Decided to look at some of the reviews after seeing some of the regulars talking about them.
They're very interesting. Tell you a lot about the average person who uses this site.
Like some of the low rating reviews do have some good points in general, but show a fundamental misunderstanding of what this game is.
Does this have an amazingly written and detailed story? No, is it trying to? Also no. Some games on this site are actual novels, this game is a comic you find in a newspaper. They're completely different things, released on different time frames, with different goals. Also, weird of people who haven't read the rules for reviews to talk about the quality of writing, I mean, name dropping multiple different games you think are amazing while thrashing this one is moronic.
Does this game have animations? No. But it's not pretending to either. I can understand rating lower than you otherwise would if you prefer animations, but some people are putting way too much importance on a game having animations or not. Some people stop just short of saying "an amazing game that I really enjoyed but there's no animations so I'm giving this one star", like that's madness.