- Feb 17, 2024
- 71
- 27
what do you mean atleast thats a bad thing last thing anyone wants is for AI to perfectly replicate other peoples work just so no talent assholes wont have to pay artist for there work but just steal it and feed it to AI and profit off itLook at Isabelle's eyebrows and bells for a clear tell. But if you're struggling to tell that means the tech is advancing at least.
It's not a bad thing. Electric guitars didn't kill acoustic guitars, photoshop and cellphone cameras didn't kill photography, and digital art didn't kill oil paintings. Art by artists will always have its place, and AI tools make getting art accessible for devs without paying an arm and a leg.what do you mean atleast thats a bad thing last thing anyone wants is for AI to perfectly replicate other peoples work just so no talent assholes wont have to pay artist for there work but just steal it and feed it to AI and profit off it
Just want to point out this game hasn't actually rasied over $7,000 usd on its own and is actually part of a bundle. Majority of the games in the bundle are mediocre 3d games that are likely just flipping assets with probably 4 or 5 of them being AI focused art. Still shit none the less but you know, at least its not like people are genuinely giving this game specifically 7 grand. People see 15 games for 10 bucks and that's 10 bucks more than it should be in my opinion but people are dumb with their money regardless.View attachment 4036985
Creativity is dying and we're killing it.
It's really not, people just need to look harder or put their glasses on lmaoLook at Isabelle's eyebrows and bells for a clear tell. But if you're struggling to tell that means the tech is advancing at least.
Actually, if anything, furries have been some of the most vocally AGAINST AI Image Generation since so many are artists themselvesFurries are unfortunately not known for good financial decisions, and devs will keep fleecing them for it.
Meanwhile, that's all AI is. Stealing the style of actual artists, by scraping, to train the AI. That's why AI slop ALL looks the same. Mass scraping to train the AI gives you the amalgam look the all have. I have yet to NOT be able to tell something is AI, just from the thumb as the link is opened.It is definitely AI, funnily enough, they all share the same type of AI art style for porn so it's pretty easy to recognize it. Personally i don't mind AI Art as long as they don't steal arts from others to make them, but there's something repulsive that i don't like in AI art porn, like, it looks "nice" graphically but at the same time it looks very bad, it's hard to explain.
If you are on PC:So I got a glitch that let me be a million in blackjack and lost now it's impossible to do anything is there a way to reset the game fully? I tried deleting and re-installing the whole thing including the local. just keeps the -1 mill amount.
by taking peoples art and putting it in a blender and making soulless mimicry of said art there's no skill no talent necessary at most they just have to shift through the shit and get the ones that look best.It's not a bad thing. Electric guitars didn't kill acoustic guitars, photoshop and cellphone cameras didn't kill photography, and digital art didn't kill oil paintings. Art by artists will always have its place, and AI tools make getting art accessible for devs without paying an arm and a leg.
Bad faith comparison: Oil Painting/Acoustic Guitar -> Digital Art/Electric Guitar is an evolution of tools with the same general methods of use. You use the same general skill set from the old tool to use the new tool.It's not a bad thing. Electric guitars didn't kill acoustic guitars, photoshop and cellphone cameras didn't kill photography, and digital art didn't kill oil paintings. Art by artists will always have its place, and AI tools make getting art accessible for devs without paying an arm and a leg.
blackjack (and the other casino games are likely from some other game) is so poorly done that there is a game breaking bug in it. (you can bet more than money you have but if you lose you get a negative amount and the game breaks down)Game is poorly coded for BlackJack, lots of game play errors... Had Q-A and it totaled it as 11, not backjack, a lot of times it will give A as 1 only. Can't do splits. I've played Blackjack games for nearly 40 years (Intellivision in the 80s) and this is one of the worst for game accuracy.
It also seems to reset the deck every match. Which is par for lots of games, but still lame.