You'll take tentacles, beastiality and bizarre monster porn over NTR? interesting.
You can ignore the context of NTR np. You cannot ignore that the action is a dog slamming a woman in the ass. It's fine either way since preferences don't need justification but I find it extremely odd that you, or anyone would have such a stance.
Is that really the case though? you say "it's always" like that but I'd wager to say that what you've described is maybe 1/4th of General Butch's library.
Yeah I get that you're exaggerating and it's a figure of speech, my point is that you are exaggerating to the farcical extreme and it makes me curious as to the reason behind that.
"You don't like NTR so you MUST like tentacles etc etc"
There's no need to read between the lines here. Jackerman has hit more than he has missed, but overall I enjoy 90% of his content.
Myself and many others just don't like NTR, there's no ifs ands or buts about it, we just don't like it. Some others don't like the incest but stay for the beasty, others stay for just the incest, Jackerman has a wide catalogue that rests within the realm of what is not normal.
GB's NTR content is arguably his most popular kind of content. When people talk about GB, they talk about how amazing his NTR stuff is.
I'm not ignoring a dog slamming a woman in the ass, or Catwoman getting dicked by a horse, or tentacles, even though tentacles aren't really my cup of tea either, that's what drew me into his content, Jackerman was doing things that not many animators were doing at the time, and at a quality I personally had not seen before, and given some of his animations context, not seen since.
I enjoy Jackermans content because:
1. It's not the norm.
2. It's pure fantasy, although beasty stuff is definitely real, it's still incredibly taboo and fits well with the rest of his content.
3. It's good quality stuff that you don't see elsewhere.
I'd still put it down as heavily implied cheating, not exactly NTR, but thankfully I can decide on what I like, not you.
