC in teil 1 gegen ein paar "Bullies" verteidigt, und mit welcher er und Tante Liz, später einen flotten 3er haben, (in teil 2) / Zelda is the nerdy girl which MC, in part 1, defends against some Bullies, and later on has a 3some together with aunt Liz (in part 2)
Not disagreeing with your point in general but it's kinda unobjective negatively rating a game for not having animations when there's no animations tag. That'd be like negatively rating the game because there's no necrophilia or NTR in it.Does this game have animations? No. But it's not pretending to either. I can understand rating lower than you otherwise would if you prefer animations,
Makes me wonder if Zelda, who loves cosplay, would one day dress up as the video game character with her name.Zelda ist die Streberin welche MC in teil 1 gegen ein paar "Bullies" verteidigt, und mit welcher er und Tante Liz, später einen flotten 3er haben, (in teil 2) / Zelda is the nerdy girl which MC, in part 1, defends against some Bullies, and later on has a 3some together with aunt Liz (in part 2)
Yea no that's fair.Not disagreeing with your point in general but it's kinda unobjective negatively rating a game for not having animations when there's no animations tag. That'd be like negatively rating the game because there's no necrophilia or NTR in it.
Point was that anyone negatively reviewing the game because it didn't have that content would be ridiculous because there's no reason to expect the game would've had that content, kinda like animations. Like I get what you're saying and animations are a big thing for a lot of people, myself included but if there's no tag then there's no expectation and shouldn't be any disappointment. I think saying it'd be better with animations is fair play but impacting the rating because there aren't any isn't so much, especially for the odd loser giving it a 1-2 star review with no negatives other than no animations.Kinda conflicted on your point about necro or NTR, because specifically those are things that don't lend themselves to most games, they wouldn't and couldn't be expected of most games. Where's something like animation, could, though shouldn't, be expected of most games.
That only tells us that your "review ethic" is high and if I read a review from you, it becomes more weightfull in the decision to play a game or not.Point was that anyone negatively reviewing the game because it didn't have that content would be ridiculous because there's no reason to expect the game would've had that content, kinda like animations. Like I get what you're saying and animations are a big thing for a lot of people, myself included but if there's no tag then there's no expectation and shouldn't be any disappointment. I think saying it'd be better with animations is fair play but impacting the rating because there aren't any isn't so much, especially for the odd loser giving it a 1-2 star review with no negatives other than no animations.
Then again I'm probably just salty because my 5* review was removed with no given reason other than "read the review rules" which I did before I posted it and I'm now barred from posting a new one.