MarshmallowCasserole
Active Member
- Jun 7, 2018
- 862
- 2,022
- 411
There's a play on Godwin's law that a sufficiently long discussion of a porn game leads to a food-based analogy. Anyway, I like this one.In my own place, I prepare an ice cream sundae and yes, I spit on it. Some of my customers enjoy this; they actually like it. And yes, people like that do exist.
Most importantly, we clearly tell every customer who orders the sundae, right from the start, that it is spat on. This is part of the recipe and the experience we are offering. Nothing is hidden and no one is being deceived.
So the real question is why someone who dislikes this would still choose to eat it. And even if they don’t, why they feel the need to demand that this place be shut down immediately and that this product should no longer be sold to others who knowingly enjoy it.
First, let's talk why some people would never eat at your establishment. This is beause they deem the risks associated with an order mix up unacceptable. Let's be real, your sundaes aren't magical, I can have similar or better ones elsewhere, so why would I risk getting spit in mine? Food with spit and without looks the same, so it's easy to order regular food, only to end up eating spit. And realistically, you will not compensate your customers for that. Simple refund is not enough: a person won't eat food with spit even if it was free, so you'd have to pay them, and a lot. Which we know you won't do (this is where the analogy breaks a little, a restaraunt maybe can reimburse customers for a mistake, but a video game dev? Not a chance)
So that is the reason your restaurant instantly loses a part of your audience. Now your customers are either indifferent or enthusiastic about spit. Now there's less reason to pour effort in base food, and more reason to enhance, ahem, the experience. (It doesn't always happen, sometimes a game just dips its toes in a fetish and leaves it at that, but you have to see the incentive to go all in.)
So you hire Spit Bae. You adorn your place with images of people spitting. That indifferent part of your audience? A large part of it is gone because it's one thing knowing your food may by mistake have a certain ingredient, a small chance, and another thing to see your staff spit all over the neighbouring table as a premium experience.
Back to the NTR discussion, this would be me. Echoing what balitz Method said, I'd be more ok with NTR games, if the basics weren't usually such garbage without an ounce of originality. But in order to enchance the fetish, they drive all the prerequisites to eleven at the cost of quality. It's not a coincidence, it's intentional. The pina colada moment ruins the kick for hardcore fans, so no pina colada moments for the rest of us. The cuck must be utterly clueless and pathetic, the bull must be either a machismo icon or an ugly bastard, and my problem is that neither of those is a character, they are cardboard cutouts. I can't enjoy... this, whereas an NTR fan self-inserts with enviable ease and screams in delight at their vicarious suffering.
And now we're at the rating part. Well... It is unfair. Just as any 5 star rating with the word "potential" in it is also unfair, just as any fetish-brain giving 5 stars just because it has the fetish is unfair.
What does a rating actually stand for, what do you think?
Last edited: