- Oct 19, 2022
- 4,249
- 8,118
The only context I provided was why I had that association. So I'm not sure how my context could be flawed, but my association not flawed. I've read every one of your posts my guy repeatedly at this point, to make sure I'm not the one high on my supply.READ.
I never, not once, said there was a flaw in your personal associations.
I said, quite fucking specifically, that there was a flaw "in the context you'd provided".
I actually said that "You seem to have overlooked a key aspect", of the context you provided.
Because you had.
Stop inventing things, that I never said, to argue with.
You seem to be conflating my associations with mc's and arguing from the position that they should be different.
I don't agree with that supposition as MC is a self insert, but even if he was a fully realized character, I'd still make the associations I make as the reader based off the context in my life because it's my brain doing the reading. The association is there regardless.
Now if this were some deep nuanced story I might need to look past those initial associations to see the real story but as this is basically the turbo sex encounter 12000 for maximum falsification simulator, all that matters is the association in my brain... Why would I push past that to something that grosses me out, when my gut response works well enough?
Last edited: