- Oct 27, 2020
- 264
- 416
It's not 48 fps? It's 24Thanks. I wanted to ask the same if frames were edited cuz it really didn't feel like 48FPS to me. I think whoever edited it forgot (e..g in Premiere Pro) to apply Optical Flow.
It's not 48 fps? It's 24Thanks. I wanted to ask the same if frames were edited cuz it really didn't feel like 48FPS to me. I think whoever edited it forgot (e..g in Premiere Pro) to apply Optical Flow.
I was referring to 1st uploaded animation of Lara not the one that Sir Wolf uploaded...It's not 48 fps? It's 24
Same ones as in the torrent several pages back. Check the torrent contents and you'll see what's in it. Those are some older blend files and we're still missing newer ones due to his mega being taken down etc.What is the blend files in the OP?
Blender is one of the best software tools to create animations (mainly because it's free and quite powerful).I'm asking what is a blend file?What is it's uses?
Yeah, this new model is sick!It's free, atleast the 1080p one. Link is on twitter. Holy shit though, that's a great animation and that model is so good. Definitely contender to wildeer's lara
Anyone got the no watermarked version?You must be registered to see the links
You do realize your comments are completely empty right?
Odds are a version without watermark doesn't exist despite the copy-pasted words in the tweet. In fact there wasn't any perceivable difference between the 1080p and 5K version of the previous animation since they have the same bitrate. Maybe the 5K was a little worse since it amplified the macroblocking.Anyone got the no watermarked version?You must be registered to see the links
Can you mirror it google drive has a download limit thank you!