- Dec 17, 2017
- 35
- 10
- Thread starter Muff Diver
- Start date
- Feb 25, 2017
- 1,214
- 789
- Dec 9, 2017
- 678
- 798
- Dec 21, 2017
- 97
- 117
You guys realize that the update after this one will basically allow you to have a threesome with Vicky and every single other girl in the game right?
- Aug 25, 2017
- 18
- 19
I dont know if im being an idiot right here but i cant really uncensor the game base on the previous post.
- May 7, 2017
- 173
- 61
In 0.19.0 announcement on the official discord :
-For 0.19.0, UN-censoring the game is not currently working. This is due to changes we're making for the camera system that, well, let's just say have been highly requested for some time
-Edit/Addition: For 0.19.0 we're also aware that the player is...glistening.
- May 31, 2017
- 103
- 107
then it might be the engine their using. too much stuff it needs to load. like the old school loading screen.
Literally previous update. 0.18.2. They updated sex scenes for all characters.
- Jul 17, 2017
- 2,160
- 1,982
Have you tried rivatuner? Check the settings in game for vsync and try it with and without.
I think the coil whining in this game for me was due to either dynamic lighting or shadows, try disabling one or both.
- Jul 27, 2019
- 286
- 573
If any of you have a Pi Hole running, blacklist l1-1.anzu.io to block the injected adverts that were recently added to the game's backyard billboards (and any other games that use this). You could add it to your hosts file if you don't have a pi hole.
I hope that vile ad firm is paying you folks well, because this shit sucks Erasmus.
I hope that vile ad firm is paying you folks well, because this shit sucks Erasmus.
Last edited:
I hope you realize that the number of people running Pi-Hole is tiny, and in fact most wont even know what it is.
- May 7, 2017
- 173
- 61
Only steam version, due to steam rules.
All other platform are not.
From what i understand from the official discord, the uncensoring dlc is borked in 0.19 due to engine change. We might get more information when 0.19.1 will be published.
I'm not a Patreon (I did however buy the game on Steam), but I'd be really hard pressed to be believe that at some point back those on Patreon essentially voted "more Grumps and less sex content". Much less that said patronage consists of anything more then a very very small minority who would actually prefer any real development time/investment being made on gay content.
I'd more guess that direction was strictly driven from the dev side in the hopes that attempting to present a more PC front in the current social climate would result in more overall sales for a game that had already started to stale out. Maybe it did. But I wouldn't bet on that net positive gain being all that big since again...this was game was never really set up well for that to begin with.
Last edited:
Looking into size of their team (check credits for devs, artists, writers), and actual number of Patron members, I do not think their Patron is anymore major contributior to their financing of the game.
On their website they brag with over 700,000 game copies sold, so I'm pretty sure most of their financing now is thought digital sales on Steam and other platforms.
If you think about that, Game Grumps content was great marketing material, that exposed the game to more players then it normally would. So from that perspective it was huge success.
Steam Database link with chars:
On their website they brag with over 700,000 game copies sold, so I'm pretty sure most of their financing now is thought digital sales on Steam and other platforms.
If you think about that, Game Grumps content was great marketing material, that exposed the game to more players then it normally would. So from that perspective it was huge success.
Steam Database link with chars:
You must be registered to see the links
Last edited:
I don't think sales were ever staling out. I still see this game on the top sellers chart on the Steam Indie charts all the time.
The Grumps were added to the game because of a contest that the devs ran. They were fans of the game, and officially entered, and obviously won due to their fanbase voting for them. The female winner was also a YouTuber, but just not as big, and more adult-oriented and more of a good fit for the game. I also see gay content asked for a lot, and I have been a Patron for a long time. They put polls out and the guys get a lot of votes for direction of new content, though not as much as the females admittedly.
Even if you are right though, I don't see an issue with it. I'm not here for the Grumps or gay content either, but I know there is more content coming that I DO want down the line, so if putting a couple of goofballs in the game and allowing the player to suck a few dicks allows the company to continue doing what they do, then what's the issue? I don't really understand the mindset that the entire product is ruined for you because there's optional content available in it that you don't like.