- Nov 27, 2021
- 406
- 1,425
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Greta is insanely hot..
Really. That's only simple in your mind; IRL and in more realistic gameplay we are genetically predisposed to cheat, and when we get caught ... gaslight! After all, it was their fault that the cheater cheated, anyway ... right?If you're good to your girls and don't reject them, they won't cheat on you. It's really that simple ...
If ron got horcrux'd instead of harry
Got proof of this? cause without knowing every single couple out there, that's just an assumption on your part.The vast majority of humans don't cheat.
Who do you side with? Whose side of the argument are you on?I have family members who got cheated on, and who have done the cheating.
Yeah, which really sucks. Games will be games, I guess.MC has to be ignorant and eat it all up.
Given how much our upbringing determines our default behaviors, it would probably be difficult to say what we are predisposed to. This is something anthropologists and paleoanthropologists have been trying to find out.The vast majority of humans don't cheat. We're not genetically predisposed to anything like that on a species wide level.
As a polyamorous person, I'm not defending cheating, but I do see non-monogamy as natural for me (and many other humans). Consent is key for responsible/ethical non-monogamy, so claiming one is defending rape is a HUGE stretch.Any defense of cheating just makes you look like an asshole and the type of person to defend rape
Cheating as a concept doesn't exist in a vacuum, and Cheating is what is being argued.Given how much our upbringing determines our default behaviors, it would probably be difficult to say what we are predisposed to. This is something anthropologists and paleoanthropologists have been trying to find out.
Current studies show that 20-25% of married men cheat, and 10-15% of married women cheat. In a 2021 survey, they estimated that some 46% of people in monogamous relationships have had affairs (physical or virtual).
Genetic evidence suggests that a rise in monogamous behavior began about 10,000 to 20,000 years ago. Historically, polygyny was a common human reproductive practice until around 5,000 to 10,000 years ago, though polygyny still exists in many modern cultures.
If we're looking at our mammalian relatives, only 9% are monogamous and among primates, 29%. Evidence points to the conclusion that we are non-monogamous by nature, but culture suppresses that. Monogamy is often seen as an invention to preserve property and determine inheritance. Without property concerns, non-monogamy would usually be a more successful reproductive strategy--it increases genetic diversity as well as bonds within a community group.
As a polyamorous person, I'm not defending cheating, but I do see non-monogamy as natural for me (and many other humans). Consent is key for responsible/ethical non-monogamy, so claiming one is defending rape is a HUGE stretch.
True, from an anthropological perspective and polyamorous perspective, I was looking at one factor in cheating--the non-monogamous drive.Cheating as a concept doesn't exist in a vacuum, and Cheating is what is being argued.
Yes, the other factor would be a lack of integrity regarding agreements, regarding the well-being of those one proport to love.It's like saying humans are genetically predisposed to cheating in exams. An outrageous claim given exams aren't naturally occurring instances. If exams aren't natural we can't have any natural instincts towards them specifically.
Similarly, in relation to cheating in relationships, it's the betrayal of expected monogamy, that qualifies cheating. In a world with no societal expectation of monogamy there'd be no concept of cheating as we understand it.
The problem here is that it is hard to rely upon historical self-reporting of fidelity. Is there more infidelity now because of relaxed expectations, or do we just have more acknowledged infidelity now. The only way to determine the truth of the matter, to get beyond self-reporting bias would be genetic testing. Much like we discovered about some assumed monogamous birds. We found that many will mate with one male for offspring, but stay with a more stable, less flashy male to raise chicks. It was quite a surprise to scientists who'd assumed that they were totally monogamous for life.Comparing stats on the levels of infidelity in contemporary times versus times when societies views of many things, relationships included, were vastly different isn't fair, it's a bad comparison.
Already addressed above.Being non-monogamous by nature is completely different that being cheaters by nature. In contemporary ethical non-monogamy, as I'm sure you know, everyone involved has to give knowing consent otherwise it's cheating, you're betraying the other person. No one partner can decide it's a poly or open relationship.
Yes, they could be considered similar in that they both are self-centered actions that do not consider others. Rational or not, I see a big difference.My reason for likening it to rape is this; using supposed natural instinct or genetic predisposition to any given behavior, in this case Cheating, and stripping it of it's societal moral judgments not to mention individual human agency, and treating it as, if not good, simply inevitable and thus something to be accepted is something that can be used on any negative behavior.
Rapists will often, already, claim that they just couldn't help or stop themselves. Cheaters the same.
Rape, and Consent, also don't exist in a vacuum. Much like everything else I've talked about are a human concept. There's rape the action, and rape the crime. Marital Rape was legal in Ireland until 1990, meaning the act of rape was not the crime of rape until the law changed.
Hello and thank you for your commentFirst of all, I want to say that i love the game so far. I really like just about everything about it, music, renders, dialogue, etc. (yes, I sat at the opening screen of the moving van in traffic for a long time, just listening to the music.)
I apologize for not posting in french as well, but my french is more than 50 years out of practice, and I don't want to embarrass myself.
As most sane people have said on the thread (yes I read it all), as a developer, you have to do your own vision. You can't let trolls influence you. Certainly, you can take input from others, if it works with your vision, but don't compromise it.
just about the only thing that bothers me is that I can't find anywhere that will open up the journal. Am I blind? (I already have glasses) or can some helpful soul help me find it.
And now, I'm off to donate for the dev's creation. It won't be much as I'm old and on a fixed income, but hopefully every little bit helps.
Thank you, thank you, thank you! I have no idea how I missed the phone (I must be going blind), and it never occurred to me to click on the heart.Hello and thank you for your comment
To open the menu, it's at the bottom left of the screen, next to the image of the characters talking. There's a heart to open the compendium, and underneath you have the phone.
what bugs did you come across?Pretty interesting game the first couple updates, but as usual with most games the bugs become too much. I'm done with this trash.