GibboBtw
Active Member
- Jul 7, 2024
- 805
- 1,870
- 172
Not a very high chance of that IMO buddy. If you want her, just make a cheeky little new run, and wife her up instead.
What do you mean. You mean if you don't choose her? I feel like that dangerous. I fully believe that Isis is completely on the MC's side, but she's on the mcs side but that's only because you married her and she wants to essentially do what Cass does and be his advisor. Aurora is kind of a pushover so I could see Elis maybe getting a chance to rape her if you don't pick her. But I feel like Isis would be more likely to kill Elis for rejecting her.
If it were up to me, I would introduce the "4 wives and 3 concubines" system like in ancient China.Not a very high chance of that IMO buddy. If you want her, just make a cheeky little new run, and wife her up instead.
I wish we had the choice of establishing a harem, like in the light novel where the hero, Rational, rebuilds the kingdom, where one of the kings of Elfriden decided that a harem is the best option, and he doesn't need to worry about hiding a concubine from his wife. Especially since in medieval France, there was a position of official favorite at court. It's a shame that MC can't act like Kazuya, whose every marriage is also political, even his younger concubines, like Nonna Domna, are important political figures. Nonna's grandmother is one of the three dukes of the kingdom and an admiral of the fleet.
Filipis
Engaged Member
- Nov 15, 2022
- 2,557
- 4,674
- 386
No, you cannot. Unless you mean ending the Love relationship if you don't kiss her during the portal date.btw you can avoid Seraphina on love path and she did not get pregnant.
Seems like it will be relegated to "flavor" of the scenes only... which is... whelming? On one hand, we have a story that already has 3 "major" characters that can be either alive or dead/killed, but having Lust vs Love paths be different in their consequences is apparently too much?
Also, Seraphina on the Lust path is becoming ever more frustrated at her growing desire for sex, because it keeps overpowering her rational mind - she has riskier & riskier sex with her own son, and (as far as the player knows), gets impregnated by him while in a precarious position; we all forgot to stop and think how LM plans to explain Seraphina getting pregnant when the king is incapacitated. Elin at least has the cover of her marriage with Lockhart, Ophelia is too sick to carry a child to term, but Seraphina is completely fucked once she starts showing... hence her frustration. At least on the Love path, she doesn't seem to care about the consequences, and may even be excited to become a mother again - even if it is by her own son.
You know. I chose the option to maintain the status quo. Because Lady Alaina and Conrad will still be rivals and will control each other. P.S. I like Vel. If I had the chance, I would take her as a concubine and declare the children from this union dukes. And I would give the elves territory for settlement, create a vassal elven kingdom and start recruiting a personal guard from the elves (hello, the Swiss Guard of the French kings) and declare that this branch of his family has no rights to the throne. This is to prevent the precedent of the House of Valois-Burgundy.
Filipis
Engaged Member
- Nov 15, 2022
- 2,557
- 4,674
- 386
This is what interests me the most, too. Initially, I thought the timeskip might be just a few months for whatever reason, but now that basically half the girls are pregnant, having them involved in the plot while waddling around with big bellies seems... troubling.
Either we get exactly that, or the timeskip for CH2 is longer, set right after all the children are born (with maybe a small prologue showing the pregnancies). Hard to say, because LM did kinda imply he would give us a chance to interact with all the women we get pregnant while they're pregnant.
Filipis
Engaged Member
- Nov 15, 2022
- 2,557
- 4,674
- 386
No. It's just an Android port of the compressed version of the game. But I think it can be modded further, even on Android devices.
With The
Active Member
- Jul 25, 2021
- 807
- 1,166
- 287
What do you mean 'no'? You can literally avoid having sex with her, and she won't get pregnant. This means there's a specific story path where she doesn't get pregnant. By choosing that, you basically skip any future scenes involving her kids.
GibboBtw
Active Member
- Jul 7, 2024
- 805
- 1,870
- 172
I mean, maybe we'll get the option to take some official concubines at some point far down the line, who knows. But as far as having both Aurora and Isis in it...Very low chance, as they were both valuable marriages to be offered to a prince. One of them just becoming the "2nd wife" or even worse, a concubine. I think that would be considered rather insulting and a big no-no.
But again, who knows.
...You wanna give Elves land huh...Human lands?...
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
- Oct 14, 2016
- 1,403
- 6,048
- 756
update the second one did not make slide in maybe to much shadow but i will try later another one
|
View attachment download (4).mp4
|
| queen love route justice View attachment download (6).mp4 |
| i will try fix wen have more free gens maybe trying full slide in View attachment download (5).mp4 |
Last edited:
couse some of us dont like the dinamic on the lust path and like how the chars behave on the romance path?
Filipis
Engaged Member
- Nov 15, 2022
- 2,557
- 4,674
- 386
By that measure, MC can remain a monk and not get ANY girl pregnant (except the wife).
Which now makes me think... all these visions seem to say that MC's children are going to be important in some way: what happens to the core plot if you don't have any children with Elin, Seraphina, Cass, or Lia?
Food for thought?
necromater
Engaged Member
- Aug 21, 2018
- 2,085
- 13,302
- 657
GibboBtw
Active Member
- Jul 7, 2024
- 805
- 1,870
- 172
Ah welcome brother, more are always welcome. And this is shaping up to be a good game for us.
Honestly I only remember the wives children and Elis's daughter being important. I don't recall any comments about the others. We already know Val's child isn't important. Speaking of which what about that scene with Isis's daughter maybe being the true snake?
who said anything about human land?! Find some vast wasteland and send elves to settle it. Something like Australia for elves. Create an equivalent of the British dominion system. Rome had a confederate system of empires. The Roman Confederate System: When You're Sort of Rome, But Sort of Independent One of the most sophisticated inventions of the Roman Empire wasn't aqueducts, gladiators, or even the Latin language. The true miracle of Roman engineering was the confederate system—a way to keep half the world under control without spending money on maintaining all that horde. In short: you're formally an independent state, but in reality, you're a free branch of Rome. Or, as they would say today: "We're not a colony, we're security partners." How it worked After each war, Rome generously granted "autonomy" to the defeated peoples. They could: mint their own coins (with the emperor's profile, of course), elect rulers (approved by the Senate), and even fight (only at Rome's behest). In exchange, they were obliged to: supply soldiers for the Roman legions, not enter into alliances without permission, and, most importantly, love Rome—preferably sincerely. You're not a slave—you're a "friend of Rome." The title of amicus populi Romani ("friend of the Roman people") sounded almost like the Legion of Honor. In practice, it meant: "You're now our satellite; pay your taxes, fight for us, and don't even think of thinking for yourself." Numidia, Judea, Cappadocia, and Galatia, for example, had this status—a whole gallery of "friends" who regularly tried to escape this friendship. But escaping Rome was as difficult as escaping Facebook: you seem to delete your account, but the data still remains.
Nepalese Gurkhas, or How British Kings Are Guarded by Mercenaries from Nepal Great Britain, a country with a centuries-old military history, whose armies once controlled a quarter of the world, still relies on one of the most astonishing and ancient mercenary systems: the famous Gurkhas from Nepal. At first glance, it seems like a perfect tale of loyalty: Nepalese warriors, renowned for their ferocity and iconic kukri knife, have voluntarily served under the British flag for over two centuries. But dig deeper, and a sharp historical irony emerges: the British crown is guarded by the descendants of those the Empire never fully subjugated. The Paradox of the "Friend" The history of this alliance began with war. In 1814, the British East India Company clashed with the united Nepalese Kingdom in the Anglo-Nepalese War. The Gurkhas fighting in the highlands demonstrated such desperate courage and incredible resilience that, when the conflict ended with the signing of the Treaty of Sugauli in 1816, the British made a decision that forever changed the fate of their army: they began actively recruiting their former enemies. It was a brilliant imperial move: instead of expending resources on maintaining control of Nepal (the country remained formally independent), Britain simply outsourced its need for fearless infantry. Nepal became, in effect, an independent enclave, supplying the British Army, and later the Indian Army, with its finest sons. The Gurkhas served in every conceivable hotspot of the Empire: from the Indian Mutiny to the world wars, where their losses numbered in the tens of thousands, and to the Falklands War, where their mere presence struck terror into the hearts of Argentine soldiers. Loyalty Bought in Blood The irony reaches its peak in the question of service. The Gurkhas are not simply a Foreign Legion; they are part of the British military establishment. They not only participate in long campaigns but also serve in elite guard units, guarding the royal residences in London and Windsor. Thus, the symbol of British power—the monarch himself—is guarded by soldiers who, according to British law, are not British citizens. This is the ultimate symbol of reliability, since their loyalty, though paid, is rooted in a code of honor that the British themselves respect above any political treaties. Until recently, however, this "loyalty" was accompanied by enormous inequities in pay and pensions compared to their British counterparts. This historical irony sometimes had a very cynical economic dimension: the best soldiers cost the Empire significantly less. The Gurkha Memorial in London bears a phrase that perfectly captures this paradoxical friendship born from admiration for the enemy: "Bravest of the brave, noblest of the noble, no country ever had truer friends than you."