It's said that bad publicity is still publicity for a reason.That's ironic. You want to know a strawman argument? Acting like people are saying Rem should receive no criticism or feedback when in reality they are saying Rem doesn't deserve overly negative feedback.
Overly negative feedback may be based on a kernel of truth, but then the baby gets thrown out with the bathwater in a multiple potential ways. Maybe it is as simple as your potentially useful insight gets thrown out because your petulant attitude, or maybe Rem just gives up as a developer entirely.
It is important to keep things in context. This game is overwhelmingly a success. Are there things that can be improved? Of course. Will we agree with everything Rem does? Of course not. However, it is important to recognize the positive and the negative and not simply focus on the negative. Nobody is saying the game or Rem can't use feedback. I'll let you fill in the blanks about what that means they are saying.
If there is criticism, means that there is interest for the thing to improve (when done in good faith)
where there is not criticism, there is no interest.
but still not everyone can agree on the same concept of improvement.