- Jun 11, 2017
- 1,497
- 36,690

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
You must be registered to see the links
This is the set for April. Sorry I didn't manage to run the poll.
Yup, it will be used as a "narrative obstacle" to slow down the MC-Charlotte romance that has been building in the last two updates. I suspect that Suzi's and possibly Emma's paths will be given time to catch up with Charlie's and Lucy's.No, but she will be scared the fuck of him now.
I can't really argue with you on your points, but he was not hired to be a PI and solve any case, he was hired as a body guard and has done a good job so far. The dirty cop was the one that was supposed to be solving the case but it was a rigged game from the beginning.And the only thing the MC finds strange is that a stalker would pay someone else to take pictures of who he's stalking.
And that is the only thing he actually get right it is strange.
It's just not the only strange thing thats happended he just hasn't notice any of the other stuff.
So where I would be more than happy to have the MC on myside in a fight I personally wouldn't trust him to look after my bike to stop it being nicked.
I respectfully disagree, for the reasons I outline in my earlier post. I see what you mean, but to keep the story focused on the Lloyd family and their relationship with MC, they will treat it as self-defense.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
I get it... and I read your post. It was well expressed and it made sense, especially the part about not using his gun, but I am generally of the opinion no one has the right to take another person's life unless it is a you or them situation. We can all argue, or just give me the beloved facepalm, what is self-defense and what is not, but at the end of the day, I will maintain there is rarely a need to kill someone and in this case, there was no immediate threat. "Could" there have been some future threat? Yes. "Could" all of their lives been in danger? Yes, but it's just as likely they could have found another less lethal way to deal with it. It's like the old argument, if you could go back in time and kill (insert favorite mass murderer here) before they committed a crime, would you do it?I respectfully disagree, for the reasons I outline in my earlier post. I see what you mean, but to keep the story focused on the Lloyd family and their relationship with MC, they will treat it as self-defense.
And yes... you're probably right about the approach the dev will take.I respectfully disagree, for the reasons I outline in my earlier post. I see what you mean, but to keep the story focused on the Lloyd family and their relationship with MC, they will treat it as self-defense.
Edit: You could argue that it was mutual combat, in which case self-defense cannot be argued. But given the evidence that would be available for trial and Charlie's testimony, good luck convincing a jury.
I get it. You're making the moral case, whereas I am making a strict legal case. I'd like to think that, had it been me, I wouldn't have killed him either. I agree that I would have preferred a choice there.I get it... and I read your post. It was well expressed and it made sense, especially the part about not using his gun, but I am generally of the opinion no one has the right to take another person's life unless it is a you or them situation. We can all argue, or just give me the beloved facepalm, what is self-defense and what is not, but at the end of the day, I will maintain there is rarely a need to kill someone and in this case, there was no immediate threat. "Could" there have been some future threat? Yes. "Could" all of their lives been in danger? Yes, but it's just as likely they could have found another less lethal way to deal with it. It's like the old argument, if you could go back in time and kill (insert favorite mass murderer here) before they committed a crime, would you do it?
I don't know what the right answer it, but for me, my answer would be no. If the dev had given the player the option, I would have also chosen no... but that's just me.
naww he was nutzo crazy ... due to the dead model emma .... for some reason he wanted the girls dead and MC .. what i get out of reading the storyI get it. You're making the moral case, whereas I am making a strict legal case. I'd like to think that, had it been me, I wouldn't have killed him either. I agree that I would have preferred a choice there.
Also, if I ever facepalm anyone, I feel I owe them an explanation. Just seems the courteous thing to do.
Is hillside a harem?Hillside was already one of the best VNs on the site but this update moved it up a few notches. I love how the dev deals with the characters with love and extreme care. All the relationships are fleshed out and the latest episode moves the narrative enough to make it way more interesting. Can't wait for the next chapter.